Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RiP2013 Paramore Hayley Williams 0003.jpg

File:RiP2013 Paramore Hayley Williams 0003.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2014 at 10:02:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Sven0705 - uploaded by Sven0705 - nominated by Smial -- Smial (talk) 10:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Smial (talk) 10:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dynamic, ~~fair~~ nice quality image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- But we can see her fillings, isn't that grounds to vehemently oppose? ;-) Sorry to be POINTy, but I was just reminded of how you were so opposed to featuring a portrait with a slightly discoloured tooth. Diliff (talk) 14:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is a vast difference between a single filling deep in the recesses of a mouth of an otherwise brilliant smile and that of gunk filled front teeeth with stains. Save that kind of detail for the cathedrals :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good timing and composition. Eye-catching and refreshing. For me an FP. --Slaunger (talk) 19:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 20:48, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --DXR (talk) 21:25, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a great picture, but it doesn't look as though any chroma noise reduction has been applied. At 10MP, I can't really ignore such objectionable noise the way I might at 36MP. As an aside, if Sven0705 can re-process from RAW, then it should be exported as sRGB for the web, not AdobeRGB. -- Colin (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Colin, Chroma noise reduction should be applied, ideally from RAW but if not, any of us should be able to apply the chroma noise reduction. As it stands, the chroma noise is quite objectionable. Diliff (talk) 14:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Better now, although slightly more colour noise correction could have been applied without affecting detail IMO. Diliff (talk) 07:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Slight chroma and vlf noise reduction applied. -- Smial (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course! That's "Concert Photography". --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely Support now. The timing is perfect. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes ! Pleclown (talk) 11:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment hand? There is plenty of space left, you can cut it to remove even that bad out-of-focus hand? removing just the piece below also, as you can not kill for the size. The rest is perfect! --Pava (talk) 01:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --· Favalli ⟡ 02:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bright colors on a dark background. Soerfm (talk) 09:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

]]) 13:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)}}