Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 20 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Wilsons_Promontory_National_Park_(AU),_Squeaky_Beach_--_2019_--_172208.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Squeaky Beach in Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Disagree, overexposed sky. --A.Savin 10:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Done Just improved (a little bit). --XRay 05:55, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. Sometimes, the sky looks like that. -- Ikan Kekek 06:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  • You're so right. Sun behind the clouds, sky very bright. --XRay 09:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Wiesenpieper_auf_dem_Ostergroen_Spiekeroog_-_Nationalpark_niedersächsisches_Wattenmeer.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2019. --Ssprmannheim 10:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. -- 15:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose head is not very sharp and bird is small in image --Charlesjsharp 21:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Focus appears to be perfectly on the eyes, the image has more than 6 Mpixels, that is by far good enough for a wildlife shot. Of course it could be cropped to 2 MPixels, so the Bird appears bigger in the frame, but why? Good composition as is. --Smial 12:47, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Une_brebis_et_ses_agneaux_au_repos.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination A sheep and its lambs at rest --Adoscam 07:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion This is a Quality Image to me, except that to my understanding, it's expected for you to provide geographic coordinates (latitude/longitude). If you could at least provide something approximate, I think we can promote this image. -- Ikan Kekek 09:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
      Support - Done. Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 18:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose not clear enough --Charlesjsharp 10:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Ermell 17:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:20191208 Semnopithecus entellus, Udaipur 1237 7571 DxO.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Southern plains gray langur (Semnopithecus dussumieri) at the Monsoon Palace in Udaipur --Jakubhal 21:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose poor choice of background and animal too dark --Charlesjsharp 10:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Animal is too dark --Michielverbeek 22:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 13:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Tomate_mur_sur_un_support_blanc.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ripe tomato on a white support --Adoscam 11:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. -- 12:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too grainy, maybe by postprocessing the darker part under the tomato. --PtrQs 00:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Only a small part of the image is sharp. As this is an unmoving object, I expect better DOF. Greetings --Dirtsc 08:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 13:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:The_Fishermen_using_the_wooden_Canoe_for_fishing_in_the_Chalakudy_River.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wooden canoes are commonly used by the local fishermen to navigate through thickly vegetated banks of Chalakudy River for fishingI, By User:Jan J George --Eatcha 03:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline   Support - This one looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Sorry but I think it's overprocessed. Please discuss --Podzemnik 06:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Yeah, it may be oversaturated. I feel that the canoe and men are sharp enough, although the man on the left may be too red. So for all these reasons, I've struck out my supporting vote, but I hope to reinstate it when these things are addressed. User:Jan J George, would you like to try some fixes? -- Ikan Kekek 06:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose And furthermore strong CAs around white skirt and on tree trunks in the background. The sky ist postprocessed with a heavy blue filter, so the withe clouds shine blue. --PtrQs 01:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very nice composition, but completely destroyed by overprocessing. Banding and other artifacts in the aartificially darkened sky, sensor noise amplified by way too strong colour saturation. Also JPG compression artifacts and CA. A pity, because the image isn't a bad shot. --Smial 09:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC) Ps: the vignetting is expressly no problem for me with photos of this kind.
  •   OpposeAs Smial. --Dirtsc 08:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 13:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Reichenspitzegruppe.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View on Reichenspitzegruppe from Grosser Geiger --Grtek 23:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose This too looks quite dark --Podzemnik 01:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Definitelly disagree that this is underexposed--Grtek 18:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok for me. Grtek, you can send it into CR your self by changing "nomnation" into "Discuss" if you disagree with any reviewer´s opinion. --Milseburg 07:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support - Good photo to me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The sky is too grainy. --MB-one 12:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support It's a difficult kind of shot. I would prefer a little more brightness, but overall it pictures the visual appearance quite well. Greetings --Dirtsc 08:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 13:16, 19 January 2020 (UTC)