Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vliegden (Pinus sylvestris) tussen bloeiende heide. Locatie, Schaopedobbe (Schapenpoel) 04.jpg

File:Vliegden (Pinus sylvestris) tussen bloeiende heide. Locatie, Schaopedobbe (Schapenpoel) 04.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2016 at 04:44:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Pine tree (Pinus sylvestris) between flowering heather. Location, Schaopedobbe (Schapenpoel) in the Netherlands. All by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support lNeverCry 04:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - To my mind, this is a really good portrait of the tree, with the flowers as colorful supporting cast. In this context, I don't mind the unsharpness or motion blur of the flowers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well captured and sharp. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~You could put down red channel a bit, see white clouds.~~ Done--Mile (talk) 07:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question: To the clouds a little lighter?--Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Famberhorst I think red channel for all picture, just put down and look when pic will feel OK. I mentioned clouds where this is seen mostly, since they should be white. --Mile (talk) 16:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support but per PetarM --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 08:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Is this really one of the finest pictures on Commons? It lacks wow for me. I would also like to see the trunk. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: healthy detached (Pinus sylvestris) is widely ramified and looks like this. the trunk is so much to see.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground. -- -donald- (talk) 12:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support The colors and composition are just right. Daniel Case (talk) 20:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 04:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition does not convince me. I feel like creeping up the slope and discover the tree trunk...--AWeith (talk) 21:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note. The tree stands on a steep sand ridge.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 21:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but I have to agree with other opposers. And post-processing has gone too far - details are washed out (especially on the foreground). --Ivar (talk) 14:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zcebeci (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Uoae1--Ermell (talk) 21:46, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. --Hockei (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 10:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 06:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]