Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 01 2018

Consensual review edit

File:Cloud_Guitar_001_-_Schecter_Prince_White_Cloud.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The guitar from prince over the sky. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 18:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Poor categories and overprocessed --A.Savin 20:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I disagree Mr. Savin. CAT any ideas? But what you call overprocessed is a technique, called Quattro-Process. fyi -This was already a QI --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The sky is posterized, I'm not sure what to think about the bottom. As for categories, I think the standard here at QIC is to get something about the type of cloud, but I don't know which ones would be appropriate here.--Peulle 14:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment -Posterization is the feature of this process. Like Dodge&Burn at the bottom. Will you express a Solarisation (example for another technique) can´t never be a QI? Otherwise the critic, not a discuss about it, have the sense like "I miss colours" from a b&w-image;-) It was already a QI declined by myself, bcs. Quadro is not the easiest process and generate some digital bugs. Schecter is a really rare Guitar, used by Prince (for example Prince - Raspberry Beret or "When Doves Cry") Prince was a very small men and the guitars often made individual only for him. I called the cloud Schecter, but I can imagine you will never find a cloud like that. So CAT with only one pic not makes sense--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
    •   Comment Hans-Jürgen Neubert, your link to the youtube video was breaking the template so I removed it. I hope that's okay. PumpkinSky talk 15:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
      •   CommentLooks like it´s not possible to implate the url. But someone kills your Pumkin-Field, what a pity ;-) Hans-Jürgen
  •   Info There have been discussions about whether images with artistic merit can be promoted here, but I can't find them right now. Sometimes, though, special compositions and such give results that are seen as special enough for awards, but they usually don't involve editing processes. See this page for overview. :) --Peulle 14:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 14:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

File:20170621_Admira_Wacker_vs_Vardar_Skopje_DSC_6236.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Friendly match Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FK Vardar Skopje, 2017-06-21. Picture shows: Boban Grncarov (6), Manuel Maranda (15), Andreas Leitner (1),Yevhen Novak (21) --Granada 10:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. --XRay 10:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I set this to CR myself! I want to know what is a good sports photo and why. --Granada 12:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  • IMO this sports photo is a good one, because it's a good composition and sharp enough for these kind of photographs. It was the right moment to take the photo. --XRay 08:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support this is not in the photo studio --Ralf Roletschek 08:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support This photo does not have the same problem as the others. This one has a clear rendering of people's facial features, as a proper "frozen moment in time". The other photos have the problem of washed out features and loss of detail as a consequence.--Peulle 13:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
      Comment That's because this was shot in daylight and the older D4 has 30MP less pixels than the D850 just hiding the "problems" you mentioned. But most soccer games, especially those broadcasted on TV, take place in the evening and with higher ISOs which exposes more noise and less detail. But this can't be the reason to blame the images for not being featured at all and I object to the argument that the other images were washed out and had no detail at all. I showed these images to people understanding what sports photography is about and they all said those images were great, especially the one currently being rejected in FPC as a perfect sports moment capture with great detail and exposing the right amount of visible movement within the frozen moment to instantly know what's going on. Apart from that the above image is a quite bad one. Technically it might be o.k., but it's shot from the behind - not so good. --Granada 14:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - This photo is exciting. I don't think these shots have to be from the front always. Shot this way, the viewer is like a member of the scoring team who's just behind the play. -- Ikan Kekek 17:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 14:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)