Open main menu

Copyright statusEdit

Sailko, do you know the copyright status of the works of Musei Capitolini? Thank you. Векочел (talk) 12:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Векочел they belong to the city administration of Rome. --Sailko (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
They release it to the public domain? Векочел (talk) 03:54, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Like any museum in italy I don't think they made any special release. --Sailko (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Mentre puoi mettere questo
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
 

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or less.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1924.

The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".
This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details.

quando è un lavoro artistico,ciao --Paris Orlando (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

QIEdit

Ciao,quando qualcuno in QI non fà quello che gli è stato richiesto puoi scrivere   Not done così non devi motivare troppo,grazie e buon lavoro --Paris Orlando (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Charles VI of FranceEdit

Hi Sailko, this is a small question regarding your imports of the Dialogues de Pierre Salmon (it was in 2009). These files are of exceptional importance because they are the very rare representations of King Charles VI of France during his lifetime. In addition, your cropping is used later in a considerable number of books and documentaries dedicated to this sovereign. To be able to upload these drawings, you had probably had access to the works located in the Bibliothèque de Genève and the Bibliothèque nationale de France. Knowing that the cropped version has a dimension of 848 × 1048 pixels, is it possible that the day you go back to these establishments (if you have the possibility), you can download a more complete version (this for example) with a much better resolution? If this materializes, it would be a great advance on the iconography of one of our most controversial kings (because I'm myself French, and it shows on my mediocre level in English). In any case, good continuation and I really like your work here and on the Wikipedia in Italian. --Ellicrum {bablute [...]} 23:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi User:Ellicrum! Thanks for your nice words. I just uploaded the image scanning from my text book, and I have no better image to upload. Good continuation to you too!! --Sailko (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

ArticoloEdit

L'articolo in inglese non si mette sui sostantivi che entrano da un'altra lingua, Sailko. Lo metti solo in inglese e solo dove l'istituzione ha nel suo nome ufficiale "The" oppure ha il sostantivo come qualificatore dell'istituzione e non è il suo nome proprio (per esempio, Alumni of Yale University, Yale è nome proprio; Alumni of the University of California, California è il qualificatore dell'università). -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Pure qui, guarda: la categoria è Museo civico archeologico (Bologna), ma poi le sottocategorie sono Collections of the Archeological Museum of Bologna‎ (che per carità è giusto, in questo caso il the ci vuole, ma è incoerente con la categoria madre, o è tutto Museo civico archeologico o è tutto Archeological (a parte che è Archaeological :-) ) Museum of Bologna :-) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Palazzo Piccolomini Bellanti in Pian e de' Mantellini, SienaEdit

Buona sera. Vengo a scusarmi con Lei, per quanto concerne il palazzo in oggetto, perché come si ricorderà se ne parlò a suo tempo. Le dissi che la famiglia Incontri non era una famiglia senese, e che tutti qui conoscono detto palazzo come Piccolomini Bellanti... La seconda parte è vera, la prima un po' meno. Ho scoperto che a Siena è esistita una famiglia nobile di nome Incontri, per cui ero, in buona fede in errore. Non so quali fossero le Sue fonti, ma potevano esser corrette. Le auguro una buona serata è scusi ancora. Guido Fineschi Sergardi (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Caricamento fotoEdit

Buona sera, ho caricato un file estratto da una Sua foto: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stemma_di_Domenico_Fineschi_da_Lamole.jpg. La userò per una pagina che creerò prossimamente. Grazie e buona serata. Guido Fineschi Sergardi (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Guido Fineschi Sergardi, va benissimo, licenza e citazione dell'autore sono a posto. Grazie --Sailko (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

@Sailko: Buon mattino, Le riporto il link della pagina ove ho caricato l'immagine: https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fineschi_(famiglia)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Guido Fineschi Sergardi (talk • contribs) 05:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The following files are interested by the mass-deletion request:

Italiano: Ciao, son capitato su una delle immagini di André Derain per caso e nel cercare di categorizzarla adeguatamente, ho scoperto che qui non possono essere conservate. Mi spiace di aver dovuto avviare la richiesta di cancellazione. Buon lavoro.
English: Hi, I've reached a painting of André Derain by chance. I was trying to categorize it when I discovered that it could not be uploaded here. I'm sorry to have to start the mass deletion request. Bie.
--Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Clotilde, regina dei FranchiEdit

Ciao, Sailko. Ti disturbo per segnalarti che ho chiesto aiuto al Bar italiano come segue:

Salve. Ho notato che questo file è usato in molte pagine di wikipedia nella voce dedicata a Clotilde (regina dei Franchi). Leggendo però la descrizione, non pare proprio che si tratti dello stesso personaggio: «Statue de la reine de Saba (précédemment identifiée à sainte Clotilde, reine des Francs, épouse de Clovis Ier[1]). Notre-Dame de Corbeil. XIIème siècle». Si può verificare e eventualmente sistemare? La stessa immagine è nelle voci in molte altre lingue; peccato, se è sbagliata. Grazie dell'attenzione e un cordiale saluto. --Antonella (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Puoi darmi una mano, per favore? Grazie in ogni caso. --Antonella (talk) 22:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Ciao, non l'ho caricato io, non saprei. --Sailko (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorryEdit

Hi, I saw one of your photos of a bust of Democritus File:Filosofo detto democrito, da villa dei papiri, peristilio quadrato.JPG. Because it was to dark, I made a new image changing the lighting on Photoshop. But when I was uploading it, I chose the original by mistake and now I can't change it. It was't my intention doing that, I'm really sorry. --Alvaro Marques Hijazo (talk) 00:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Alvaro Marques Hijazo No problem, we can restore the original file, but I think you improved the image so I will not. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Alessandro mendini per alchimia, la poltrona di proust, 1978 (riedizione 2003).JPGEdit

 
File:Alessandro mendini per alchimia, la poltrona di proust, 1978 (riedizione 2003).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

151.54.204.129 19:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Luciano baldessari, luminator bernocchi, X fiera internazionale di milano, 1929 (mi, casva) 01.jpgEdit

 
File:Luciano baldessari, luminator bernocchi, X fiera internazionale di milano, 1929 (mi, casva) 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Medals and coinsEdit

Hi ! Sorry for my mistake. The category tree of Commons is not good, with lot of categories with medals listed as subcategories from coins, such as Category:Medals by century or Category:Ancient Roman medals. I created the petscan request if you want to clean this up. Léna (talk) 17:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

User:Léna, thank you for understanding and fixing! --Sailko (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Foto di BoboliEdit

Ciao, grazie per il riordino. Quelle sono foto che avevo scattato in una visita frettolosa in cui mi mettevano premura, quindi la qualità è persino inferiore al mio solito. Vedo che molte se non tutte servono veramente a poco a fianco alle tue, quindi se lo ritieni opportuno mettiamole pure in cancellazione. Mi rimetto a te. Nemo 16:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Nemo ho soltanto sistemato un'attribuzione. Non preoccuparti, una statua, tanto più se esposta all'aperto, è bene documentarla anche in anni diversi. --Sailko (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Va bene! Se però trovi foto davvero troppo sfocate o sovraesposte che pensi non si possano vedere, mettile pure in immediata, non mi offendo. :) Nemo 20:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Non ne ho trovate, tranquillo ;) --Sailko (talk) 20:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - left nave - The Martyrdom of St Lawrence - Titian.jpg vs Tiziano, martirio di san lorenzo, 1588, 03.jpgEdit

Replacing a file labeled with a more unsafe file with false colors may be considered vandal. I hope we will not get angry for that. If you want you can come in VI to support your point of view. Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

User:Archaeodontosaurus I love your files, but this one has really a bad coulour rendering, and it is burned in the lower part. Mine is less reatuched, and the colour more realistic. There is just too much blue in your file, and you can easily cheack that from the other professional images of the painting in the category (WGA and Yorck). Titian in that part of his life used warm colours, that doesn't match with your file. I do not understand when you say "unsafe file". I just thought my file was better, once in a while, I think you should not be so impulsive to immediately revert everything. This can also be considered vandalism. You should have discussed first and maybe ask for somebody else's neutral opinion before. --Sailko (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
About the Valued images: you uploaded about 7000 nice images, and you found the time to make galleries all around and request Quality status for each of them. I uploaded 230000, and I barely have the time to retouch and upload them, but this does not mean all my images are worse than yours, just because I decided to use my time to do something else than proposing each of them. If I propose 10 per day I would probably finish in more than 60 years. So please do not use your "VI status" like a licence to overcome any other new image. --Sailko (talk) 18:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, We have the same ideal with some differences on how to apprehend it, we are not enemies at all. You asked me one day how we could progress, I am convinced that we must do less, but better. If I propose to come in VI is because it is a discipline that imposes a control with a vote of the community. It's time that is not lost.

The only thing: avoid potential conflicts by talking. We know each other by our work and we have a common problem: time management. Let's avoid losing it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Uso errato della cancellazione immediataEdit

‎Secondo la legge italiana, tutti i diritti di copyright appartenenti alla pubblica amministrazione italiana hanno una durata massima di solo venti anni. Questo è riportato proprio nel COM:FOP Italy che hai erroneamente utilizzato per giustificare la cancellazione immediata di diversi file. Io ho notato la cosa poiché avevo tra gli osservati i file nella Category:Fontana La Nave, alcuni dei quali sono già stati erroneamente cancellati. In passato, il tuo stesso dubbio ha portato altri utenti a proporre la cancellazione di file rappresentati l'opera; sottolineo, hanno proposto la cancellazione tramite discussione (non in immediata) la quale ha poi chiarito i dubbi (vedi Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Nave di Cascella, Pescara (2).jpg). Ti invito, pertanto, a rimuovere i tag per la cancellazione immediata laddove inseriti erroneamente. Saluti, --Earthh (talk) 21:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Specifico, la nave di Cascella fu commissionata dal Comune di Pescara e costruita nel 1987. Essendo di proprietà della pubblica amministrazione, i diritti di copyright hanno una durata di venti anni. Questo ci permette di caricare immagini rappresentati suddetta opera qui su commons, in regola con quanto dice COM:FOP Italy.--Earthh (talk) 22:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
In più, quando si candidano file per la cancellazione immediata, i loro autori dovrebbero essere notificati. Io, personalmente, non sono stato notificato e se non avessi controllato gli osservati molti file sarebbero stati erroneamente cancellati.--Earthh (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Avvisare gli utentiEdit

Ti ricordo che se segnali una pagina per la cancellazione, devi avvisare l'utente. Nel caso di File:Teatro della Germinazione ad Avezzano.jpg e degli altri, meglio aprire una DR regolare, così poi si recuperano. Ti lascio avviare, mentre faccio il resto. --Ruthven (msg) 13:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

PS: alla fine ho fatto io. Ricordati che per il FoP non si segnala la cancellazione immediata, ma va aperta una regolare procedura. --Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Santo spirito, cappella petrini arrighi, il passignano, martirio di san lorenzo (1602).JPGEdit

è il martirio di Stefano protomartire; errore di etichettatura probabilmente. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Archaeodontosaurus, giusta osservazione, ho corretto :) --Sailko (talk) 15:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Caricamento foto in CommonsEdit

Ciao, ti chiedo se puoi risolvermi questo quesito, proposto al Bar ma senza risposta: il Decreto Legge 31 maggio 2014 n. 83 ("decreto cultura") consente liberamente, se non erro, "la riproduzione di beni culturali" nei musei pubblici e privati italiani e "la divulgazione delle immagini legittimamente acquisite con qualsiasi mezzo". Chiedo cortesemente se le immagini da me acquisite direttamente nei musei possono essere pubblicate in Wikimedia Commons e con quale licenza. Grazie. --Teseo () 07:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Utente:Teseo se si tratta di un museo statale puoi caricarle aggiungendo in ciascuna immagine questo template: {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}}. Per gli altri musei puoi chiedere un'autorizzazione, oppure caricarli a tuo rischio. Ciao --Sailko (talk) 18:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:Augustinus (painter)Edit

Hello.The name is not clear so please write the full name or create the category yourself.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected file:Bucarest, arco di trionfo.JPG. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Jan hendrick weissembruch, bassa marea a zeeland, scheveningen, 1900 ca.jpg and recent photosEdit

Dear Sailko,

Thank you for your photographs! I notice that you put only your own name in the Author field, not the artist (which you put in the file name, without capitals I think). * Could you please for the sake of the database and lookup ease mention the artist in the author field? (For instance using the {{Creator:..}} template? A photographer of an existing work of art is not a creator, if the representation has no original properties.) Thank you, greetings from the Netherlands, Hansmuller (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Hansmuller hello. I am sorry, I upload thousands of images and if the upload wizards deosn't allow me to do that directly, I cannot make it manual for each image. This is a problem I already know, that many users noticed, and that nobody seems able to fix. It would be enough if the Wizard would fill the field "Photographer" instead of "Author" for self-published works. I tried to request some modifcation in phabricator, but it was just a frustrating experience, so I am not going to make any other request there, sorry. If you want to try you have all my support. I neverthless think that it's quite obvious from the category and the filename that I'm not a painter or a sculptor, I am just the photographer. Cheers. --Sailko (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Sailko, thanks for your answer. I use the elegant Pattypan (or formerly GlamWikiToolset) and uploaded some 280.000 images where i could differentiate between for example artist and photographer (as in the fields in Template Artwork that you used for Jan Hendrik Weissenbruch, for instance) and more. (When we nevertheless use UploadWizard, we can still easily indicate explicitly description, artist (in Author) and photographer (in Source, say {{own}}).) By the way, titles in Italian will not be understood by many readers. Please give it a try as you are a prolific user, thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 11:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
User:Hansmuller, I already tried Pattypan and it is not good for me. It is a lot of extra copy and paste, and it is not versatile enough when I upload at the same time cityscapes, architecture or artworks. But most important I mostly upload from my job, and here I cannot download, I can only use online resources. Writing filenames already takes me hours and hours (plus many hours to shot, many many many many hours to manually retouch each image and finally upload), I think I do enough. Maybe one day upload wizard will be smart enought to understand automatically all the infos I already provide. I see there are many users who improve my files with templates and extra categories, I appreciate but it's not the job I like to do. About the Italian language, as I arrived to Commons the only available art photos were from the Yorck Project, with captation in German only. So If Commons accepted that, I thought they should also accept my Italian filenames, and that's it. As I can see from the stats there is no other people in the world, besides me, who uploaded more that 200k self-made and self-retouched images here, and whenever I asked for some help, making the Wizard more efficient and useful for what I do, nobody ever cared, and it was very frustrating as I had to discuss with people who maybe uploaded 200 files in their life. So I'm sorry but I am not going to do more because of faults in the uploading system. I just had some extra time I'd rather make better use of the images into the Wikimedia projects, and possibly get more valued/quality image status. --Sailko (talk) 11:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Giovan Battista PaggiEdit

Hello Sailko, are you sure that "your" paintings are from Giovan? - They are "2 Giovan(ni) Battista Paggi": 1. un pittore manierista italiano: Category:Giovanni Battista Paggi - e un architetto barocco italiano: [Category:Giovan Battista Paggi]. - I think the paintings are from Giovanni, not Giovan. - P.S. Can you begin in your private files with your private category:Photographs by User:Sailko ??? [I know you love it, but I hate it to find category:Photographs by User:Sailko between the others]. I think worldwide we write (and add categories) from top to bottom. Adelfrank (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello Adelfrank! Thanks for all the fixes you are doing on files! Please remeber that before 1800s there was no registry office for names, so a LOT of graphic variation were possible and very common. The name Giovanni Battista (from John the Baptist) could be written "Giovan Battista", "Giambattista", "Gianbattista", "Gian Battista", "Battista", "Gio Batta" and many many more, but it is always the same name. In books and captations I can show you many examples of graphic variation on the same person's name. As regards Commons I think we have a standard to mostly use the fully extended names, like "Giovanni Battista", in categories, but we have to be a little flexible, as files can use one of the possible variants. By the way, about "Paggi" I have to be mnore careful in which category it ends. Maybe those categories need a further check, we may decide to divinde into "Giovanni Battista Paggi (architect)" and "Giovanni Battista Paggi (painter)". Thank you 👍 --Sailko (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
As regards the cats position it does not depend on me, but from Upload Wizard and HotCat. It is not my fault sorry! You can see if a bot can help you to move it to the end. I think you shopuld try to use HotCat too, it makes averything simple when you work with categories! --Sailko (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Category:Giovan Battista Paggi (time: 1659-1684) and Category:Giovanni Battista Paggi (1554-1627) are one man??? And this is only a joke?: Giovan Battista Paggi (Roma, notizie fra il 1659 e il 1684) è stato un architetto barocco italiano. Non va confuso con il pittore manierista Giovanni Battista Paggi (Genova, 1554-1627). - And here is this triptychon not a painting, only a fresco? [[1]] - I have no other questions, thanks a lot. Adelfrank (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I fixed both, thank you --Sailko (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Fine, you have the time to delete all my works, it's o.k. - But what do you think about your own works? - In Category:Madonna dell'Umiltà (Pistoia) - Interior are some old pics, what do you think if you see this e.g.: File:Pistoia, madonna dell'umiltà, cupola 03.JPG or File:Pistoia, madonna dell'umiltà, cappella 02.JPG? Do you do'nt like to delete they too? Adelfrank (talk) 16:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Adelfrank I didn't delete any image of yours, I just replaced the Frescos category inside the paintings, because this is where they are normally in any commons category tree. I made a new set of images about Basilica dell'Umiltà (Pistoia), so if you want to delete old blurry pictures you have my total support. --Sailko (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I tried to speedy delete both.. hope they will accept ;) --Sailko (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Pistoia, madonna dell'umiltà, cappella 01.JPGEdit

 
File:Pistoia, madonna dell'umiltà, cappella 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Adelfrank (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Pistoia, madonna dell'umiltà, cupola 02.JPGEdit

 
File:Pistoia, madonna dell'umiltà, cupola 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Adelfrank (talk) 18:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Sailko".