Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 11 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Vandykeexpresso-MDP.1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Coffee shop Van Dyke expresso, San Lorenzo and Olavarría, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 21:31, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose --C messier 21:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment why C messier? --Ezarate 22:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
      •   Comment Sorry, I thought had writen it. It has lens flares and overexposed surfaces. --C messier 12:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose To my eyes, too many parts are blown, there's a weird phantom ball of light to the left of a lamppost, and some parts of the photo look very unnatural, such as some of the trees. -- Ikan Kekek 08:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per C messier and Ikan Kekek. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

File:2020_Kaplica_na_Cierniaku_4.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Chapel on Cierniak 3 --Jacek Halicki 13:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but the highlights (facade) is overburned. --Nefronus 22:12, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Seems acceptable to me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. Even with sunshine on the white exterior, there is detail. --GRDN711 02:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support clearly QI --Lmbuga 23:11, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Strong support --Commonists 11:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

File:St_Symphorian_church_in_Tersannes_13.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Saint Symphorian church in Tersannes, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol7 05:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Sorry: perspective distorted, building incomplete. --F. Riedelio 07:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment Sorry, but I desagree, discuss please. --Tournasol7 21:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

*  Comment The top-left portion looks really distorted + the appearance of the clouds adds to that perception. Perhaps this was the cropped left part of a landscape-oriented photo? --Nefronus 05:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

  •   Comment The image isn't looking natural due to the perspective distortion as others have pointed out. I don't have any problem with the building being incomplete. If perspective is corrected I can probably change my vote. --Navneetsharmaiit 09:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
    •   New version uploaded, Tournasol7 20:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Question Does the steeple really lean like that? -- Ikan Kekek 21:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment It seems that yes. All lines are verticals (windows, walls, doors) without steeple. Tournasol7 05:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK, then good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support It's ok for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK. --A.Savin 13:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Navneetsharmaiit 17:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Lmbuga (talk) 23:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support The new version is certainly better, I change my vote to support. Nefronus 05:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Nefronus If you change your mind delete your old vote, thanks--Commonists 11:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)