Support -- It is an interesting and in itself valuable review system where a good review requires looking at the other images that are available here, researching what the information being conveyed is and not necessarily about personal expectations of images. -- carol (tomes) 02:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support For once, I admit I am biased;-) I think it is high quality vector graphics work well illustrating the intention of using the seal. "V" for value (value also begins with v in many other languages). The golden colors for something precious and valuable. Visual caviar when seen large, still recognizeable as a seal when seen tiny as here . The seal has been developed over several iterations based on feedback from this Community discussing it purpose thoroughly. Awesome! -- Slaunger21:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The purpose was to choose a seal for a classification system (of which I doubt the efficiency), not to consider the result is featurable. Nothing extraordinary in this good work. --B.navez10:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work done, and the image can also be used for other non-wiki projects as a indication for value due to its understandability. Muhammad19:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose what's next, the Wikipedia logo? + per above diego_pmc
Comment Not that I have researched this, but I think that the wikipedia logo has some copyright restrictions which would disallow it to be nominated here. -- carol (tomes) 16:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]