Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 13 2024

Consensual review

edit

File:Tholpava_koothu_shadow_puppet_artist_(1).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Tholpava koothu shadow puppet artistsI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 17:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Focus is not on the face and it is blurred too much. --Augustgeyler 22:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Augustgeyler. --Plozessor 07:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --August Geyler (talk) 21:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

File:BMW_M3,_BAS_24,_Brussels_(P1170529-RR).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination BMW M3 at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 08:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose The right yellow car merged to the other one (the subject) ruins the composition. --Sebring12Hrs 14:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment I disagree. The separation between subject an background is learly visible IMO --MB-one 18:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unfortunately I disagree with your disagreeing, another yellow car in the background of a yellow car is disturbing. Might have been better to take the picture from a bit more right. --Plozessor 07:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose In addition to the problems already criticized by others, the wide-angle perspective also destroys the proportions of the vehicle. Maybe I'm too old-fashioned, but for me, wide-angle lenses are a tool for rather special designs, not a means of "making everything fit into the picture". (This also applies to architecture). --Smial 11:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --August Geyler (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Acacia_-_Dghoumes_National_Park.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination an Acacia tree in Dghoumes National ParkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Bill.pix 12:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A more precise location (or geocode) is needed here. Otherwise good. --Augustgeyler 19:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Weak (temporary)   Oppose. Nice view, but CA should be fixed, that would probably also improve the sharpness at the edges. Somewhat reddish tint. The vignetting could also be reduced a little (not necessarily completely) as I don't think it helps to improve the composition. --Smial 12:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --August Geyler (talk) 21:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

File:РАССВЕТ.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Sunrise in Ile-Alatau national park. Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. By User:RS128 --Красный 06:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment There is one dust spot next to the sun on the right --Poco a poco 07:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 23:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment Dust spot still there, be patient --Poco a poco 08:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  • If I move to CR after it was supported then it has to be an   Oppose, not a comment Poco a poco 17:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Info This should go to discussions I guess. --Plozessor 12:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Dust spots should be removed. Otherwise very good. --Augustgeyler 21:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment The dust spots can be removed later with a little effort --Georgfotoart 13:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Not done --Milseburg 16:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --August Geyler (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Li_L9,_Almaty_(P1180247).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Li Auto L9 in Almaty --MB-one 22:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Красный 04:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very unfortunate lighting. Please discuss whether it is a QI. -- Spurzem 09:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO acceptable. --Plozessor 15:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose An SUV in its natural habitat: blocking the road when parking. Otherwise, I agree with Spurzem. --Smial 13:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Plozessor--Alexander-93 17:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --August Geyler (talk) 21:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Μονή_Ζωοδόχου_Πηγής_στη_Στεμνίτσα_2998.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The monastery of Zoodochos Pigi in Stemnitsa, Arcadia. --C messier 22:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. The foreground is too dark, the facade of the building on the right is overexposed. Please discuss whether the photo is really a quality image. -- Spurzem 09:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Acceptable to me. --Sebring12Hrs 07:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Acceptable and realistic to me. No details lost in foreground or background.--ArildV (talk) 14:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Not a good or bad picture. It is OK. The light does not invite the viewer into the scene. It is sharp and clear with good resolution. The composition is good. The brightened shadows now tend to reveal some noise. The wide angle perspective in combination with strong perspective correction led to an unrealistic appearance of the floor on the left. Only the perspective artefacts leading me very slightly to oppose on this nomination. But it is a borderline decision. --Augustgeyler 17:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good quality.--Tournasol7 19:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support I also recognize the slight overexposure on the right, but I don't find it too disturbing in this case, especially since the colors still look realistic. --Smial 13:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Юрий Д.К. 18:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:A_reflection_flight_of_barn_swallow.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination a reflection flight of barn swallow captured in bagmati river in kathmandy valley. By User:Prasan Shrestha --Nirmal Dulal 09:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose It looks somehow   Overprocessed as if the naturally shadwed body of the bird was brightend annaturally. What do others think? --Augustgeyler 11:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Neutral waiting for some response. I am not sure about it anymore. --August Geyler (talk) 06:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Not sure about brightness, but it looks retouched (something seems off with the tips of both wings). Also it is not really sharp and detailed. What exactly do you mean with "reflection flight", does the picture not show the actual bird but rather its reflection in the water or something? --Plozessor 16:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment Perhaps I was wrong with my vote. The description says: "a reflection flight of barn swallow captured in bagmati river in kathmandy valley in nepal". If that is the case, the bright underside could be natural. It must have been a very clever setup to get the bird at this angle while having very even water below and perfect light from above. @Prasan Shrestha: @Nirmal Dulal: can you shed light on the background of this shooting? --Augustgeyler 18:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support You're not looking at the bird directly but a reflection in the water. It's a clever setup, and the image seems detailed enough considering the circumstances. ReneeWrites 22:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Plozessor 16:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)