Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 14 2016

Consensual review

edit

File:Krasny_Yar_Church_of_Christ_the_Saviour_P5101046_2200.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Krasny Yar. Church of Christ the Saviour --Alexxx1979 09:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment @Alexxx1979: Can you reduce the jpeg compression (less compression/bigger size)? It would probably result in a better sky and it is overall a good motif and photo. --Cccefalon 07:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Krishna Chaitanya Velaga 04:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Because no reaction and another user overrides my concerns. --Cccefalon 07:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective correction slightly overdone. -- Smial 09:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective not good enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 13:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 12:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Boletus luridus 2016 G1.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Picked Lurid boletes -- George Chernilevsky 18:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Harsh flash light. --C messier 08:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks OK to me; suitably sharp and not clearly overexposed. --Peulle 12:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Perfect for me --Livioandronico2013 19:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good. Using a flash is not forbidden, and the shadows are well managed here.--Jebulon 08:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 12:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

File:La Coruña View.JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination A Coruña, Galicia, Spain. --Marrovi 00:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Ok for me. --Hubertl 22:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The image may be better with less empty sky. The half person at the left and the half at the right is disturbing. Fixable with a crop. --XRay 17:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose sorry, but per XRay. --Alchemist-hp 05:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment @Marrovi: What are you waiting for? The ultimate or dooms day? --Hubertl 06:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per others. If not necessary, horizon in the middle is a no go.--Jebulon 08:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment I'm sorry, I don't understand, Humbertl, I thought Europe people was polite.--Marrovi 23:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment @Marrovi: It´s part of the consensual review process, that the nominators respond to, what the assessors suggest. You did for 11 days exactly nothing. YOU are asking for assessing your images, not the assessors! It is not at all my job here, to call attention! --Hubertl 02:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 12:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)