Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portal, Pitam Niwas Chowk, City Palace, Jaipur, 20191218 1000 9059.jpg

File:Portal, Pitam Niwas Chowk, City Palace, Jaipur, 20191218 1000 9059.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2023 at 10:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info created and uploaded by Jakub Halun - nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm not in love with the excessive shadows; although nothing can be done about it, it ruins the picture for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. The shadows in the original did bother me as well because I thought they were too dark, which is why I reduced them, but I think the shadows are an authentic representation of the structure of the gate. The large outer frame of the gate protrudes significantly out of the wall, while the door is at wall-level. A shadow-less image, if it even is possible, would make the gate look rather two dimensional imo (though I imagine it would still be a very beautiful image). UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A fascinating portal and a well-done photograph. The shadow may distract at the first glance, but on the other hand it shows the 3-dimensional structure of the portal; without shadows the portal would look flat. --Aristeas (talk) 08:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas --Schnobby (talk) 08:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support according to the explaining context of UnpetitproleX. His editing is an enhancement to the image. These shadows add a special charm that makes the scenery appear like a painting, imho. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The image would look more boring in flat light, and the shadows give it depth. A painter would have included them. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 20:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors