Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porta Nigra abends.jpg

File:Porta Nigra abends.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2013 at 02:10:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 02:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 02:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 22:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice light, motif and colors, but I think the use of a small focal length followed by software perspective correction resulted in an unnatural object shape. Cf. top of the two towers. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Especially the right tower doesn't meet reality. Perhaps the coulors may be correct but they are not appealing. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What is reality? The form of the towers depends on your standpoint. Photographed with tele from far away the tower is compressed, photographed from the position here with wide angle lines look longer (exactly the way as you would stand at this position). --Tuxyso (talk) 10:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC) [reply]
weak support: I like the photo (exposure, mood and very good sharpness with regard to the long exposure time). Two aspects are slightly disturbing: The fence and (more important) the scaffolding especially at the right gate. IMHO it still deserves FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Dey.sandip (talk) 15:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Tuxyso. Michael Barera (talk) 02:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Norbert --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ( Pro) (Stimme zur Unterstüzung des Exzellenz-Status') — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcalino (talk • contribs)
- Unsufficient edits to vote. Yann (talk) 10:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per Norbert Nagel. Yann (talk) 10:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]