Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 25 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Neues_Rathaus_in_Hannover_in_3D_4.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Neues Rathaus in Hanover in April 2019 in 3D --C.Suthorn 16:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for now. It's tilted. --Podzemnik 21:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Also a bad composition, branches in front of such a beautiful Rathaus --Michielverbeek 07:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose by Podzemnik and Michielverbeek. BTW: have you ever thought about a crossview presentation, so we could see this without technical gear? --PtrQs (talk) 11:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Michielverbeek.--Fischer.H 17:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
    •   Comment The file conforms to the jps-file format (meant to store 3D files). Commons does not support the jps-file-extension, but you can rename it locally and than a jps-viewer, that supports cross-eye view will be able to show or print a cross-eye version. I do not know of a file-extension for cross-eye. It is of course (without rename) possible to send the image to a 3DTV-TVset, than manually press the "3D"-button on the remote, or to use VR googles. Cardboard googles can be made DIY, have been given away for free with computer, gamer and media magazines, are available for 1 Euro at Euroshop. --C.Suthorn (talk) 12:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Moskva-5.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Camera "Moskva-5". --Dmitry Makeev 09:23, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   OpposeI disagree. Please upload a better resolution. --XRay 06:42, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good for me -- Spurzem 15:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment It would be helpful to have the EXIF info... the resolution isn't very high for a modern-day studio shot.--Peulle 17:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 22:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Buddhism_08.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Leu Pagoda - Cambodia. --Dmitry Makeev 07:08, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose I disagree. The file needs a meaningful name, better categorisation and description, I'm not really sure what we see here --Podzemnik 21:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
      Comment I think it also needs straightening upright, unfortunately this would crop the top. Acabashi 10:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose blown sky, tilted Seven Pandas 15:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Peulle 17:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Buddhism_04_budda.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Preah Vihea Temple - Cambodia. --Dmitry Makeev 07:06, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 16:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose I disagree. The file needs a meaningful name, better categorisation and description, I'm not really sure what we see here --Podzemnik 21:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Bad crop at the top --Michielverbeek 07:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose no quality picture for me.--Fischer.H 17:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Peulle 17:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Indian_Army_logo_at_National_War_Memorial.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Indian Army logo at National War Memorial, New Delhi By User:KCVelaga --Eatcha 13:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Please check your image. The label contains a wikilink (structured data), color noise, sharpness could be improved, tilted CCW. --XRay 05:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. @Websteralive: You can't promote the image. There are several issues. You should wait until these issues are fixed. Sorry, but it isn't polite to ignore my review. --XRay 05:24, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per XRay.--Peulle 17:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Indian_Armed_Forces_(Triservices)_logo_at_National_War_Memorial.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Indian Armed Forces (Triservices) logo at National War Memorial, New Delhi By User:KCVelaga --Eatcha 13:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 16:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. Not sharp enough for an easy to take photo --Podzemnik 21:30, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The lighting isn't very good either.--Peulle 17:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Major_Somnath_Sharma_statue_at_Param_Yodha_Sthal_Delhi.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Major Somnath Sharma's statue By User:KCVelaga --Eatcha 13:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 16:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. Not sharp enough for an easy to take photo --Podzemnik 21:30, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Podzemnik.--Peulle 17:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Captain_Vikram_Batra_statue_at_Param_Yodha_Sthal_Delhi.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Captain Vikram Batra's statue at Param Yodha Sthal By User:KCVelaga --Eatcha 13:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      OpposeI disagree. Crop at the top is not acceptable, bust should be centered and the photograph should be sharp. --XRay 09:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose per XRay --Piotr Bart 23:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Also per Xray --Michielverbeek 07:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose The bust is not sharp. --Aristeas 09:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Peulle 17:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Anser_anser.002_-_Culleredo.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Anser anser (greylag goose) in Fonteculler (Culleredo, A Coruña, Galicia, España). --Drow male 11:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 16:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. CAs should be removed. --XRay 10:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose CA, lack of sharpness.--Peulle 17:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Anser anser rubrirostris.003 - Culleredo.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Anser anser (greylag goose) in Fonteculler (Culleredo, A Coruña, Galicia, España). --Drow male 11:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 16:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. Not sharp enough --Podzemnik 21:30, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Indeed, not sharp enough --Michielverbeek 07:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Peulle 17:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Pavo_cristatus_(Parque_Quevedo).104_-_Leon.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Pavo cristatus (Indian peafowl) in Parque Quevedo (León, Spain). --Drow male 09:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose For my taste the color is to pale. I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 20:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose per Spurzem - looks washed out, and not very sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle 00:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but sharpness is below all limits. Maybe you should check for a (processing) problem in your technical system. --PtrQs 00:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 07:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Pavo_cristatus_(Parque_Quevedo).105_-_Leon.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Pavo cristatus (Indian peafowl) in Parque Quevedo (León, Spain). --Drow male 09:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose No QI for me. The picture is too pale for my taste and the fence (?) at the left disturbs. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Spurzem.--Ermell 19:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose +1. --Peulle 00:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 07:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Audi_e-tron,_GIMS_2019,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(GIMS9998).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Audi e-tron at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 07:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Websteralive 16:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I assume the car is white. But it seems a bit too dark in the picture. Besides, the man with the shopping bags (?) disturbs a lot. I ask to discuss -- Spurzem 20:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
    Mild   Oppose per Spurzem. Doesn't seem like the right time or right settings for the shot. -- Ikan Kekek 06:50, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment fixed the exposure. --MB-one 13:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - The car is a lot better, so the file would be fine except for the person behind the car. I'm not sure how strongly I feel about this, so I've removed my opposing vote and will let others determine whether they think the composition is OK for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 22:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose People. --Yann 04:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Yann 04:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Black_cat,_green_eyes.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Black cat. --Dmitry Makeev 16:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Eatcha 17:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Disturbing reflection in the eyes. --Berthold Werner 18:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Not so bothered about the reflections, that's natural, but the top crop is jarring. Half an ear? Rodhullandemu 00:06, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Rodhullandemu. -- Ikan Kekek 06:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Rodhullandemu. --MB-one 10:38, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per above.--Peulle 11:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose What a pity - the iris looks phantastic, but the reflection completely spoils it. --PtrQs 00:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you all for the comments. I will try to repeat. --Dmitry Makeev 22:20, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 07:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:1934_Riley_Kestrel_1100_Saloon_at_Capel_Manor,_Enfield,_London,_England_2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 1934 Riley Kestrel. --Acabashi 08:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Eatcha 09:16, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Car in the shade with much too bright windshield. The photo is not a quality picture in my opinion. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 12:47, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment The part below the car is a bit too dark, but not beyond salvation. The windscreen is fine IMO. --MB-one 20:12, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Dmitry Makeev 09:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 19:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good Quality --PtrQs 00:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Ciconia_ciconia.103_-_Valverde_de_la_Virgen_(Leon).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ciconia ciconia (white stork) on the Church of Santa Engracia, in Valverde de la Virgen (León, Spain).
    --Drow male 07:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Eatcha 14:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for now. A lot of CA, quite unsharp. --Podzemnik 21:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
    • I uploaded an Improved Version -- Eatcha 16:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 06:38, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - CA at the branches should still be removed, however.--Ermell 19:06, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good for me if I see many other QIs -- Spurzem 20:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Rather unsharp, strong blue fringing around the tail feathers. --PtrQs 00:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The body looks good but the head is in shadow and unsharp Poco a poco 10:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A lot of CA --Fischer.H 17:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)