Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stortjärnen October 2014 02.jpg

File:Stortjärnen October 2014 02.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2014 at 10:20:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Ice covered shore of lake Stortjärnen in Ljungdalen, Sweden. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- I find the foreground amazingly beautiful but somehow spoiled by the background and the curved horizon. I would crop the offending part and only keep the water. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanky ou for your suggestion. I added a alternative!--ArildV (talk) 13:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support either version. (sorry, can't decide, they both have their own kind of charm) --El Grafo (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this version because the landscape. ArionEstar (talk) 18:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ 1,280 × 720 pixels, too less for me. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Info Sorry but the size is 5,764 × 3,242 pixels.--ArildV (talk) 10:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I thought I have reverted myself. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support I prefer this more. Good work! --Hubertl (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The ice in the foreground is nice, but the foam is partly blown, and the bokeh in the sea beyond is not nice at all, anything but soft. --Kreuz schnabel 09:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose See below. -- Ram-Man 17:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Great picture, ArildV. I prefer this one over the cropped version. Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Support--ArildV (talk) 13:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support either version. (sorry, can't decide, they both have their own kind of charm) --El Grafo (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yes! Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ 1,280 × 575 pixels, too less for me. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Info Sorry, but the size is 5,764 × 2,588 pixels. --ArildV (talk) 10:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I thought I have reverted myself. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose same as above. --Kreuz schnabel 09:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't know if it is the blown highlights, the oversharpened appearance (the foreground details are sharp, but indistinct), or the high contrast, but it's not working for me. -- Ram-Man 17:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Im. / Fav.} 18:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]