Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 28 2014

• 
  • Nomination Hydraulic ram, Owingen-Hohenbodman, district Bodenseekreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --DKrieger 20:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Distribution substation between Aarhus and Odder --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monumental Clock, Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me. -Barras 20:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main square, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Our Lady of the Ascension, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Acosta Mine, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of Veracruz, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --P e z i 00:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Archaeological area of Cantona, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Qi for me. -Barras 20:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue Paradis, Liegé, Belgium --Ralf Roletschek 18:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality image. --DAJF 00:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chimneys of Casa Batlló --Jbribeiro1 18:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifix - Casa Batlló --Jbribeiro1 18:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Too tight crop, sorry --Poco a poco 19:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of St. Laurence, Seale viewed from the north-east. --Lewis Hulbert 18:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 18:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hmong house in Cacao, French Guiana. --Cayambe 17:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oyster-farming building and boat, port of La Cayenne, Marennes, Charente-Maritime, France. --JLPC 17:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 18:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oyster bags and "tables", La Tremblade, Charente-Maritime, France. --JLPC 17:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 18:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ÖBB-Railjet near Guntramsdorf --Linie29 16:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Nice picture! --P e z i 18:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grafenrheinfeld nuclear power plant, Lower Franconia (picture by User:Avda) -- Felix Koenig 16:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Visitor center National Park De Alde Feanen. Hotel insects in the butterfly garden.--
    Famberhorst 16:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --P e z i 17:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Sabha Mandap at the Sun Temple, Modhera, India --Bgag 15:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality for me. -Barras 15:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bats at the Sun Temple, Modhera, India --Bgag 15:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting --Poco a poco 19:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landsort lighthouse at Öja Island, Stockholm Archipelago. --ArildV 14:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --DXR 15:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Golden Retriever lying on gras with a stick under his hands. --Barras 14:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. A good quality image. --DAJF 14:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone labyrinth at Öja Island, Stockholm Archipelago. --ArildV 13:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kolerakyrkogården (the plague cemetery) at Öja island, Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 13:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --P e z i 15:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The city hall of the 15th Arrondissement of Paris, seen at night --DXR 13:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An illuminated subway sign of the Tokyo Metro, indicating entry 5 of Asakusa Station --DXR 13:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residence Würzburg as seen from the elevated eastern part of Hofgarten --DXR 13:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The new Weinholdbau at the campus of the university of technology in Chemnitz and the IfW building on the left. --Barras 13:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The new Weinholdbau at the campus of the university of technology in Chemnitz. --Barras 13:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok.--ArildV 13:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The big grey Dalmatian Pelican stretched his wings before --Zhanett.b 13:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good but small. Please add the english description to the file page.--ArildV 13:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Thank you for the clarification. I made a more detailed description on page file--Zhanett.b19:49,25 February 2014(UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La Mazda 6 présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile 2012 à Paris. --Thesupermat 13:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality image. --DAJF 14:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - spring Vorwärts Quelle (pramen Pokroku) --Pudelek 12:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boat "Chapeliño", 3ªVILL-4-1-12. O Grove. Galicia (Spain) --Lmbuga 12:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 13:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boat for tourists. O Grove. Galicia-GR3 --Lmbuga 12:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fishing boats. O Grove. Galicia-GR4 --Lmbuga 12:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --DXR 15:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture by Harutyun Yermaikan (Armenia). O Grove, Galicia-GR5 --Lmbuga 12:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Mubarak Al Rumaihi et Naomi 241 --Pleclown 12:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Piz Ciavazes and Saslonch on the left Sella Group --Moroder 12:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 13:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 12:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Playground in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 10:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mittagstal (Ladin: Val de Mesdì) on the Sella in the Dolomites, South Tyrol. Start on the top --Moroder 10:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 13:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Column of the holy trinity with parish church at left, Aspang-Markt, Lower Austria --P e z i 10:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Tobu 60000 series EMU train in Japan (by Omcrayon) --DAJF 08:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good composition, sharpness just ok.--ArildV 13:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ryde Pier. Mattbuck 08:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Redcar East railway station. Mattbuck 08:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --P e z i 23:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heron Quays DLR station, seen from Canary Wharf. Mattbuck 08:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --P e z i 08:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sorrento, Marina Piccolo --Berthold Werner 07:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --P e z i 08:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Mammillate Ancilla, Amalda mamillata --Llez 05:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pelican does not dive,when hunting fish, and plunges into the water only the head, the neck and the front part of the body.. --Zhanett.b 05:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
     Comment Needs the Taxa naming, and an English language description on the image would be nice. --DAJF 05:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline No such image, and nor was there ever apparently... Mattbuck 08:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
     Comment I have restored the original file name nominated, which the uploader arbitrarily changed, apparently misunderstanding my suggestion to include an English language description (not file name). --DAJF 08:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
    English language description added with a link to en.wp--Lmbuga 12:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
    Sorry. Problem: en:Dalmatian pellicanus is Pelecanus crispus. The image is categorized as Pelecanus occidentalis or en:Brown Pelican--Lmbuga 12:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
    I changed my mind: "Decline"--Lmbuga 13:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Thank you for the clarification. I changed the category page file.--Zhanett.b19:49,25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination In the breeding colonies can hear low deaf growling sounds Dalmatian Pelican. The rest of the time he is silent. --Zhanett.b 05:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
     Comment Needs the Taxa naming, and an English language description on the image would be nice. --DAJF 05:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline No such image, and nor was there ever apparently... Mattbuck 08:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
     Comment I have restored the original file name nominated, which the uploader arbitrarily changed, apparently misunderstanding my suggestion to include an English language description (not file name). --DAJF 08:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
    Problem: en:Dalmatian pellicanus is Pelecanus crispus. The image is categorized as Pelecanus occidentalis or en:Brown Pelican--Lmbuga 12:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Thank you for the clarification. I changed the category page file--Zhanett.b19:50,25 February 2014(UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Star "Harrison Ford" at the Hollywood Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, USA --XRay 04:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion It would have been nice if the name was more clearly visible, but the picture as a whole is of good quality. --DAJF 05:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady of Kazan Church. Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 00:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady of Kazan Church. Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 00:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady of Kazan Church. Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 00:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument memorizing the engagement of empress Maria Theresia, Akademiepark Wiener Neustadt, Lower Austria --P e z i 22:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hellamaa bay in Hiiumaa (by Hiiumaamudeliklubi) Kruusamägi 15:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Comment Geocoding would be highly appreciated. --P e z i 18:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Kruusamägi 23:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --P e z i 08:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hanikatsi island near Hiiumaa (by Hiiumaamudeliklubi) Kruusamägi 15:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 12:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A high resolution picture of the rear end of a Proton Suprima S. --Aero777 15:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Too tight crop --Poco a poco 19:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
    Crop and quality is imho OK, I would like to discuss it. --Tuxyso 06:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
    No need to discuss, this version is better Poco a poco 21:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sanxenxo, his beach and his port. Galicia (Spain) --Lmbuga 14:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 10:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orientation map at the entrance of Akademiepark, Wr. Neustadt, Lower Austria --P e z i 20:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 10:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Fendt Dieselross F18 tractor during a tractor parade in Bavaria, Germany. --High Contrast 20:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC) Comment tiny tilt CW --P e z i 21:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
     Done Slightly rotated. Better now? --High Contrast 20:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not perfect but QI now IMO. --P e z i 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Deutz tractor during a tractor parade in Bavaria, Germany. --High Contrast 20:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC) Comment Needs tiny tilt/perspective correction. --P e z i 21:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
     Done Slightly rotated. Better now? --High Contrast 20:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not perfect, but QI now IMO --P e z i 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Okhlopkhov's Irkutsk Drama Theatre. Irkutsk, Russia. --Halavar 16:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, sky is overexposed --Jacek Halicki 14:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cyclamen coum, white seedling.--
    Famberhorst 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
    ** Again I propose to change the crop --Uoaei1 20:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
     Done Correction.
    Famberhorst 06:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Maybe still not optimal, but ok to me. --Uoaei1 19:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Silbersee III, sand transport on the trail, Haltern am See, Germany --XRay 04:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
    I'm not sure about this. I was all set to decline due to overexposure, but you know I actually like this. Mattbuck 18:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion I think it’s good enough. Do these pipes actually transport sand? --Kreuzschnabel 16:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
     Fixed It's a little bit darker now, so IMO it's not overexposed. And the pipes actually transport sand with water from another sea (Silbersee II) nearby.--XRay 17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Duffield railway station. Mattbuck 19:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok but need a little sharpening and to bright a bit the shadows please --Christian Ferrer 18:43, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
     Done Mattbuck 23:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Support ok Christian Ferrer 12:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clevedon. Mattbuck 20:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  CommentGood but maybe to dark?--ArildV 08:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
     Done Mattbuck 18:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks.--ArildV 13:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Primary School Cinta Mata, Sabah --Cccefalon 16:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not sure this is crisp enough. Mattbuck 23:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
    I think it is. --Kreuzschnabel 16:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tokyo Sky Tree. --JordyMeow 10:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    Seems blueish cast. Mattbuck 23:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline nice image but not sharp enough --Taxiarchos228 21:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crete: public telephone --Taxiarchos228 20:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    Needs perspective correction (verticals are leaning out). I'm not sure about the composition, for now it's looks messy. Perhaps you can avoid some of the restive structures by applying another crop. I made annotations. --Cccefalon 11:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
    sorry, but here is no perpective correction needed, the telephone is not straight, I see no problem with the crop, this is for sure not a FP --Taxiarchos228 08:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion no correction needed. Good quality --Ralf Roletschek 10:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 03.jpg

• Nomination Saint Anne church in Zieleniec --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support There is a small blemish in the sky to the right of the church spire. I'm guessing it is a bird in the distance rather than a dust spot, but might it be better just to clone it out anyway? Apart from that, this is clearly a good quality image. --DAJF 02:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree, unnatural colours. --Uoaei1 19:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
   Support Colours are OK, QI for me --Halavar 23:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 05:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI to me--DKrieger 16:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 23:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Dortmund_Germany_Zeche-Zollern-03.jpg

• Nomination Colliery lorry at "Zeche Zollern" in Dortmund, Germany --Cccefalon 19:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
   Support QI imo. --ArildV 09:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose The bottom is unsharp, and sky overexposed. --Mattbuck 18:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Chromatic aberration (prominent green fringing) where the edges of the wagons interact with the sky behind. --DAJF 00:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 23:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:13-12-26-luettich-RalfR-136.jpg

• Nomination Mailboxes in Liège, Belgium --Ralf Roletschek 23:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline Good photographic quality. Please apply the perspective correction, the left side is leaning; as well as cropping out the tiny part of the street sign --Cccefalon 06:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC) verzerrt. --Ralf Roletschek 11:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose - Unsharp for me, and bad perspective. Mattbuck 18:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC) good perspective  I withdraw my nomination--Ralf Roletschek 10:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:59, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Training horse jumping.jpg

• Nomination Horse jumping obstacles. Training, Bulgaria, 2014. --Biso 08:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Sorry, good picture, but too tight at top and at bottom, not QI IMO: Let's discuss--Lmbuga 10:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose the crop is waaay too tight. Pleclown 12:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Madama_de_Silgar_por_Alfonso_Vilar_Lamelas._Sanxenxo._Galiza_SX-4.jpg

• Nomination Sculpture Madama de Silgar by Alfonso Vilar Lamelas with sunbathers swimmers of the beach of Silgar. Sanxenxo. Galicia SX-4 --Lmbuga 23:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree, the main subject is too small and not clearly visible --Uoaei1 20:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  More data added--Lmbuga 23:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Swimming people somewhat disturbing, but ok. --Smial 15:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Basically a good quality image. (Small point regarding the English description: The people in the sea are "bathers" or "swimmers" rather than "sunbathers".) --DAJF 01:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks. The English descricion on the picture and the proposal has been changed--Lmbuga 20:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Durasov_Palace.jpg

• Nomination Nikolay Durasov’s Palace in Lyublino, Moscow, Russia --Nino Verde 11:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Request Good, but it needs a little perspective correction--Lmbuga 19:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but it was already corrected and vertical lines are straight. --Nino Verde 08:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality image. --DAJF 07:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
• {{o}} Good picture, but improvable: Perspective distortion (see notes). Vertical lines of the notes are not stright--Lmbuga 20:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 Comment It's a shame because the image is nice and good--Lmbuga 20:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

I see now. It's really have some distortion. --Nino Verde 05:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done Ok, is it good now? --Nino Verde 05:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe 10:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:West Ruislip station MMB 22 1992-Stock.jpg

• Nomination Central Line train at West Ruislip. Mattbuck 19:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Excessive shadow. --DAJF 03:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  I don't think that's an issue, though I can certainly take another look at this one. --Mattbuck 20:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The overall shadow does not appear to have been improved. --DAJF 07:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

  I didn't say I had done yet. Mattbuck 08:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Weak support Quality is good. Composition may be better, but is good enough from my point of view. --Nino Verde 11:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 18:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support not nice but QI. ;) --Ralf Roletschek 19:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Barmouth railway station MMB 01.jpg

• Nomination Barmouth railway station. Mattbuck 07:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Below 2 MB size. --DAJF 03:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  The limit is megaPIXELS, not megabytes. Mattbuck 20:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Oops, my mistake. Reasonable quality. --DAJF 06:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Paddington station MMB 94 332013 43034.jpg

• Nomination Paddington station. Mattbuck 07:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose - The train in the middle is in shadow, and the train on the right is distracting. --DAJF 02:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

  I ask for a second opinion. Mattbuck 20:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

  The excessive shadow does not appear to have been fixed, and the composition/cropping of the image is poor with the train on the right chopped off. --DAJF 06:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

• I will support if you bright just a bit the shadows --Christian Ferrer 18:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

   Done, though it looked about right to me. Mattbuck 22:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support ok in my eyes. --Ralf Roletschek 19:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB H5 Mini 7s and Miglia Championship.jpg

• Nomination Mini racing at Castle Combe. Mattbuck 20:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline Thank goodness the photographer's white cane is not in the foreground! I could detract the attention from the billboard.--? 14:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Invalid vote. Resetting to nomination --DXR 17:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Not clear what the photographer was trying to focus on. Poor quality. --DAJF 02:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

  I think the intent is pretty clear - in focus scaffolding thingy, cars behind out of focus. Mattbuck 20:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

  The focus is on the ladder, which obscures the sign behind, which in turn obscures the out-of-focus cars behind. Not a QI. --DAJF 06:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Gloucester railway station MMB 41 150245 170639.jpg

• Nomination DMUs at Gloucester. Mattbuck 08:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  Need a little sharpening and to bright a little the shadows IMO Christian Ferrer 08:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
• Too much shadow in the foreground. --DAJF 14:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

  Brightened. --Mattbuck 20:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

   Oppose Still feel that the subject (the train on the right) merges into the shadows too much. Not a QI. --DAJF 06:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support acceptable IMO Christian Ferrer 18:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but image is blurry and unsharp. --Nino Verde 07:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

  It's perhaps not the sharpest photo, but blurry is a bit of a stretch. Mattbuck 21:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

  I disagree. Stretch will make some parts of image blurry, but here i can't find sharp parts. Numbers on trais is blurred, building in front is blurred, text on the sign blurred too. Looks like focus miss or motion blur. --Nino Verde 16:56, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

  By stretch I meant that saying that is an exagerration. I will sharpen it... Mattbuck 17:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Turnhout, Sint Pieterskerk foto15 2010-10-03 13.10.JPG

• Nomination Turnhout, church (Belgium) --Michielverbeek 21:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Image needs perspective correction. --Halavar 23:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
   Done Is this better?--Michielverbeek 22:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  No, it's still leaning in quite significantly. The verticals in real life need to be vertical in the photo. Mattbuck 22:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Looks fine to me. No need to introduce artificial perspective correction. Good quality image. --DAJF 04:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose No, sorry. Architectural works have to be corrected, and here it should well be possible --DXR 09:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support but only if the verticals are not parallel. --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The value of rectilinear verticals is not negotiable. There are situations where non-rectilinear verticals cannot be avoided, but thats not the case here. --Cccefalon 18:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, but as Cccefalon--Lmbuga 21:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Cccefalon and Lmbuga. --Cayambe (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB C4 43177.jpg

• Nomination 43177 at Nailsea & Backwell. Mattbuck 19:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The front of the train does not appear sufficiently sharp (CA). --DAJF 03:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 06:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Nino Verde 07:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB «N8 Canary Wharf.jpg

• Nomination Canary Wharf. Mattbuck 07:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality. --Smial 13:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor composition. The buildings in the foreground are distracting clutter. --DAJF 02:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Sky a bit noisy but acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 06:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:South Quay DLR station MMB 10.jpg

• Nomination South Quay DLR station. Mattbuck 20:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support - Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  OpposeTrain itself is out of focus and barely visible. Poor composition. --DAJF 02:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

  The composition was intentional. I wanted to show the building behind it. Mattbuck 19:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Technically ok. I like the composition because of the nice colour contrast and the diagonals. -- Smial 16:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Parroquia_de_Nuestra_Señora_de_la_Asunción,_Real_del_Monte,_Hidalgo,_México,_2013-10-10,_DD_08.JPG

• Nomination: Church of Our Lady of the Ascension, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review Nicely composed and sharp too, but also too dark. Did you use polarising filter? Imo you should brighten darker areas, maybe everything but the clouds. --Kadellar 20:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
   Hecho :) Poco a poco 13:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  Thank you for reworking, it is better but I'm not sure... Any other opinions, please? --Kadellar 15:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  Not QI for me - leaning out on the right, unsharp at the bottom and rather dark. Mattbuck 22:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  to me its QI -->  Support --Ralf Roletschek 11:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Blackhorse Road station MMB 06 66429.jpg

• Nomination: 66429 passes through Blackhorse Road. Mattbuck 15:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review Can you bright a little bit the shadows please?--Christian Ferrer 15:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
   Done Mattbuck 21:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The main subject of the photo (the locomotive) is in shadow and does not appear to be in focus. --DAJF 02:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

  It's quite clearly in focus. Mattbuck 19:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Chór Echo, Łaziska Górne - 2013.11.JPG

• Nomination: Choir Echo from Łaziska Górne (Ober Lazisk), Silesia --Pudelek 18:11, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review I reverse to nomination. Please ad an English description, I can not evaluate a Polish descriptio--Moroder 22:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  
•  Support Just use google translate. Mattbuck 21:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp. --DAJF 02:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Tip_Top_House_-_05.JPG

• Nomination: Tip Top House, on top of Mount Washington --Basvb 23:16, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review Could you please add a bit to the description. What is a tip-top house? Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done, it's a name. Basvb 16:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  I was hoping for a bit more, but ok. Mattbuck 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  I disagree better description is required --Moroder 09:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nous devons maintenir une bonne description assez pour avoir une idée de ce que c'est que ça. --The Photographer 19:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good quality to me. --DAJF 03:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Palacio_Wilhelmshöhe,_Kassel,_Alemania,_2013-10-19,_DD_01.JPG

• Nomination: Wilhelmshöhe Palace, Kassel, Germany --Poco a poco 19:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review This one is ok, but is all that black space necessary? I think it's too much. --Kadellar 02:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
   Cropped Poco a poco 20:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  I find the unsharpness on the left to be disturbing. Mattbuck 00:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  I think this one deserves a CR. Btw, I like the new crop, thanks. --Kadellar 19:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Chedul_y_Gherdeina_da_Mont_de_Seura.jpg

• Nomination View of the "Chedul valley" from Mont de Sëura in Val Gardena --Moroder 21:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Kadellar 00:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose CR needed to clarify if I am the only one who cannot see this file neither in thumbnail, nor in preview, nor at 100% --A.Savin 16:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Info You are right, I myself can't see it, but since it was reviewed I thought I am the only one. I will upload it again --Moroder 18:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  CommentI couldn't see the thumb but I could see it in full resolution. I controlled the review of Kadellar but found nothing to complain, so I was ok with his  Support --Cccefalon 20:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  resized I tried several new uploads and finally resized by 15% but it didn't help --Moroder 20:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
• I couldn't see thumbnail view either. Is that a must to be QI? I didn't know. I did could see the image's page and full res versions. --Kadellar 14:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

  I don't think so there must be a wikibug around. --Moroder 20:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 22:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Vegetable market, Ahmedabad.jpg

• Nomination: Vegetable market, Ahmedabad, India --Bgag 15:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review
•  Oppose unsharp --A.Savin 16:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)  Neutral Better. --A.Savin 20:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I would like to have another advice. --Bgag 18:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support acceptable --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I have imported a new version of the picture. --Bgag 19:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor choice of composition with the man's head chopped off. --DAJF 03:16, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Hortenabriss_ffo_06.jpg

• Nomination: Demolition of the Horten General Store in the borough Zentrum in Frankfurt (Oder), Brandenburg, Germany. By User:Willi Wallroth --Sebastian Wallroth 10:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review According to QIC rules, mass nomination is considered as flooding. --Cccefalon 11:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support in my eyes QI. --Ralf Roletschek 14:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The perspective needs correcting. --DAJF 03:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Hortenabriss_ffo_07.jpg

• Nomination: Demolition of the Horten General Store in the borough Zenrum in Frankfurt (Oder), Brandenburg, Germany. By User:Willi Wallroth --Sebastian Wallroth 10:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review According to QIC rules, mass nomination is considered as flooding. --Cccefalon 11:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support in my eyes QI. --Ralf Roletschek 14:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The perspective needs correcting, and the sign in the foreground is distracting. --DAJF 03:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

file:Helenium bigelovii Bigelow sneezeweed.jpg

• Nomination: Closeup of Helenium bigelovii (Bigelow's sneezeweed) flowerhead. By Dcrjsr. --ArionEstar 00:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review OK --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
   OpposeNot convinced this is quite sharp. --Mattbuck 22:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
   Support Not perfect, but still QI for me--Uoaei1 20:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Wellington_Statue,_Aldershot.JPG

• Nomination: Wellington Statue, Aldershot --Lewis Hulbert 17:57, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  Several issues: unfortunate light; crop too tight; perspective distortion. --NorbertNagel 20:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  All that should be  Done. Lewis Hulbert 21:11, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
• Review Good quality. --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  Needs sharpening IMO. --Mattbuck 22:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 22:35, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Laxenburg Schlosspark Kaiser Franz I 2009 a.jpg

• Nomination Bust of Emperor Franz I. of Austria in Laxenburg, Lower Austria. --Tsui 13:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Support --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
   Weak oppose - the statue is nice and sharp, but the grass and base seem distorted. --Mattbuck 22:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 weak oppose I don't know, what happened. With f/6.3 the whole statue should be sharp, but it isn't. Only the center is sharp.--XRay 09:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_San_Cristóbal,_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-11,_DD_07.JPG

• Nomination St Cristopher church, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose overexposed (blown higlight in the bottom) --Christian Ferrer 05:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
• OK overexposion on the bottom harmonizes with other parts of the image --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC) --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral I am not sure if this image is QI, I am sorry, IMHO, Could be nice a HDR for fix Windows overexpositions problems --The Photographer 02:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The top part appears noisy, while the bottom part is overexposed. Sorry. --DAJF 17:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)