Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 04 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 033.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mountain hike of Gimillan (1805m.) At Colle Tsa Sètse Cogne Valley (Italy).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose WB needs adjustment - it is too much on the yellow side --Uoaei1 18:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  •   Done Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 19:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 09:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 23:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 00:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Casa_de_los_Dragones,_Ceuta,_España,_2015-12-10,_DD_95-97_HDR.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Casa de los Dragones ("House of Dragons"), Ceuta, Spain --Poco a poco 18:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Sorry, too much noise --A.Savin 14:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree, for me it´s ok. --Hubertl 15:20, 28 February 2016
  •   Support For me it is good. -- Spurzem 07:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)(UTC)
      New version with selective denoising improvements Poco a poco 17:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Yes, but now parts are very soft and denoising artefacts are visible, I still wouldn't promote it this way. --A.Savin 13:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
A.Savin, I have checked it again and cannot see any areas that became soft, I think that the last version is a clear improvement to the previous one. Can you please add a note in the area where you see a worsening with the last version? Poco a poco 18:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 05:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)