- Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- DarkAp89 Commons 18:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Maybe the detail is not the best, the composition is awesome. --Aktron (talk) 18:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Tintero (talk) 19:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Simonizer (talk) 10:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Good job. Phil13 (talk) 12:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Alvaro qc (talk) 16:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ok --Lestat (talk) 16:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- SupportAlbertus teolog (talk) 22:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, sorry, but it just ain't sharp enough. F3.5's simply too wide. --Aqwis (talk) 00:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Regrettably I have to agree with Aqwis --Dori - Talk 16:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, sorry, but it just ain't sharp enough. noisy--Beyond silence 20:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Nice composition, but not sharp enough. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support like it :) --Sailko (talk) 16:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support- Week Support. --Karelj (talk) 16:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Indeed not sharp enough and also some disturbing CA left (on the pulpit) and right. Lycaon (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Sharpness. Sorry. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- SupportTiago Vasconcelos (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
result: 12 supports, 6 opposes, 0 neutral => featured. Benh (talk) 12:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]