Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Dome Church at Les Invalides - July 2006-3.jpg

File:The Dome Church at Les Invalides - July 2006-3.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2011 at 06:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Paris 16 (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Poor lighting - Benh (talk) 08:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose was of course an oppose - Benh (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The job (mosaïc, resolution) is fantastic, but I'm sorry, the stones doesn't look so in real, the natural colors are more "warm". Probably due to the bad lighting, per Benh.--Jebulon (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in general, it's the right weather to make photos of this building, because of the gold. But in this case, it's really much too hazy. There's also a small stitching error. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, I've already shot this under clear weather and don't think I came up with undesired reflections - Benh (talk) 11:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

but your picture was made from another perspective --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but my point was that this is not right weather. And perspective changes nothing here. - Benh (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good, but I admit it isn't perfect.--Snaevar (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good composition, but the lighting is too dull.--Nikopol (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor lighting. --Karelj (talk) 10:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor lighting too.--Claus (talk) 09:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:42, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]