Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 20 2022
-
- Nomination Cemetery with parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tomb of Boleslav II of Poland and northern side chapel of the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southwestern view of the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination War memorial with crucifix at the cemetery in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 02:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. But: There are at least two dust spots in the sky, top left. Please remove them. Thank you. --XRay 02:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dustspots were removed. —- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A cathedral in Mexico --Nheyob 19:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Bad bottom crop and only the center is sharp enough --Michielverbeek 20:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porsche 962 at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 19:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Malachite kingfisher (Corythornis cristatus) --Snowmanstudios 18:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis) --Snowmanstudios 18:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) --Snowmanstudios 18:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westhafen in Frankfurt, Germany -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 18:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurotower in Frankfurt, Germany -- Der Wolf im Wald 15:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 16:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Leonardo da Vinci (Uffizi Gallery) --Wikibusters 11:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Stor-Buøya towards Narvtinden and Hovdanvika, Flakstad, Norway --Ximonic 11:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Support FP for me! -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue Grotto, Marsaxlokk, Malta Island, Malta --Poco a poco 09:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 11:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus), Regga, Gozo, Malta --Poco a poco 09:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 18:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mediterranean moray (Muraena helena), Regga, Gozo, Malta --Poco a poco 09:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 18:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris), Cathedral Cave, Gozo, Malta --Poco a poco 09:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 18:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New Lyon metro --Billy69150 08:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ozanam high school, Rue Saint-Gabriel, in Lille, France --Velvet 08:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eclectic house, Rue Daguerre 10, Lille, France --Velvet 08:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little Venice from the rue de Turenne bridge in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Construction site of the Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed line in Eggolsheim --Ermell 06:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Construction site of the Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed line in Eggolsheim --Ermell 06:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thiou river in Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Couvent de la Visitation in Thonon-les-Bains, France. --Tournasol7 04:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Symphorian church in Excenevex, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amanita muscaria near Lac de Mines, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Julian Baumgartlinger, footballplayer of Austria. --Steindy 18:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sebastian Prödl, footballplayer of Austria. --Steindy 18:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Stone statue of Adjona, Candelaria --Mike Peel 17:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Stone statue of Acaymo, Candelaria --Mike Peel 17:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Stone statue of Acaymo, Candelaria --Mike Peel 17:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: bioluminescent mushroom, mycena lucentipes in Costa Rica --Snowmanstudios 12:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Barrier mask next to a small plant on the sidewalk. --Touam 12:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе, Москва --Ulaisaeva 08:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе, Москва --Ulaisaeva 08:19, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе, Москва --Ulaisaeva 08:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе, Москва --Ulaisaeva 08:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rampart on moat of the citadel of Lille, Parc de la Citadelle, in Lille, France --Velvet 07:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Quarry Bank Mill --Mike Peel 06:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Can you check the right wall. It looks curved and leaning in a bit. --C messier 09:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
@C messier: Good spot! I've uploaded a new version that fixes this (enabling lens profile corrections). Does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --C messier 10:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review
editFile:Shimla-Cityscape-04-gje.jpg
edit- Nomination Cityscape of Shimla by Gerd Eichmann —UnpetitproleX 20:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose perspective, unsharp and disturbing object. Sorry --Ezarate 22:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
{{o}}I don't really see any problem with the perspective, and considering the image resolution offered, no significant problem with the slight image noise or lack of sharpness either. But while I usually consider compositional issues to be secondary, I'm sorry to say that in this case, that branch in the foreground really ruins the photo. --Smial 09:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)- Comment The branch is very easy to remove. --A.Savin 10:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Ok for QI. --Tagooty 04:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Chhusang_fields.jpg
edit- Nomination Chhusang fields by Jmhullot --UnpetitproleX 08:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
OpposeQI to me if the CA is removed --Poco a poco 18:55, 5 June 2022 (UTC)- Support Good quality now --MIGORMCZ 13:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Heavy CAs, esp. bottom left.--Palauenc05 14:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC){{o}}Strong CA. Otherwise very good. --Smial 09:39, 13 June 2022 (UTC)- Comment The CA has not been removed, and since I'm on vacation I wouldn't be able to remove them. Will re-nominate in the future, or someone else could remove the CA. -- UnpetitproleX 12:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, I gave it a try. New version uploaded. I strike through my vote but cannot support as I'm now a co-author Poco a poco 11:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: CA now well handled, but very low resolution. And a watermark. Accidental? --Smial 11:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Resolution has been majorly reduced, also a {{retouched image}} template would be better than a watermark. Perhaps you could fix, Poco? --UnpetitproleX 12:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- How embarrassing, sorry, that wasn't my intention, I used by mistake the export settings I used for some Insta media. I exported it again. --Poco a poco 07:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support I would give a support for the latest version. Greetings --Dirtsc 08:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Now full Support per Dirtsc. --Smial (talk) 09:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support Satisfactory. -- Ikan Kekek 15:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
File:A_wintry_morning_in_Vijaynagar.jpg
edit- Nomination: Vijaynagar, Arunachal Pradesh by Arunachal2007 --UnpetitproleX 22:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Too bluish in my eyes. --Milseburg 20:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice image and not too blue IMO. However, the image is rather small for a 12MP camera and for this kind of shot. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Colours look ok, but I would expect at least about 6 MPixels for landscape photography. --Smial 09:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Question Even in 2011? This photo was uploaded 11 years ago. -- Ikan Kekek 14:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Well, in 2011 the image might still have been acceptable, because there were still many cameras from the 6 Mpixel CCD class on the road, but it is now, at the time of candidacy, 2022. I am still against raising the hard limit of 2 Mpixels, because this would exclude some good images that were taken under very difficult conditions. But landscape photos, studio shots, architectural images etc. that are candidates today should have at least 6 Mpixels. Alternatively, at least 2000 pixels at the shorter edge of the image, which would then still allow square cropped images with four Mpixels and at the same time exclude endless panorama tubes with only 1000 pixels vertically. --Smial 23:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- I thought we were supposed to judge 2011 photos by 2011 standards at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 03:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Even if that were the case (I know of no such written rule): in 2011 there were already a large number of cameras with more than 6 MPixels and the presented image would also have been at the lower tolerable limit for the above-mentioned areas of photography at that time. I have no problem with being outvoted if others see it differently. After all, I am not the Pope ;-) --Smial 06:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note that I haven't voted, because I'm not sure it's good enough. I make some allowances for when a photo was taken and how much resolution the camera had, but I don't have really clear internal senses of what the standard was in 2011, as opposed to 2015 or 2008. I do have higher standards for photos taken more recently, though. -- Ikan Kekek 20:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Even if that were the case (I know of no such written rule): in 2011 there were already a large number of cameras with more than 6 MPixels and the presented image would also have been at the lower tolerable limit for the above-mentioned areas of photography at that time. I have no problem with being outvoted if others see it differently. After all, I am not the Pope ;-) --Smial 06:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- I thought we were supposed to judge 2011 photos by 2011 standards at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 03:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Усадьба_Царицыно_Люстра_в_Екатерининском_зале.jpg
edit- Nomination Усадьба Царицыно, Люстра в Екатерининском зале, Москва --Ulaisaeva 09:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree! The photo should be rotated (see the horizontal). --Steindy 15:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Per Steindy. --aismallard 02:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Support I can see no quality issues with this image, Greetings --Dirtsc 08:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC) - Support Good quality.--Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:41, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)