Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 12 2018
-
- Nomination Mount Carmel West Hospital Main Entrance -- Sixflashphoto 02:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Genoa Township Administration Building -- Sixflashphoto 02:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grange amidst of fields and pastures in Hohenfeld #4, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building in Hohenfeld #3, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Meadows and forest in Hohenfeld, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grange amidst of fields and pastures in Hohenfeld #4 and locality Tuderschitz, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief of a grotesque on the front of St Anne's church, Liverpool --Rodhullandemu 22:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. Out of focus --The Photographer 00:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Central Mountain Massif from Pico do Areeiro, Madeira, Portugal. --Lmbuga 22:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --The Photographer 00:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bear statue (Yerevan). Metallic statue by Ara Alekyan. --Armenak Margarian 20:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spiš Castle --Jakubhal 20:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spiš Castle --Jakubhal 20:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tutshi River, British Columbia, Canada --Poco a poco 18:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 21:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bernard Lake, British Columbia, Canada --Poco a poco 18:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 20:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carcross Desert, Yukon, Canada --Poco a poco 18:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 20:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Border cross through the Top of the World Highway, Yukon, Canada --Poco a poco 18:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 20:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alaska Highway over the White River, Beaver Creek, Yukon, Canada --Poco a poco 18:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The site of the new town center of Kiruna with the new city hall under construction. --ArildV 16:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 17:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kirche Werbellin --Ralf Roletschek 16:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 20:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Museum Schokland. Old wooden rowboat.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Granada 16:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Museum Schokland. Old wooden rowboat.
-
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Fog horn house on the mound.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Granada 16:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Fog horn house on the mound.
-
- Nomination Barge "Imperiale" in Paris. --Lmbuga 15:57, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 20:14, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bacchus after Poussin. Versailles. -V13 --Lmbuga 15:57, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel Dakol in Petrovice u Karviné, Karviná District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic --T.Bednarz 15:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline unsharp, not QI for me, sorry --Armenak Margarian 20:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama over Germany's northernmost district on the island of Sylt--Milseburg 13:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A young lamb kneeling to eat grass. Taken near Great Missenden, UK. --Prosthetic Head 13:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice and crisp. --Peulle 18:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bad Froi in Bad Froi South Tyrol --Moroder 11:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion The air is somewhat problematic. But the picture is good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kaiserbad (Lázně I), Karlovy Vary (Karlsbad, Czech republic), main entrance --Isiwal 09:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black tower (Černá věž) in Loket (czech Republic) --Isiwal 09:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The former Hotel Berliner Hof, Františkovy Lázně (Franzensbad), Czech Republic --Isiwal 09:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Square of king George of Podebrad in Cheb, Czech Republic --Isiwal 09:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle (Czech Republic), Church of Saint Wenceslaus and bridge over Ohře (Eger) --Isiwal 09:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bismarck tower on Wielka Sowa 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bismarck tower on Wielka Sowa 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel on Wielka Sowa 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 11:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel on Wielka Sowa 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BTS on Wielka Sowa --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 09:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farmhouse Hintner in Verdings Klausen, South Tyrol. --Moroder 07:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The nave inside St Marys Cathedral, Newcastle, England --Mdbeckwith 06:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ford Mustang GT 1965 at the Prichsenstadt Classics 2018 --Ermell 06:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windmills behind Lisberg Castle --Ermell 06:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Evangelical Lutheran parish church in Mühlhausen (Pommersfelden) --Ermell 06:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Easter fountain in Neustädtlein am Forst --Ermell 06:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Italy, Lecce, Via Isabella Castriota --Berthold Werner 06:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lelietje-van-dalen (Convallaria majalis). Flowers.
--Famberhorst 05:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Lelietje-van-dalen (Convallaria majalis). Flowers.
-
- Nomination Vogelmelk (Ornithogalum) Bloem en bloemknoppen
--Famberhorst 05:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Vogelmelk (Ornithogalum) Bloem en bloemknoppen
-
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Icebreakers on the former island.
--Famberhorst 05:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Icebreakers on the former island.
-
- Nomination 33 53 9332 586-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.--GT1976 05:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 31 56 3536 080-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.--GT1976 05:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 31 81 5377 227-8 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.--GT1976 05:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 31 81 4668 098-4 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.--GT1976 05:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kiruna city hall.--ArildV 04:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 15:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stairs at Hospital Umberto I --Rodrigo.Argenton 03:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Comment The file description is inaccurate/insufficient --Moroder 11:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. CA, stitching error --Moroder 11:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Moroder could you pleas point where is the stitching error? Rodrigo.Argenton 13:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Comment I put a note. Why use f/3.5? I guess you used a Tripod. BTW please put the {{Panorama}} template with these stitched photos Cheers --Moroder 16:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Moroder too many people passing by, this was at a exposition, and it's a corridor. And now I remember what I did, not a error, it was a solution, trust me. But, well, I removed the line. And this are not CA, not green and purples in this photo, some red are the showdowns of the yellow. Rodrigo.Argenton 17:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medieval street name sign "Sieh um Dich" (Look around) in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 17:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat --Milan Bališin 19:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality fo me. Interesting motif. --Milseburg 20:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Early 20th Century Fireman's Protective Equipment. By User:CustomKlicks --Shizhao 03:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Insufficient quality. Below minimum size. Furthermore I think, the main subject is too dark and is lacking details. --Milseburg 14:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Desert elephant (Loxodonta africana) baby male, Namibia --Charlesjsharp 09:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 14:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Brussels Central Station from platform 3 --Trougnouf 00:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Brussels Central Station platform 3 --Trougnouf 00:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Un vieux mètier au port de jijel en algerie c'est le mètier du conjadeur. By User:Mokhtarjet7 --Reda Kerbouche 16:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- Review
Something strange happened on the edge of his orange tool (and the right of the blue cord to a lesser degree) --Trougnouf 21:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:Detalhe_do_retrato_de_Dom_Pedro_I_(01).jpg edit
- Nomination Portrait of Dom Pedro I --Rodrigo.Argenton 17:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Insufficient quality: harsh light, lack of sharpness. --Peulle 19:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Harsh light, lack of sharpness? come on. Rodrigo.Argenton 22:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Peulle better? Rodrigo.Argenton 00:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, but I don't think there's any way this photo can become a QI. As Granada says the light (while I think it's a bit too harsh/glary, not sure how to explain it; it's too white, too much light on the forehead and top left) is not the main problem. The main problem is the lack of sharpness. I know it's difficult to shoot paintings at FP standards (I have not yet managed it myself), but if you take a look at this page, you can see how much sharper the current FP portraits are. That's the level of quality we must expect. I appreciate your contribution of paintings to Commons; we need more such images and if you manage to take a high quality photo of such an historic painting, I'd be more than happy to support its nomination in the future, even for FP in addition to the QI status.--Peulle (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Peulle you are supporting images at FPC that have less sharpness than this, put it at the same size [1]... and we are at QIC. Rodrigo.Argenton 13:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry if I was being unclear; what I meant to say was that if this image had sufficient sharpness, I could even support it for FP.--Peulle 18:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Peulle you are supporting images at FPC that have less sharpness than this, put it at the same size [1]... and we are at QIC. Rodrigo.Argenton 13:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, but I don't think there's any way this photo can become a QI. As Granada says the light (while I think it's a bit too harsh/glary, not sure how to explain it; it's too white, too much light on the forehead and top left) is not the main problem. The main problem is the lack of sharpness. I know it's difficult to shoot paintings at FP standards (I have not yet managed it myself), but if you take a look at this page, you can see how much sharper the current FP portraits are. That's the level of quality we must expect. I appreciate your contribution of paintings to Commons; we need more such images and if you manage to take a high quality photo of such an historic painting, I'd be more than happy to support its nomination in the future, even for FP in addition to the QI status.--Peulle (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Peulle better? Rodrigo.Argenton 00:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Harsh light, lack of sharpness? come on. Rodrigo.Argenton 22:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - Very glary, and the picture of the whole painting, though too dark, clearly demonstrates that the glare is not in the painting but from a light source. -- Ikan Kekek 05:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- What's "glary"?
- See another picture, not by me File:Oscar Pereira da Silva - Retrato de D. Pedro I, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg
- The light source was a 10 am sun from a 5 m window passing trough a curtain, so... diffuse soft and big light source, it's from the painting, as you could see if you opened the file page. Rodrigo.Argenton 05:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose The glare on the top left is not the biggest problem I have with this photo. In particular it is just unsharp. --Granada 06:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- The glare of the forehead? The painter glare, as here Rodrigo.Argenton 13:14, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Granada? And how this is unsharp? Do you know that is a painting in a wood, right? Rodrigo.Argenton 06:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- There are lot of cracks in the wood. If the image was sharp you could see a lot more detail in these structures. --Granada 07:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- The glare of the forehead? The painter glare, as here Rodrigo.Argenton 13:14, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Granada? And how this is unsharp? Do you know that is a painting in a wood, right? Rodrigo.Argenton 06:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Stitching artifacts, partly doubled contours, cloning/retouching artifacts, lighting unsufficient. --Smial 08:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Doubled contours are from the painting, I fix some issues at the edge. Rodrigo.Argenton 13:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)