Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spital aP Ochsenwaldkapelle vv.jpg

File:Spital aP Ochsenwaldkapelle vv.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2021 at 21:21:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Upper_Austria
Info I found the colours and composition of this mountain landscape painterly and compelling. created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Very beautiful scene, though detail is not the highest at 24 MP with mediocre pixel-level sharpness. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

True. 24 megapixels is a decent size though. This 10.7mpx downsample seems pretty sharp at pixel level. Cmao20 (talk) 21:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I cannot see what is the purpose of the huge tree. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question Isn't a tree's purpose simply to live? :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Solitary trees, if they grow at all, grow strong (WSC) Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support An impressive landscape photo for me. --Stepro (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per King of Hearts. --Aristeas (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Charles, the composition is not working for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 10:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose A lovely scene, I have no problem with the composition at all ... but as so often, when viewed in closeup, technical limitations noted by King become too apparent not to consider. In this case not only does the image grow increasingly unsharp near the corners, it seems that someone doing post tried too hard to make it work with the contrast. The overly light (the meadow) and dark (the distant forests) are kind of unsharp and muddy, the distant forests on the mountains as well as the rocky summit look unnatural, as if drawn rather than photographed, and the ridgeline and some of the gaps in the tree seem a little oversharpened, with a visible halo. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it's all been said - Benh (talk) 08:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support As noted above, the sharpness is not ideal, but the scene is very good so I can forgive it.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice scene and the quality seems OK to me, but the composition doesn't really work for me. If there had been a way for the tree to be to the left of the hill instead of overlapping it, it might have. I also don't love the trees on the right, one of which is bisected. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 10:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]