Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 27 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Erg_Chebbi_in_the_evening_light.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination the sand dunes of Erg Chebbi at sunset --Snowmanstudios 06:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment Several dust spots are visible in the sky on the left and in the center of the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 07:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Fair composition but the colors seem oversaturated --Basile Morin 04:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
    •   Done Fixed the dust spots; yes, it is a hdr-image... I lowered the saturation, looks much better now.--Snowmanstudios 16:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
      •   Comment Still, the color space of the picture is uncalibrated, which means the colors display randomly. Saturation reduced but with more than one picture presented through HDR manipulation, I think an indication on the file page like {{HDR image}} for example is necessary -- Basile Morin 01:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
        • As has been discussed here, the "uncalibrated" color space is a limitation of the EXIF Standard (only two values: sRBG and uncalibrated) and does not mean colours are displayed randomly. Current platforms read the ICCProfileName tag (which, for this file, is defined as Adobe RGB) to correctly display non-SRGB images. --Julesvernex2 18:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 07:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

File:20160604T095017_norwegen-ms1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Cruise vessels in Geiranger Fjord, Norway. By User:Hgrobe --Yann 11:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ximonic 17:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Lack of detail --Virtual-Pano 17:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support ok for me.--Ermell 06:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support A bit soft, but by far good enough for an A4-Size print. --Smial 09:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Level of detail is too low here. --Augustgeyler 10:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine for me. BigDom 13:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 07:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Would be better with more sharpness, but QI for me. --Halavar 16:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. Good composition, but the white ship is too bright and not so sharp as it perhaps could be. -- Spurzem 20:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 19:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

File:M019F001_Deckenlicht_im_Vulkan_im_Wörlitzer_Park.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Glass dome with yellow stained glass in the artificial volcano "Vesuvius" at Wörlitzer Park. --Augustgeyler 08:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Too dark especially at the left. -- Spurzem 08:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Still too dark. Blurry, too. --Palauenc05 10:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
    •   Info This room in an artificial volcano was build to be very dark. There is only this dark yellow window at the top to only let in some little light even on bright days. Additionally it should be taken into account, that this image was shot on film and the digitalization with high resolution might appear blurry at hundred 100 percent. So I'd like to ask for more opinions. --Augustgeyler 06:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me. Interesting effect. -- Ikan Kekek 07:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The picture is called "Glass dome with yellow stained glass". But nothing or very little can be seen of the dome. You basically only see the yellow rosette. -- Spurzem 16:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Good enough for QI IMO, and, yes, interesting subject and composition --LexKurochkin 08:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice composition. -- Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 17:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --August Geyler (talk) 19:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC)