Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 15 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Pfarrkirche_Schöngrabern,_Figuren_an_der_Apsis-5973.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Romanesque figures (13th Century) at the outside of the apsis of the parish Church Schöngrabern, Lower Austria By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 03:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Oppose Sorry Hubertl, this one lacks sharpness, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 17:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment you are right, Poco a poco, but - as so often - I made some different versions. I think, this one is sharp enough. --Hubertl 18:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
    Indeed,   Support QI to me now Poco a poco 21:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 19:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Vladivostok_Zolotoy_Rog_Bay_P8050527_2200.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Vladivostok. Zolotoy Rog Bay --Alexxx1979 12:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Maybe too much contrast but QI overall --Poco a poco 16:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
    • Here we go again. The category "Vladivostok" is inappropriate, because, I'm sure this bridge has its own. User:Alexxx1979 seems to be ignoring all my requests to do appropriate categorization, maybe he should search for an other playground outside of Commons. There is no possibility to find a file on Commons without appropriate categories, and we do not use "tags à la Flickr"... --A.Savin 03:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak   Oppose There's something about the composition of this image that looks wrong to me. There's half a bridge, parts of two cranes, a bit too much water, etc. I'd suggest a crop of some description, but I'm not sure what the main subject is supposed to be - the bridge, the ships, something else? -- Bahnfrend 08:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support. Atmospheric good image. -- Spurzem 18:42, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 19:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)