Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Western Snowy Plover , Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus at Ocean Beach at low tide.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2010 at 15:53:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Comment nice composition, but imo too unsharp for this file size and some cloning errors?! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:16, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- There was no cloning done on the image, so there cannot be errors. The birds are very, very small, and very, very fast moving. The image is not of an individual birds, but of flock of birds. It was not down sampled. It was only cropped. The note you added: It is just a reflection of one bird and the real (other bird) got together (no error there)--Mbz1 (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral -- İlk başta oldukça ilgi çekse de boyut olarak rahatsız edici. Geniş olması hoş durmuyor. Ancak güzel bir çalışma. Mulazimoglu (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Question -- Why is this picture showing larger than all the others? A bug in the template? Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- No, not a bug in the template. The nom is setup as a default "landscape", which fixes its height to 300px. Its aspect ratio is somewhat in between landscape and panorama, which makes its displayed area larger than the nom immediately below it. The nom above it has been setup as landscape, although it is really a portrait (which is normally displayed with a pixel width of 300px). Thus, that one is shown too small. --Slaunger (talk) 07:55, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:41, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Support Fajne zdjęcie słitttasne :P x3 x3 :D <3 <3 loffciam tom fotkeee :3 -- No anonymous votes, please -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose, sorry. I like it a lot and would support if it wasn't for the brown haloes around the birds. --Avenue (talk) 08:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly I do not see any halos around the birds. Maybe something with my eyes or my monitor.--Mbz1 (talk) 11:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- I see a brownish halo extending up to five pixels out from each bird. They're kind of faint, but they're there. I've added an image note outlining the halo around one of the birds near the centre. The background inside the outline definitely looks browner to me than the background just outside it (except near the beak and tail). --Avenue (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support love it... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Comment probably a more space in the right side will enhance the composition of this image.. (cloning job is easy here) Ggia (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
edit 1 per Ggia
edit- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 23:14, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support I think it has also more vivid blue color.. Ggia (talk) 23:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Why two chances for this picture ? It is not the same (size ?), it is another confusing nomination --Jebulon (talk) 23:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Is that's why you're opposing not because of the image itself, but because of "confusing nomination"? I improved the composition adding more to the right hand side as Ggia suggested. I was told not to overwrite an old version with a new one, so that's why I added this alternative, which is a different crop of the same image. Everything is within the rules. Anyway...--Mbz1 (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- In my opinion, a different crop of the same image is not the same image, especially if it adds something. It is another time another problem with another confusing nomination. Maybe before another withdrawn ?
- You said I improved the composition etc.... Are you sure it is an improvement ? Will you "edit" after every comment ? Please more blue ? Please more birds ? Please more sharpness ? In my opinion, you must have to nominate at first the good one, or re-upload, or withdraw, or wait. I request you friendly: please don't be so reactive, we've got the time, let your first nomination live its life entirely, and alone, until the end ! Rework your photo, try improvements on your computer, and if not featured at first time, try another time with explanations. I'm sorry, as a newbie, to say this to an 'old' and experimented contributor. You know that I respect really your work here, and there is nothing personal. But yes, I oppose. We need peace and not sources of eternal conflicts. May I suggest you, if you want to answer, to do it maybe on my talk page ? Thx --Jebulon (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- too bad about the withdrawal. I liked it. ;) Stellarkid (talk) 04:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)