Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thunderbolt II 080325.jpg

File:Thunderbolt II 080325.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2009 at 10:20:35

Info created by Brad White, US Air Force - uploaded by El torero - nominated by ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
SupportGreat image!--Kuvaly (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality isn't that good. Same thing with composition. —kallerna™ 16:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good photo, but a bit of chromatic aberration, moreover I personally wouldn't print such a picture. →Diti the penguin — 18:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The man is cut by the wing. And the image tries to be rather aesthetic (perspective, clouds) than factual - in this military context a sign of advertisment/propaganda. --Tsui (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Question What sort of propaganda value is a crashed plane? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 02:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is crashed? At least to me that is not obvious (the information is "hidden" in the exif-data, now I found it). It looks like just one more picture or military equipment (a discussion about the propaganda value of such images would go beyond the scope of this page). --Tsui (talk) 21:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Indeed. I've created a section on the talk age for it. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mainly composition! Tiago Fioreze (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again rather poor quality (e.g. CA) for the expensive sponsored hardware. Lycaon (talk) 07:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karel (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured.  --Karel (talk) 08:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]