Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 29 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Sud_saharien_tunisien.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Petit bateau avec drapeau tunisien. By User:Khaoula Laghmani --Touzrimounir 22:20, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose Are you somewhat ignorant to advises? Why do you constantly nominate images which are not eligible? This again is below minimum size requirement. --Cccefalon 04:11, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
    Sorry I haven't saw it --Touzrimounir 05:07, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Are you nuts? Consensual review is not for discussing photos which are NOT ELIGIBLE. What you are doing here is shere trolling. --Cccefalon 05:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC) *   Comment please, stay friendly, Uwe, with as much AGF as possible! --Hubertl 06:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
      Comment It's hard to stay calm, after that long time that I see the nominations of that user. It feels like he is unloading here any photo that was taken in Tunisia without taking care, whether it is fullfilling the simple requirements of eligibility or quality. That is a kind of abuse of QIC and a waste of time of the reviewers. It makes me really angry. --Cccefalon 06:24, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Well below minimun resolution, yet not very sharp, and bad bottom crop. --C messier 11:14, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Info I set it to decline, because it is not eligible. --Cccefalon 19:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --C messier 11:14, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Neuschwanstein,_Schwangau,_Alemania,_2015-02-15,_DD_29.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Germany --Poco a poco 17:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Sorry, the sky is heavily overexposed (even considering that the weather condition was probably not the best). --Code 11:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • I think that this decline is a bit tough, overexposure is not a big issue here IMHO. Please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 19:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Maybe it's more a matter of composition then. I don't think that it's always possible to take a QI even if you do everything right technically. Sometimes weather and light don't allow to take a good photo. --Code 20:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry,per Code --Livioandronico2013 12:06, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too bright. No good light for a good photo. -- Spurzem 14:47, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 16:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Trans Sibir.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Trans-Siberian railway in winter. --PetarM 15:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 16:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: Chromatic aberrations. Also the snow is unfortunately covering parts of the face of the man in tghe middle. --Cccefalon 16:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC) Cccefalon
  •   Comment where is CA, mark it. Yes its snowing otherwise. That man is irrelevant. --PetarM 17:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sorry. Advice: dont pixel peep so much. Its way beyond some good taste. --PetarM 07:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  Comment You want a "I like it"? Then Facebook is the right choice for you. Here you get a photographic review - but unfortunately you cannot cope with critics to obvious flaws. Too bad, you miss a chance to enhance your skills. --Cccefalon 08:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

*  Weak support Removed CAs   Done....Peace & Love --Livioandronico2013 17:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Livio, you cannot support your own work, can you? --Cccefalon 05:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Ops...you are right Cccefalon,my fault   --Livioandronico2013 07:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me --DKrieger 22:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI --Σπάρτακος 22:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me--Billy69150 16:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 13:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Petros_from_Goverla.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Карпатський, Яремчанська міська рада, Верховинський район, Надвірнянський район. By User:Stanislav Rico --Base 19:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Beautiful.   Support -- Spurzem 20:24, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unnatural vignetting. I also think, this is barely more than a button-size image. We do not encourage downsampled or tiny landscape images and this is for me a strong oppose for serving the QI seal. --Cccefalon 06:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose it could be FP without the vignetting, but not even QI with it; per Cccefalon. --Kadellar 20:24, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 10:14, 28 June 2015 (UTC)