Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 09 2016
-
- Nomination Museo de Sitio Huaca Rajada - Sipán, Peru --Bgag 04:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skeleton of a sentry in the tomb of the Lord of Sipán, Huaca Rajada, Peru --Bgag 04:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 48 Market Square in Paczków --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of All Saints in Stary Paczków 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of All Saints in Stary Paczków 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 01:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of All Saints in Stary Paczków 4 --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 01:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roof figure Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, Austria --Hubertl 23:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maria-Theresia monument, artist: Kaspar von Zumbusch (errected 1874-1888), side figure --Hubertl 23:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subfossil shell of a landsnail of Porto Santo Island, Caseolus bowdichianus --Llez 20:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination West gate of the Roman east fort of Welzheim on UNESCO Upper German-Raetian Limes World Heritage Site, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 20:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Faniteum, Karmelitinnenkloster By User:Haeferl --Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline I'm very sorry, but it's too noisy and blurred for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 23:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ehem. Bürgerliches Zeughaus, Feuerwehrzentrale. By User:Haeferl --Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 20:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Türnitz mit Blick auf die kath. Pfarrkirche hl. Martin By User:Haeferl --Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharp enough, not too noisy, good perspective a Q1one --Michielverbeek 00:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The John Fitzgerald Kennedy Memorial in Dallas, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 19:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Not a difficult photo to make, but it's well done and sharp enough to a Q1one --Michielverbeek 19:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bildstock 3 von 4 eines ehemaligen Kreuzwegs in Velen. By User:Rwgwiki --XRay 18:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waves at S'Estanyol, Badia d'Alcúdia, Majorca --Llez 16:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inscriptions at roman quarry. --F. Riedelio 16:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Omkromte Broek, gemeente De Fryske Marren in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 16:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 16:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Omkromte Broek, gemeente De Fryske Marren in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea. Location, Catspoele.
--Famberhorst 16:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 16:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea. Location, Catspoele.
-
- Nomination Volgograd: airport terminal building --A.Savin 15:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volgograd: Profsouznaya station of Metrotram --A.Savin 15:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Some parts of the image are a little dark, but I think overall it is worthy of QI status. --Michael Barera 19:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volgograd: Komsomolskaya station of Metrotram --A.Savin 15:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline I don't think it is quite sharp enough in the foreground. Sorry. --Michael Barera 19:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Notre-Dame of Guadalupe Church, Pacasmayo, Peru --Bgag 15:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rotterdam-NL, sculpture near Erasmus bridge --Michielverbeek 15:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leuvenhaven (Rotterdam)-NL, monumental crane --Michielverbeek 14:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality: Left buildings tilt to the right. --F. Riedelio 16:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leuvehaven (Rotterdam)-NL, footbridge --Michielverbeek 14:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 15:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rotterdam-NL, bridge: de Willemsbrug --Michielverbeek 14:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 15:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rotterdam-NL, de Oude Haven (old port in the center) --Michielverbeek 14:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slovenia, Ljubljana, Urbanc House at Prešeren Square --Berthold Werner 12:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall at night, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 11:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion An excellent night photo from a town where I have been before, very sharp, low ISO, long exposure time, high f-value, only the streetlights are reflecting a bit --Michielverbeek 11:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arbatskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 10:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion However it is not very sharp I think it is a Q1one. I did not realize before exposure time is very long 1/20 and ISO500 is very high; it might be an improvement to use a standard and/or a lower ISO-value --Michielverbeek 11:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Oh thanx, it is really GREAT advise! --Florstein 12:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Breidenbach --Hydro 09:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Very much noise resp. artefacts on sky, +too tight crop on the top --A.Savin 15:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Yes, too tight crop. --Hydro 18:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bạc Liêu city view --Shansov.net 07:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 15:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glass window in the church St.Otto in Bamberg --Ermell 07:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in the parish church St.Otto in Bamberg --Ermell 07:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion In first instance the photo did not impressed me, but when I look much better to the image I get the feeling I am just standing in front of the statue - a Q1one --Michielverbeek 08:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief of an angel with a lute in the Otto Church in Bamberg --Ermell 07:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Saint Nicholas in the parish church St.Otto in Bamberg --Ermell 07:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Printing of water droplets into ice Jonker Sloot. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
--Famberhorst 07:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Printing of water droplets into ice Jonker Sloot. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Slide at the pool of the bath "Aquarell" in Haltern am See at night, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful mood. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tawau, Sabah: Stesen Janakuasa Kubota (Kubota Power Station) --Cccefalon 06:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Itoman, Okinawa, Japan: Okinawa Peace Memorial Hall and Clocktower. --Cccefalon 06:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miao-Li, Taiwan: Guesthouse of Quanhua Temple --Cccefalon 06:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Shansov.net 06:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Xinyi, Nantou County, Taiwan: Petrol pump at CCPC Petrol Station. --Cccefalon 06:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tawau, Sabah: Marker Stone of Onika Quarry at Sin On Hill --Cccefalon 06:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) above Vens, Valle d'Aosta.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Some magenta CA to be removed, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 06:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Done Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) above Vens, Valle d'Aosta.
-
- Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination The bridge over the Aude River. Coursan, Aude, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality en Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge to the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island"), part of the Promenadenbad, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Promenadenbad on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Could be rotated a tad cw. --Cccefalon 06:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks, Uwe, for your promotion. I rotated the image cw a tad and uploaded a revised file. --Johann Jaritz 08:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reeds at the lakeside of the frozen bay of Lake Woerth on the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion CAs in the branches at top (left and middle) --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks, Christian, for discovering that issue. I mended the CAs and uploaded this topped version. --Johann Jaritz 07:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bench with view at the Lake Woerth on the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View at Maria Woerth from the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 44 Market Square in Paczków 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 48 Market Square in Paczków 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 48 Market Square in Paczków 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rotterdam-NL, prewar bridge --Michielverbeek 22:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --A.Savin 15:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leuvehaven (Rotterdam)-NL, foot bridge --Michielverbeek 22:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Even for the early evening it´s a bit too dark. But this one is ok! I don´t understand the difference in brightness between your first and last upload!!--Hubertl 14:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Comment sky colour is not dirty --Michielverbeek 14:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rotterdam-NL, shopping mall --Michielverbeek 22:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 12:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Najad, Fountain A, Artist: Anton Schmidgruber. --Hubertl 20:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Franz Exner (1802-1853), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 20:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow: Marushkino settlement, aerial photo --A.Savin 13:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rapunzel and Flynn Rider a in the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 11:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Nice work! --Michael Barera 19:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guard of the Red Queen from Alice in Wonderland at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 11:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Michael Barera 19:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Disney Character illustrating Pinocchio at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 11:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Michael Barera 19:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spheniscus humboldti (Humboldt Penguin) in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. -- Medium69 11:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crypt of the Cathedral Church of St. Maria and St. Stephan. --F. Riedelio 10:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 14:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tomb slab of Rudolf I of Germany. --F. Riedelio 10:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 14:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bellver Castle: Tower and gate --F. Riedelio 16:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit noisy sky, but good enogh for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yelizavetpol Gate/Ganja Gate. Shusha fortress. Shushi/Shusha, Nagorno-Karabakh. --Halavar 12:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guard of the Red Queen from Alice in Wonderland at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality: Cut off feet --F. Riedelio 15:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Xinyi, Nantou County, Taiwan: Restaurant in Xinyi Village --Cccefalon 05:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Unfortunately a cloudy sky, but happily sharp enough for a Q1one --Michielverbeek 07:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Water tank, Santiponce, Seville, Spain --Poco a poco 14:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Review There are dust spots at the left, also, clipped white at the left, I'm not sure if it is QIthis way, maybe reprocess possible --A.Savin 16:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cultural Fashion from Uganda. By User:Nikonambassug --Touzrimounir 10:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Good but tilted cw Poco a poco 20:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC) - Decline No response after 8 days --Hubertl 14:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Cultural Fashion from Uganda. By User:Nikonambassug --Touzrimounir 10:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nairobi Kenya a Masai dances in the wild. By User:Zuraj studio --Touzrimounir 10:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Left side overexposed. Can be easily fixed by application of a gradient brightness filter. And don't forget the personality tag. --Cccefalon 11:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Decline No response after 8 days --Hubertl 14:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:Mastle_y_Pic_dinviern_Gherdëina.jpg edit
- Nomination The mount Pic and Mastlé in Val Gardena - up front the Bosch dala Crëusc woodland. --Moroder 19:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Insufficient quality: IMHO the image background is too light (too little contrast). --F. Riedelio 10:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support IMHO the setting is presented authentically. --Milseburg 12:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks. Yes, that was exactly the ambiance --Moroder 18:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose for quality reasons: strong pixelation at the brightened shady trees. --Carschten 22:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Support. Maybe not the best weather and lighting for a colourful postcard idyll, but I can not see severe flaws in 100% view. With extreme pixelpeeping some small amount of noise can be seen in dark areas and not every pixel is crisp. But, hey, this is an image with 36 MPixels! As A.Savin often says: No double standards, please. -- Smial 11:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support as Smial. --Hubertl 14:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 20:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Metro_MSK_Line2_Dinamo_Central_Hall.jpg edit
- Nomination Dinamo Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 09:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Lights too overexposed; some CA visible --Daniel Case 06:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Well, I think it is not as awful as you described. I beg your sanction to ask the society. --Florstein 09:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Not perfect but sufficient for QI. Btw, photographing with tripod is not allowed in Moscow Metro. --A.Savin 14:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't know what exactly you were doing wrong, but this image is noisy and not sharp, especially at the sides. Sorry, but this location is easily accessible and easy to capture with a modern camera. --Shansov.net 12:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Shansov.net: О, мой грандиозный критик! Я понимаю, что рецензировать работы - дело сложное - гораздо легче приехать/прилететь в Москву и снять свои замечательные фотографии метрополитена, станции которого освещены лишь ненамного лучше, чем подвалы многоэтажек и в котором запрещено фотографировать со штатива. А то я вот порою встречал людей, которые тоже любили покритиковать, но когда у них слова доходили до дела - на выходе получался столь оглушительный пшик, что за них делалось очень неловко. ;) --Florstein 17:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Florstein: "Сперва добейся", да? :) Вовсе не надо самому быть поваром, чтобы оценивать вкус еды. Я даже нигде не говорил, что снял бы лучше. Мало того, здесь даже не мне решать, будет ли это QI или не будет, я просто высказал своё мнение. По моему мнению это хорошие фотографии и по композиции и по цвету, хорошо выбрано время без посетителей, просто по моей оценке технического качества это не QI, либо было бы QI при понижении разрешения. VI - уж точно. Приезжать и прилетать в Москву не обязательно, в ней и так много пользователей Вики. И про освещение вы преувеличили сильно. Освещение этих станций - 6-7 EV, как минимум на 4 ступени выше, чем освещение подвала, а то и больше - штатив не требуется. --Shansov.net 07:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Shansov.net: да ну, при чём тут "сперва добейся". Было бы чего добиваться. Если говорить серьёзно, то вот я, например, когда складываю своё суждение о чужих работах, пытаюсь выбирать нужный "шаблон" для каждого случая. Если, например, снимаешь на солнечной улице хорошей камерой (часто фулфреймом) мутную хрень с неизвестно какими цветами, выкладываешь её "как снято" и при этом пытаешься выдать фото за шедевр, то ты криворук и не в состоянии трезво оценить свою работу. Это один шаблон оценки. А когда пытаешься выжать что-то из хилой оптики, выкручивая диафрагму на максимум, завышая исо для нормальной съёмки в полумраке залов, явно возясь в фотошопе с конечным результатом - это, как ни крути, другой шаблон оценки. Говорю как о своих работах, так и о чужих. Шум и сильно не кристальная чёткость на полном просмотре тут не являются решающими критериями. И чтобы вы ни думали об освещённости станций Московского метро, его сильно не достаёт: некоторые станции действительно освещены, как двемерские пещеры. По-хорошему, чтобы получить отличный результат, нужно выставлять f7-8 и ИСО не более 200, а тут уж без треноги никак. Я не оправдываюсь, просто пытаюсь донести своё видение проблемы, и отчего я, по вашему мнению, пытаюсь продвинуть в КИ заведомую ерунду. --Florstein 12:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ещё можно купить какую-нибудь Sony A7S II, там с шумоподавлением всё путём при ИСО 800~1200, вот только разрешение её матрицы составляет ни много ни мало - 12 (двенадцать) мегапикселей, при цене в 230 000 (двести тридцать тысяч) рублей, вау :) --A.Savin 13:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Я как раз и удивился, что у вас получился такой уровень шумов и низкая чёткость при использовании практически последних достижений аппаратостроения - камерам, вроде, меньше года. А тут - исо 250 и 500. Как-то привык, что на 800 уже давно можно снимать вообще без шума, но видимо в мире кропов это ещё не так :( Уже вижу, что моё мнение не совпало с мнением большинства и новые ваши номинации не отклоняю. Да, понятно, что надо подходить с разными критериями при разных условиях, но надо ещё и учитывать суть номинации на QI. Если снято что-то полезное - то это VI, если что-то впечатляющее или красивое - то это FP, а QI - это именно технически качественное. По поводу темноты на станциях метро, тем не менее, не соглашусь. Не воспринимайте это как личный наезд. --Shansov.net 14:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Shansov.net: не понимаю смысла в проекте VI, его с успехом можно полностью заменить FP, но в рад, что в целом мы друг друга поняли. Будем расти над собой. :) Что касается камеры, то её вины тут нет, насколько я могу доверять своему небогатому опыту: всё упирается в мыльный объектив и мои кривые ручки, конечно же. --Florstein 17:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Florstein: "Сперва добейся", да? :) Вовсе не надо самому быть поваром, чтобы оценивать вкус еды. Я даже нигде не говорил, что снял бы лучше. Мало того, здесь даже не мне решать, будет ли это QI или не будет, я просто высказал своё мнение. По моему мнению это хорошие фотографии и по композиции и по цвету, хорошо выбрано время без посетителей, просто по моей оценке технического качества это не QI, либо было бы QI при понижении разрешения. VI - уж точно. Приезжать и прилетать в Москву не обязательно, в ней и так много пользователей Вики. И про освещение вы преувеличили сильно. Освещение этих станций - 6-7 EV, как минимум на 4 ступени выше, чем освещение подвала, а то и больше - штатив не требуется. --Shansov.net 07:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Shansov.net: О, мой грандиозный критик! Я понимаю, что рецензировать работы - дело сложное - гораздо легче приехать/прилететь в Москву и снять свои замечательные фотографии метрополитена, станции которого освещены лишь ненамного лучше, чем подвалы многоэтажек и в котором запрещено фотографировать со штатива. А то я вот порою встречал людей, которые тоже любили покритиковать, но когда у них слова доходили до дела - на выходе получался столь оглушительный пшик, что за них делалось очень неловко. ;) --Florstein 17:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 14:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 20:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)