Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 04 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Mailbox_in_Lampovo_1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mailbox in Lampovo --Reda Kerbouche 12:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Sorry, insufficient quality (low level of detail). --PantheraLeo1359531 13:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree in this case, level of detail is OK, some additional sharpening could be applied, for me it reaches barely QI level. --Tuxyso 19:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think it's not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 07:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough. --LexKurochkin 10:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 12:37, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Sanspareil_Regenschirmfelsen-20210214-RM-153602.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Umbrella Rock in the Sanspareil Rock Garden in Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 13:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose null --Túllio F 19:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Lots of shade --Túllio F 19:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Fill-in flash would have raised the detail in the shade. Rodhullandemu 08:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK with me. What's so bad about shade? -- Ikan Kekek 08:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support The shadow is not accidential (I mean, by a passer-by or car …), it belongs to the rocks, and it makes the light falling through the opening much more impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Very high contrast very well managed. I don't see a loss in detail. --Smial 09:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Well done. Subject is represented very authentically. Direct sunlight is not typical here. --Milseburg 12:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial --LexKurochkin 13:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --LexKurochkin 07:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)