Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valle Arcoiris, Río Grande, Chile, 2016-02-05, DD 11-15 PAN.JPG

File:Valle Arcoiris, Río Grande, Chile, 2016-02-05, DD 11-15 PAN.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2018 at 21:18:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Valle Arcoiris ("Rainbow Valley"), Rio Grande near San Pedro de Atacama, northern Chile. Poc o² 21:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 21:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Yes. More like this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 03:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. Charles (talk) 09:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 09:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but if you had a proper horizon, you would see it going up and down. Quite a big error IMO. - Benh (talk) 17:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Benh: I don't know what you mean. Do you think that there is a stitching issue? where? --Poc o² 21:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes I meant the horizon "undulates" (thanks Daniel). It's a stitching issue. It's personally the first thing I see, and people who aren't used to stitching don't even care (They should when they are so easy to trigger the distorsion issues, this is real one...). But easy fix. - Benh (talk) 21:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Benh: I don't see how your theory could be possible, I tried my best to shoot the pano (and I've shot hundreds), all settings for all frames are manual (and identical) and if there is no stitching issues. Poc o² 21:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Then you didn't shoot enough. Stitching issues are not only areas not properly overlapping, but can be on the horizon too (here undulating). And nothing connected to settings being manual or not. Here you are only "saved" because the horizon is not obvious and most reviewers are not careful. - Benh (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks to me like there are slight slopes at the base of the hills that, unless you're willing to look closely, make the image appear to unduly undulate. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Per Daniel. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One vote shall be enough - Benh (talk) 21:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I marked the critical spot. That should be easy to fix. Otherwise very good.--Ermell (talk) 07:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks for the note, Ermell Poc o² 21:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:48, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /---- Cart (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural