Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 05 2015

Consensual review

edit

File:2014_Erywań,_Park_przy_Kaskadach_(11).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Park on the way to Cascade. Yerevan, Armenia. --Halavar 23:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment its tilted ccw. --Hubertl 07:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me now. --Hubertl 08:59, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm not quite convinced - the background focus is problematic - too sharp to not be distracting, too blurred to be the subject. --Mattbuck 09:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Mattbuck --Code 05:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined Code 07:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Erywań,_Park_przy_Kaskadach_(14).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Park on the way to Cascade. Yerevan, Armenia. --Halavar 23:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support Not the best quality, but ok in my opinion. --Hubertl 07:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
      Oppose Sorry, but it needs perspective correction and at least a bit sharpening. --Hockei 17:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC)   Neutral Better. --Hockei (talk) 10:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Halavar, won´t you do this slight perspective correction? --Hubertl 17:59, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done Sorry for the delay. I uploaded now new fixed version. Hope it's good now. --Halavar 23:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 08:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Rapture-2.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Rapture Beim dark Munich Festival 2014 --Pistenwolf 08:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Noisy --Daniel Case 05:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I do not agree with that, because it is not possible to shoot concerts under live conditions without some noisy. In this case i dont see much noisy.--Pistenwolf (talk) 08:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Acceptable noise for concert photo. One of the good ones of this kind here in QI from view of composition. Please resolve the redlink category. --Cccefalon 11:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
I revoke my support, as it seems, that you are not willing to resolve the redlink category. --Cccefalon 04:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very poor quality in my opinion. A concert photo does not necessarily has to be like this. Alvesgaspar 21:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose poor quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose --Steindy 23:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you very much for the Review. For me the term "Poor Quality" or "Very Poor Quality " alone is not really meaningful and sould be justified. --Pistenwolf (talk) 11:15, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support The same like Cccefalon Hilarmont 14:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
  • {{o}} Nice. Noise could be artistic, but I don't like the composition. Guitarrist and right area are too disturbing IMO--Lmbuga 17:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC).   weak support sorry: Nice and expressive--Lmbuga 20:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Difficult lighting, great shot. -- Smial 10:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 20:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Common_pheasant_(Phasianus_colchicus)_cock.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) cock, Otmoor RSPB Reserve, Oxfordshire --Charlesjsharp 23:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose no good crop, the feathers are cut.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
    *   Comment It's not actually cropped. I left out a small portion of the tail as it allows the main body and head of the bird to be more in close up
  •   Oppose Good, but the tail, cropped out, is disturbing--Lmbuga 17:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 20:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Iguana iguana, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 03.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Captive Iguana iguana, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta --Crisco 1492 02:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Head does not seem to be in focus. --Charlesjsharp 13:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Agree, focus is more on the creature's belly, but I think it's enough. Crisco 1492 09:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support yes for me too --Christian Ferrer 19:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overall unsharpness. Alvesgaspar 21:59, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough.--Jebulon 09:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 20:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)