Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Biological and technological scales compared-en.svg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 01:08:00

Info created by Guillaume Paumier, Philip Ronan, NIH, Artur Jan Fijałkowski, Jerome Walker, Michael David Jones, Tyler Heal, Mariana Ruiz, Science Primer (National Center for Biotechnology Information), Liquid_2003, Arne Nordmann & The Tango! Desktop Project - uploaded by Guillom - nominated by Mdd -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a bit of a mishmash of drawing techniques, but what is worse, there are also spelling mistakes! (e.g. crystalline). Lycaon (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Techniques used for representation are very different. Some very complex and very simple. I do not think that is the best way to represent --libertad0 ॐ (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't know what is meant by the illustration that says that "electromechanical ... microsystems" are between 2 and 40 micrometres. The text is very unclear. What systems are being referred to? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 result: 1 support, 3 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured (rule of the 5th day). Lycaon (talk) 08:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]