Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 21 2024

Consensual review

edit

File:Euploea_Core_Butterfly.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Euploea Core --Frameofashik 18:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 12:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Strange noise distribution, some parts are extremely noisy/grainy and others are without noise but blurry. But even without noise, IMO the picture isn't sharp enough. --Plozessor 13:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 19:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Алматы,_роща_Баума,_гусиный_лук.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Yellow star of Bethlehem, Baum grove. Turksib District, Almaty, Kazakhstan. By User:ElenaLitera --Красный 00:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 12:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose IMO the flower is slightly out of focus, which is visible even at 2 MP. The upper part of the flower looks also a bit overexposed. The focus is on the leaves above the flower. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Yes, focus is on some culm in background, and the flower is lacking detail. --Plozessor 13:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 19:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Napa_Valley_Wine_Train_Silverado_car_interior.gk.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The interior of the Silverado car, a converted Pullman car from 1915, on the Napa Valley Wine Train. --Grendelkhan 09:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Benjism89 13:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Before QI you need to correct the perspective --Poco a poco 19:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Done Perspective corrected, thanks. --Grendelkhan 23:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Looks ok now, thanks,   Support Poco a poco 18:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think even with this correction applied, the level of detail due to overprocessing (intense de-noising and sharpening) is too low. --August Geyler (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality after PC. Sharpness is ok. --Sebring12Hrs 17:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 07:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Fluffy_pigeon_at_Manasota_Key_Beach,_side_view.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination A feral pigeon, Columba livia, standing on the sand at Manasota Key Beach in Charlotte County, Florida. The pigeon is fluffed up against the cold. --Grendelkhan 09:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 12:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Motion blur in head --Poco a poco 18:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Poco a poco. --Sebring12Hrs 14:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 14:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Sts_Peter_&_Paul_church_in_Baja_(3).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination: Sts Peter and Paul church in Baja, Bács-Kiskun County, Hungary. --Tournasol7 04:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality --Llez 04:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The image seems to be underexposed. Perhaps it can be brightened. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 07:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Not so dark for a bad weather. --Sebring12Hrs 19:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Spurzem. --GRDN711 18:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support --GoldenArtists 20:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 07:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment Spurzem, GRDN711, Kallerna; New version uploaded, is it better? --Tournasol7 19:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 07:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)