Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 23 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Cráter_Stóri_Grábrók,_Vesturland,_Islandia,_2014-08-15,_DD_089.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Stóri Grábrók crater, Vesturland, Iceland --Poco a poco 12:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Comment Lens/perspective distortions. Especially the right side is leaning to the right. --Halavar 12:54, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
      Done Poco a poco 16:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
    Better, but still distorsion exist. Right side of the horizon should be raised to the top. --Halavar 00:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
      New version going further with the perspective correction Poco a poco 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
      Comment Sorry, but I think others should decide. --Halavar 20:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
    You lost me, why that? do you still see any issues? Poco a poco 10:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
    There is still the same issue - right side looks unnatural according to use of fish eye lens. There is too much lens/perspective distortions. But that is only my personal opinion. Maybe the image is good. I think CR should be started. --Halavar 12:02, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support This is acceptable for me. The areas of primary importance are fine and the other defects are relatively minor. Ram-Man 17:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 22:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Detalle_en_Ventana_del_Teatro_Municipal_de_São_Paulo.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Detalle en Ventana del Teatro Municipal de São Paulo --The Photographer 11:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review Overall good quality but please get the window bars rectilinear. --Cccefalon 11:51, 7 December 2014 (UTC)::I cant see any problem. Please See notes --The Photographer 11:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
      Info I helped you with an annotation to see the problem. --Cccefalon 17:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
    I am sorry, i cant underestand how your notes could be a mistake --The Photographer 18:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
    The Photographer, I cannot believe that you deny that the yellow bar is inclined to the right side?! --Cccefalon 19:01, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
    IMHO The joints of windows is indicating whether or not inclined, not the design. --The Photographer 10:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
    Since we do not know the window bars, we can not assess the linearity as well (I seem not to be all straight). For me it is an excellent photo and therefore QI. --Steindy 18:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Sure, we do know the layout of the venetian windows. You can for example watch this image. Clearly inclinced. --Cccefalon 14:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support As above, good quality. --Steindy 11:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Most of the tilt comes from the drawing itself. Good enough. Alvesgaspar 12:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Cccefalon--Livioandronico2013 22:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 22:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Interior_of_Municipal_Teatro_of_São_Paulo.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Interior of Municipal Teatro of São Paulo --The Photographer 11:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Comment Green and purple CAs at the windows to the left. --C messier 16:43, 7 December 2014 (UTC), thanks, could you add notes please? --The Photographer 11:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)  Oppose   Not done --C messier 18:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    I can not detect any CAs also at 150% magnification. Let us discuss. --Steindy 18:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, as critcised there are some small visible artifacts in the stained glass windows, but in 100% view they are not really disturbing. QI for me. Difficult lighting situation very well handled, colors look naturally. -- Smial 11:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The image is very good but as C messier already mentioned, there is a disturbing magenta CA at the left door opening rod. Can be easily fixed and I will happily provide my support then. --Cccefalon 14:40, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 23:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Steindy 10:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose CA along the iron of the side windows. And some chromatic noise, sorry. I know how it is difficult to manage light in this case...--Jebulon 10:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry,Per Cccefalon --Livioandronico2013 22:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Livioandronico2013 22:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)