Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Toronto - ON - Humber Bay Arch Bridge2.jpg

File:Toronto - ON - Humber Bay Arch Bridge2.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 20:22:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the perspective and the overall framing of the topic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the white arc is overexposed because the parapet wires are invisible before it. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

maybe you're right, i'll proof it soon. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:44, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The graffiti ruins it. Gidip (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It needs perspective correction on the left and is too bright and too unsharp in the middle. Sorry. --XRay ^talk 07:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject overexposed. The arch and sky are nice but other components not so great. -- Colin (talk) 11:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Gidip and Colin. Too much stark concrete in the foreground; try framing or cropping more tightly? Too bad about that graffiti. Kbh3rd (talk) 05:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Info Kreuzschnabel, Gidip, Colin, Kbh3rd, XRay. new version uploaded. Too much concrete? Not possible. I love concrete! :-)) --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:22, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is really a lovely composition, but the off-centered non-vertical line in the bottom of the file is really distracting for me. It is clear that perfect symmetry has been sought for in the bridge (and I like that a lot), but it is only half done. --Slaunger (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this image IS centered, adjusted on the arch bridge and not on the non symmetric road surface. Very creative argumentation but sadly not truth. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry you do not like my annotations. But I have added another to illustrate the symmetry is not quite there. --Slaunger (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]