Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vruchtbeginsel van een Tamme kastanje (Castanea sativa) 24-06-2023. (d.j.b).jpg

File:Vruchtbeginsel van een Tamme kastanje (Castanea sativa) 24-06-2023. (d.j.b).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2023 at 08:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info created & uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:32, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I don't really understand that with a relatively low detail / resolution you needed 61 images for the focus stacking to achieve this result Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: It was a small (13 mm), delicate and soft fruiting principle and I didn't want to risk stacking failure.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Oppose I am being objective, but you have many focus stacking errors - this time around the white bits where the green bits are blurred. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Question Am I the only one to notice that you seemingly have an issue with almost all FP nominations of Famberhorst's images? SHB2000 (talk) 02:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment This problem is also recurrent for this same VI contributor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment No, you are not the only one. --Aristeas (talk) 07:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I am entitled to have high standards for focus-stacking. Please compare this focus stack with current FPC by Ivar or FPCs from several other users and you will see the difference in editing competence. I cannot see why we would want to promote poorly executed stacks of straightforward subjects. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That’s obvious. You are certainly also excellent in spotting small overexposed areas, feathers w/o definition, blurred and noisy areas, unfortunate backgrounds etc. in photos – congrats. I just wonder again and again why your eagle eyes seem to be less sharp as soon as it comes to your own photos. They often contain the same little faults (overexposed areas, feathers w/o definition, blurred and noisy areas, unfortunate backgrounds …) which lead you to oppose photos by other photographers. To master an art or craft from the ground up, an old rule says, one must be more critical of one’s own works than of those of others, not less. And then there’s the notorious problem of oversharpening in your photos – please compare your photos with current FPC by Ivar or FPCs from several other users and you will see the difference in editing competence. If we all would apply the “high standards” which you apply to other people’s photos (especially to Famberhorst’s ones) to your photos, you would have a hard time on FPC. So I would like to invite you to follow the model of most other voters here: just ignore some tiny little faults and concentrate on the overall quality and expression of a photo also when you assess photos by other photographers. That’s easy, you must just judge other people’s photos with the same grace and mercy as your own ones. --Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
+1. Yann (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+2. SHB2000 (talk) 23:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+3. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:41, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for nominating my photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 18:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Slightly qualified support. The white areas on the spikes at the top of the fruit seem almost blown and could do with a little highlight suppression. But, they're not such a huge part of the image, so it's featurable. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 10:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC) -- Radomianin (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Fagaceae