Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 30 2015

Consensual review

edit

File:Altun_Ha_Belize_6.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Front of Structure B4 (Temple of the Sun God/Temple of the masonry altars) at Altun Ha archeological site, Belize --Denis Barthel 00:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Comment IMO too much green in the front.--XRay 16:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC) XRay, I'd appreciate your advice how one could photograph this without this amount of green in the front as we have a pretty wide, but not as high object here, which doesn't fit in a 2:3-picture in another way. Thank you, Denis Barthel 21:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
* IMO 2:3 is not necessary. My suggestion: one third green, two thirds building. --XRay 17:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  Done - cropped per User:XRay, though I still think it's strange ... :) Denis Barthel 00:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  Support IMO OK now.--XRay 15:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI to me, even if I think XRay is right --DKrieger 20:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Meerdere ballonnen gelijktijdig in de lucht tijdens de Jaarlijkse Friese ballonfeesten in Joure 14.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Several balloons simultaneously in the air during the Hot Air Balloon Festival in Joure province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
    Famberhorst 04:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose To much background. Denis Barthel 16:16, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree, the background is inherent part of this composition. --Hubertl 07:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Σπάρτακος 13:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay 18:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

File:15-07-13-Teotihuacan-La-Ciudadela-RalfR-WMA_0108.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination detail of La Ciudadela, Teotihuacan , Mexico --Ralf Roletschek 09:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 04:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Purple fringing on edge, description very vague. Denis Barthel 16:35, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree with Denis Barthel.--Jebulon 19:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 04:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

File:San_Lorenzo_in_Lucina_(Rome)_-_Interior_HDR.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination San Lorenzo in Lucina (Rome) - Interior HDR --Livioandronico2013 07:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose There are some issues to be fixed: Strong magenta CA at the windows and too dark overall. Livio, if you could provide me the RAW files, I would try to create a better HDR result. The church is one of my favourites in Rome and the exposures seem to be good. --Code 09:07, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Definitely too dark (esp. for a HDR), and the brigther areas are overexposed Poco a poco 12:11, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Much better, supporting now Poco a poco 10:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 09:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)