Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Qatar Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner A7-BCO MUC 2015 02.jpg

File:Qatar Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner A7-BCO MUC 2015 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 06:50:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Airliners
Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. One of the most popular contemporary airplanes, with no FP so far. -- Andrei (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Technically well photographed; definitely QI, possibly VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. -- GRDN711 (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 20:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is good but I agree with GRDN711 nothing wild here Poco a poco (talk) 22:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The sharpness is really excellent, but maybe it's a bit low on 'wow', I think the light is a bit dull. Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per GRDN711, wow too lacking. StellarHalo (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Good QI but lacking something.--Peulle (talk) 06:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As an aviation enthusiast I would love to support this, but I simply am not wowed by this photo. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a good one. Deserves its QI badge, has potential for VI and maybe even FP at Wikipedia. But as far as "WOW" goes, this is just another typical plane spotter type shot. We have thousands of them, and this one does not stand out among the crowd. --El Grafo (talk) 09:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 16:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others – surely nice and good but too straightforward (not to say uninspired) to be featured IMHO. --Kreuz schnabel 17:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]