Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 17 2015

Consensual review

edit

File:Recke,_St.-Dionysius-Kirche_--_2014_--_9705_--_Ausschnitt.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination St.-Dionysius-Kirche, Recke, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn   Oppose Too small resolution. In 2015 we need bigger images. --Halavar 11:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      I withdraw my nomination Ups. Sorry. The picture I slipped accidentally in my nomination list. I beg your indulgence.--XRay 12:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, the image should have at leat 2 MP, is has 2.3 MP. (It's an extract.). IMO that fulfills ou rules.--XRay 06:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose Unsharp even at the small size. Die 2 mpix sind eine absolute Untergrenze. Das heißt nicht, daß jedes Bild ab 2.01 mpix groß genug ist. Auch das steht in den Regeln, sinngemäß „für Aufnahmen, die keine besondere Schwierigkeit darstellen, wird eine höhere Auflösung erwartet“. Ich such den Satz jetzt nicht extra raus. --Kreuzschnabel 08:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •   I withdraw my nomination again. Thanks for your reviews. I'm withdrawing the image, so we can spend our time for other reviews. (I'd added an additional comment on the talk page.) --XRay 16:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Head_of_Diphilos_in_Palazzo_Massimo_(Rome).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Head of Diphilos in Palazzo Massimo (Rome) --Livioandronico2013 08:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It needs perspective correction and DoF is missing. --XRay 06:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
      Done Excuse me but I don't agree. I used 7.1 when nomrmally is less.--Livioandronico2013 06:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support Perspective OK now, IMO could be better, but it's acceptable. --XRay 18:12, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Magdeburg Skulpturenpark 2613.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Statue at Skulpturenpark Magdeburg --Ailura 09:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Some magenta CA and background visibly tilted (both fixable). Crop of the hand very unfortunate. Head is out of focus (not fixable), hence no QI for me, sorry. --Cccefalon 09:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
    • Worked on CA and tilt and don't think the back of the head of a statue needs to be the focus point. --Ailura 06:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The cut-off hand is a no-go for me too, sorry. You may either take a full view of the upper body or a detailed view of one part, but this way it’s neither fish nor fowl. --Kreuzschnabel 07:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, very bad framing--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined Code 06:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Bardentreffen_2014_Sa_2160.JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination Abdoul Wahab Berthe, Habib Koité (Mali), appearance at the 39th music festival "Bardentreffen" 2014 in Nuremberg, Germany, Schuett island stage. By User:Rs-foto --Achim Raschka 07:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Nice sharpness, but strange crop imho. It doesn't work for me, it's too tight (specially upper side) and the crop of the guitar at left is not optimal. Feel free to send it to CR to hear more opinions, direct oppose is a bit strong for this one. --Kadellar 13:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
  • suggest to discuss in CR. The photo is not staged, but taken under live concert conditions. I ask to condider this. --Rs-foto 09:47, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI to me. --Palauenc05 07:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I agree, bad composition. Circumstances of a capture should be irrelevant to QI. Whether you have to dangle over a 1000ft drop or you can take the photo without getting out of bed, the technical aspects are the same. Location may influence value judgments, but not quality ones. Mattbuck 22:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined Code 06:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

File:St Casimir Church Interior 3, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination St. Casimir Church interior. Vilnius, Lithuania. (by Diliff) --Pofka 11:44, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ximonic 16:41, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very distorted and much too bright. No QI for me. -- Spurzem 20:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support brightness and distortion do not bother me, it's maybe a bit noisy but widely acceptable --Christian Ferrer 09:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Per Spurzem --Livioandronico2013 20:41, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • weak   Support Good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted Code 06:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)