Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Soyuz TMA-13.jpg

File:Soyuz TMA-13.jpg, not featured edit

Info created by NASA - uploaded by Savant-fou - nominated by Savant-fou --Savant-fou (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Savant-fou (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support For some reason, I don't find this image to be as stunning as I would have expected. However, this does look like the best image of its type on the Commons. The value should be self-evident, and there's nothing too bad I can say about the photographic quality, either. --Notyourbroom (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Support removed as a matter of process, because this version is tied with the Edit version for support, and I prefer the latter. --Notyourbroom (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Of the launching, perhaps, but I think this one might also have a chance at FP. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Notyourbroom.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -Two reasons: (i) look at the sky at left (low jpeg quality?); (ii) Let the poor thing fly - give it more space above! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I seem to have started a run on space images! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 23:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree with Alvesgaspar. —kallerna™ 08:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support the edit. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose could be sharper (they're not really that fast just coming off the pad) --ianaré (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 support, 2 oppose => not featured (Edit has more support votes) --Simonizer (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit, featured edit

Info - Noise reduction on the sky, upper part of the sky digitaly added. --Lošmi (talk) 12:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, I think this version is superior. --Notyourbroom (talk) 15:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna™ 15:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, much better. --Aqwis (talk) 16:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Savant-fou (talk) 18:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Biso (talk) 01:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX^talk 10:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 16:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support good --Mbdortmund (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely shot. --Ahnode (talk) 23:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 06:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 10 support, 0 oppose => featured --Simonizer (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]