Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Backtowel.jpg

Image:Backtowel.jpg, not featured

Info created by Peter Klashorst - uploaded by Bobisbob - nominated by Mutter Erde -- Mutter Erde (talk) 21:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mutter Erde (talk) 21:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is quite good, but I don't like composition and lighting --norro (talk) 11:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- shouldn't this nom have been added at the (then) top of the list, instead of at the bottom (pun not intended!) where it probably won't be noticed? -- Korax1214 (talk) 11:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see someone has corrected the bum positioning (pun intended this time) by moving the nom. -- Korax1214 (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Karelj (talk) 18:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral There are several marks of the underwear visible...a classical mistake in act photography. The model should wear only wide and soft clothes before the shooting to avoid such marks. --AngMoKio (talk) 18:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. -- Laitche (talk) 19:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is special because it is different. And a good image.--Econt (talk) 22:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Calibas (talk) 02:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Tomfriedel What is special about this photo, that would make it a Wikimedia featured picture? Quality of course should be perfect for a close up with today's cameras. I agree about the lighting and composition. Fine photo but Wikimedia featured pic??
Oppose I would have supported if there was no underwear marks on the skin. --S23678 (talk) 03:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Commons has not yet had a photograph of a piggy bank as FP -- 67.180.38.172 04:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC) No anonymous votes allowed. Lycaon (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per other opposers. Lycaon (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per other opposers. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't help but think that this nom is trying to make a point. Oppose per other noms but specifically, lacks the quality an FP requires. ++Lar: t/c 11:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like composition and lighting, but not the marks on the skin. Vassil (talk) 17:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No geocoding Neutral -- Korax1214 (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose relevance/usefulness – flamurai 05:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice ass, no doubt about that. And otherwise? Also, there are the usual problems with personality rights, model release, model possible being underage etcetera. MartinD (talk) 13:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 support, 9 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured. --Simonizer (talk) 08:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]