Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 15 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Singapore_(SG),_China_Town,_Pagoda_Street_--_2019_--_4504.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Pagoda Street, Chinatown, Singapore --XRay 05:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overexposed sky. The upper left area is blurred. --A.Savin 08:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I have to agree with A.Savin on this. -- Ikan Kekek 11:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Done Thank you for your reviews. Sky and sharpness are improved now and IMO good enough. Sorry, IMO the sky is very bright, but not unnatural. (Yes, the brightness is near 100 percent.) --XRay 12:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Thanks. It's better. However, some of the streamers are still invisible because of the exposure of the sky. I'll let this go to a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 23:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 12:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Биолог.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 4th-year student of the Faculty of Natural Sciences examines a lab mouse. By User:Vladislav Nekrasov --Tomer T 15:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Mouse not really sharp, pretty noisy overall, unfortunate top crop --Poco a poco 18:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. Good crop, mouse is fine --Andrew J.Kurbiko 23:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for now - I'd allow the crop, but I agree with Poco on the rest. However, I'd like to support. I'm not sure it's possible to make the mouse's head sharp enough, but the photo could be de-noised. -- Ikan Kekek 08:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The poor mouse is not sharp enough. -- Spurzem 10:50, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Question How can he examine the mouse by looking into the camera? --Palauenc05 11:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

File:DSC00865-Пано_копия_копия.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Portal of Saint Petersburg Mosque, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Anastasia Mazureva --Tomer T 20:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 09:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Disagree, heavily overprocessed. --A.Savin 11:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose +1 --Peulle 09:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Are you guys seeing oversharpening? I see issues mainly at full size, and it looks excellent at 50%. Ikan Kekek 10:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good for me: good sharpness, good colors, good perspective. Where is the problem? -- Spurzem 11:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yes, the photo appears oversharpened and still has relatively blurred image corners. The wide open aperture was probably not a good choice. -- Smial 14:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose unfortunately overprocessed. A less agressive approach would have probably yielded a better result. --MB-one 11:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose It's a pitty, as this is a nice subject -- but to me it definitely looks oversharpened. --Domob 18:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 09:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)