Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seitenraum der Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0362 3 4 5 6.jpg

File:Seitenraum der Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0362 3 4 5 6.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2015 at 02:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info all by Hubertl -- Hubertl 02:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Side tract of the hall of fame, Museum for military history, Vienna
Support -- Hubertl 02:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good job! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, this is an amazing shot. Congratulations! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strongly distorted foreground columns are too distracting to me, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 09:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that these columns are round. To confirm. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Ivar. The distorted columns are too dominant to ignore. Medium69, see this image for comparison. Also not convinced about colour balance. -- Colin (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good picture of a very interesting room! Definitely FP for me. Not sure whether the category above is correct, this doesn't seem to be a "Reliogious building". --Code (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For Ivar --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment While I don't mind the perspective distortion, there seems to be a slight amount of pincushion distortion or something which should be corrected first. The left pillar is bending outwards, and the other pillars and walls seem to be subtly curved as well. You can also see evidence of pincushion distortion by comparing the horizontal lines on the ground against a grid. dllu (t,c) 03:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Done - I´ve corrected the distortion, dllu. I know now, why I´ve got this. A slight mistake, actually an omission at the very beginning within the pretty complex workflow. Please purge the page, if you don´t see it. --Hubertl 11:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks okay now. Shooting 11mm on a full frame sensor is quite interesting. dllu (t,c) 11:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks, dllu, in fact, it´s not so easy. Needs practice. --Hubertl 13:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ivar. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The foreground columns are clearly distorted, as are the side doors and walls. Furthermore, the upper part of the right column doesn't look sharp... Gzzz (talk) 21:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors