Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 08:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Yousuf Karsh - first uploaded by Benoit Rochon - current version uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Pandakekok9 -- panda kekok 9 08:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --panda kekok 9 08:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 08:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some restorations could be done, but still, iconic. Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ FP rulesː "Featured pictures are images from highly skilled photographers"ː the link defines photographers as Wiki photographers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- again, where is this rule Charles? Seven Pandas (talk) 19:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See unresolved discussion here for my interpretation of current guidelines Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Featured_pictures_are_images_from_highly_skilled_photographers_and_illustrators Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- So there's been no posts there for two and now you've decided to force the issue?Seven Pandas (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colin has edited the page that I used as the basis of my oppose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only just now did he do so. I totally agree with Colin and the others and I think your opposes should be stricken as you are trying to force an issue on "rules" that don't exist. Were you planning the many other photos that are on Commons, including FPs, that you felt fell into this category? Seven Pandas (talk) 22:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I interpreted the rules in good faith. Colin has edited the page I relied on. I apologise for annoying you Seven Pandas. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I really like this portrait, but as I argued in the nomination of this photo, the few bits of surface noise on this photo should perhaps be removed for FP. I don't understand why this photo was already showing up as "not featured", and I got rid of that stuff. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question What's with the recurrent "Not featured" crap from the bot (I guess?) on this nomination? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I should have created a new nomination page instead of reusing this. The bot looks at the first revision in history, which is why it's attempting to close it prematurely. I will add the {{Bots}} template to make it stop. panda kekok 9 05:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Great photograph, but the digital reproduction does not convince me. There seem to be heavy compression artifacts on his coat. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose repair candidate, original source also needs updating.--BevinKacon (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]