Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Waverley at Swanage.jpg

File:Waverley at Swanage.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2009 at 14:59:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Herbythyme - uploaded by Herbythyme - nominated by Herbythyme -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great quality image of historic boat.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but unlike Mila I think that the quality isn't even remotely good enough. Sharpness simply leaves too much to be desired. -- JovanCormac 16:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the image is QI already. It was not me, who promoted it, which means that at least two people believe that the quality is fine. :), and besides we do not have nearly enough boats featured--Mbz1 (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I might be of some assistance in that department. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 22:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was me who promoted it. It is a good QI, but for FP it's lacking that little extra. Maybe if the sun cam from the left and lit the whole vessel, but as it is I have to

Oppose, sorry. -- H005

06:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose poor light --ianaré (talk) 05:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Overall a nice image, I especiaaly like that I can see the creases in the metal plates along the bow :-). I think the image as a whole is properly exposed, but it needs the sun a little further around to light up the stern section, the paddle wheel and the lower parts of the hull. As it was berthed, perhaps a stitched photo would be a possibility to give the resolurtion desired by others. --Tony Wills (talk) 22:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Petritap (talk) 11:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]