Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg

File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 17:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Charlesjsharp I agree with you, but I also think that there is no way to cut this photo since it is a composition that never ends at the bottom --Wilfredor (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed it was ... that's what I get for doing this that late. Changed Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose It's a vibrant scene, but there's no clear main subject, and if the subject is the street itself then the composition doesn't feel like it balances the various pieces. The light grey structure to the left is very much sidelined, and its outline fights with the buildings seen beyond it on both sides. The long building on the right is interesting but not very prominent in the scene, and the same holds for the tall pagoda in the distance beyond it. Additionally, to my eye the image needs to be rotated about two degrees clockwise. --Bobulous (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment In this picture main subject is not just one building or street. This photo was taken from the terrace of small building as shown in this picture. And i think there is no way to crop this photo Here's some example: First Second from same photographer. Thank you Best regards -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support I'm very much grateful to see such a beautiful holy photograph. I really don't see the crop or visitors as disturbing or not working. For me, it shows the beauty of the place and make me feels sacred. Additionally, top to mid view is really eye catching. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]