Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 22 2017
-
- Nomination Portal eines Weinkellers in der Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 04:54, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, detail. Front view.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, detail. Front view.
-
- Nomination Interior of the Abbey, Monastery Endowment of the Holy Grave, Heiligengrabe, Brandenburg, Germany --XRay 02:20, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Congrats! Genuine solid work! Excellent quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westdeutsche Lotterie, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:20, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apse of the subsidiary church Saint Cyriacus with cemetery, Hohenthurn, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Jakubhal 04:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northern view of the subsidiary church Saint Cyriacus with cemetery, Hohenthurn, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Cyriacus with cemetery, Hohenthurn, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Kapin (mountain) and the Göriacher Berg (mountain), Hohenthurn, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Corazziere on guard in the court of the Quirinal Palace in Rome. --Moroder 00:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Bravo! E buon composizione. -- Ikan Kekek 04:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Cathedral square, Halberstadt, Saxony-Anhalt/Germany --PtrQs 00:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The empty square with the long shadows reminds me of De Chirico, except for the cars and such. -- Ikan Kekek 04:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lighthouse 'Phare de la Vieille' in the 'Raz de Sein', Bretagne/France --PtrQs 00:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Bonne qualité. -- Ikan Kekek 04:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the stone run on the summit of Kleiner Gleichberg southward --Milseburg 19:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ercé 19:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from a stone run on Kleiner Gleichberg to northeast --Milseburg 19:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 20:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Weather vane, Sotavento, Xermade, Galicia (Spain).--Lmbuga 19:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pantheon (Rome) - Dome interior --Livioandronico2013 18:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wind turbine, Sotavento. Momán, Xermade, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 18:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Devil bargains with God over Job's faith in Duomo (San Gimignano) --Livioandronico2013 18:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Peulle 18:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks --Livioandronico2013 18:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Rome from the Pincio in . --Moroder 18:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination King Norodom statue. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 17:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion I'm not sure but this one seems a bit underexposed. In any case, please remove the dust spot in the sky. --Basotxerri 17:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Done I did both things right now. New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 17:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination King Norodom statue. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 17:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buddhist small shrine. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 17:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Everything there looks the same, doesn't it? :-) Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination King Norodom stupa. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 17:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wijnjeterper Schar, Natura 2000 area of Friesland province. Holle sand road.
--Famberhorst 17:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Wijnjeterper Schar, Natura 2000 area of Friesland province. Holle sand road.
-
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, (garden) Watercourse with lindes.
--Famberhorst 17:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 18:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, (garden) Watercourse with lindes.
-
- Nomination Underground gas pipeline sign and substation in the Elgea mountain range. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 17:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Summit of Galbarrain in the Elgea mountain range, mountaineer's mailbox. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 17:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Summit of Tunelgaina and quarry at the Lizarraga mountain pass, quarry. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 16:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tunnel at the Lizarraga mountain pass. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 16:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 19:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake of Crocoparc Agadir, Morocco. By User:Egor Kozhuh --Reda benkhadra 14:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough, not a QI. --Basotxerri 16:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cape Three Forks, Nador, Morocco. By User:Ouadie El farouki --Reda benkhadra 14:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough IMO and a dust spot on the water has to be removed. The filter you used for the sky is too strong as well. Looks as if you reduced the file size too much in relation to the size of the photography. --Ermell 19:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Atlas Cedar at Tichoukte mountains, Boulemane province, Morocco. By User:Aziz aitakka --Reda benkhadra 14:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough for me to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 16:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Garden locust (Acanthacris ruficornis), Ghana --Charlesjsharp 14:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good! GC --Basotxerri 16:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Variegated grasshopper (Zonocerus variegatus), female, Ghana --Charlesjsharp 14:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 16:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ziz River, south of Morocco. By User:Melminou --Reda benkhadra 14:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, oversaturated, a lot of CAs all over the picture, unsharp and noisy --Llez 20:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture "Playing with the wind" by Amancio Gonzáles, Morro Jable, Fuerteventura --Llez 14:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture "Cabeza de Mujer" by Antonina Fathullina, Morro Jable, Fuerteventura --Llez 14:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bamble church, constructed in 1845. --Peulle 14:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Maybe you could add a material related categorie --Ermell 14:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Thank you for your review - I will look into improving the categories later. :) --Peulle 15:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wallachian Open Air Museum, Czech Republic - church --Pudelek 12:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Toyota Celica --Berthold Werner 12:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Disturbing background is unavoidable. --Peulle 12:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angermünde (Brandenburg): former post office --A.Savin 11:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Tournasol7 13:04, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angermünde (Brandenburg): town hall detail --A.Savin 11:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Tournasol7 13:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve Krausenbechhofen --Ermell 09:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Staggering. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve Krausenbechhofen --Ermell 09:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Gorgious. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic parish church of St. Bartolomäus in Willersdorf (Hallerndorf) --Ermell 09:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Comment Pardon me if I give some suggestion: the colors are too vivid. Crop the bottom, clone out the top righ wood structure and the almost completely cut station of the cross on the left- Servus --Moroder 10:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Done I think I choose the wrong version. Have a look at the new one and thanks for your review.--Ermell 14:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 15:38, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baroque pulpit in Basilica of St. Paulinus, Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 07:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment Can you do something about the color fringes on windows? --A.Savin 11:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC) --Palauenc05 15:51, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 Market Square in Wałbrzych 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Overall good quality; the perspectives seem correct, the buildings are not entirely straight. Some improvements can be made by cloning out the spots from birds in the sky. --Peulle 07:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 Market Square in Wałbrzych 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 07:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 Market Square in Wałbrzych 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 Market Square in Wałbrzych 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 Market Square in Wałbrzych 5 --Jacek Halicki 06:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate. Side View.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate. Side View.
-
- Nomination Panorama.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Panorama.
-
- Nomination Shoah Memorial at the Pinkas Synagogue, Prague, Czech Republic --Uoaei1 04:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ilse in the Ilsetal in Harz National Park near Ilsenburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany --XRay 04:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside chapel (erected during the first half of the 19th century) on Federauner Strasse in Oberfederaun, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Perhaps the building leans slightly to the right, but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Comment You are right, Agnes. The chapel does lean to the right. You can see it from the vertikal bars of the white fence on the left side. -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
OK. Thank you--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museum of the fortifications in Hlučín-Darkovičky, Czech Silesia --Pudelek 21:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:57, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museum of the fortifications in Hlučín-Darkovičky, Czech Silesia --Pudelek 21:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grandes escaliers de la cité religieuse de Rocamadour, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 21:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 08:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamlet Belcastel in Lacave, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 21:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline At least the chapel seems too unsharp, not a QI for me, sorry. --Basotxerri 16:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African pied wagtail (Motacilla aguimp vidua) male, Ghana --Charlesjsharp 20:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The tail and also the legs are not sharp. Tournasol7 21:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
{{o}}1,701 × 1,134 pixels are not two megapixels, sorry. It's nice IMO --Lmbuga 22:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
My mistake. Larger file uploaded. @Lmbuga: Charlesjsharp 08:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Support Nice --Lmbuga 16:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berlin: former Tempelhof airfield --A.Savin 08:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grottgera Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Interesting shot; those conditions on the right are caused by morning mist, is that correct? Judging from the left side, though, the image could use some denoising.--Peulle 07:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)@Peulle: Done --Jacek Halicki 10:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC) Support OK.--Peulle 13:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Saturnin Church of Le Bourg, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 21:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion It's a bit deformed, please correct the verticals --Michielverbeek 05:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Done, it's better now? Tournasol7 13:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes! --Michielverbeek 05:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Peter Church of Assier, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 22:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Is not sharp enough --Cvmontuy 13:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gagarin Park in Tyumen --N 3 14 15 92 65 16:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Review * Comment Sorry, I already nominated before. Very good quality.--SKas 21:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes, and I promoted it with comments. One thing I mentioned was that I liked the irony of the forest park photo with the active smokestacks in the background. -- Ikan Kekek 13:12, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Assier, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 23:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC) Tone curves may be improved Ezarate 22:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline No all is in focus next time try ISO 100, F11 --Cvmontuy 12:57, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review
editFile:Quirinale_Cappella_Paolina_base_del_balcone_Roma.jpg
edit- Nomination Detail of the base of the balcony of the Cappella Paolina chapel in the Quirinal Palace in Rome. --Moroder 18:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Good light and compo, but unfortunately blurred everywhere. --A.Savin 08:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO too blurry, sorry. --Basotxerri 17:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Cuíca - Marmosa paraguayana.jpg
edit- Nomination Cuíca - Marmosa paraguayana by User:Renato Augusto Martins--Rodrigo Padula 15:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Ercé 16:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Needs much better categories and the photo is probably downsampled. This needs to be fixed first. --W.carter 17:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 22:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 04:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I guess the category for the Roman name was added. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- And as with the photo below, it's inadmissible not to credit the photographer. I've added his information, but Rodrigo Padula, next time, you need to do it. -- Ikan Kekek 07:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment 1. @W.carter: How do you know it has been downsampled? 2. If it has been, then we must all oppose Images should not be downsampled. Charlesjsharp 14:57, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- See my answer below on the second nom. --W.carter 17:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Perereca-macaco - Phyllomedusa rohdei.jpg
edit- Nomination Perereca-macaco - Phyllomedusa rohdei by User:Renato Augusto Martins --Rodrigo Padula 15:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Ercé 16:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Needs much better categories and the photo is probably downsampled. This needs to be fixed first. --W.carter 17:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support Category created. Down-sampling seems fine here considering the shallow DOF in this pose. Jkadavoor 07:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Question - I respect your opinion from your experience, but would you have down-sampled this much? -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- First, I would like to thank W.carter for bringing this to Consensual Review; that's why I noticed this on this busy week (for me). 1. I noticed that nominator and photographer are different. I noticed no species category exists for this frog. It is difficult for a new user to create a well defined category; so I decided to help. 2. And for down-sampling, it depends on several parameters. I well lighted macro in base ISO need not be down-sampled. That's why some of my FPs are 24MP. But when I started a diffuser that cuts a lot of light and I forced to use ISO 320/400, I need to down-sample them to 80%. If I shoot at ISO 800, I need to down-sample a lot more. Other than this, this particular angle of a frog photo needs a lot of DOF which is not possible to achieve in a larger resolution. (No need to downsample and reviewers can review the image in a reasonable resolution is a good argument. But Unfortunately my experience is not many people follow it. They simply check the image in 100% and reject.) 3. The image can be cropped; not down-sampled. I didn't check the EXIF in detail; sometimes it mention the subject distance which self explains whether it is a crop. Jkadavoor 04:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Rodrigo Padula, please mention the author as I added here while nominating other's works. Jkadavoor 12:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I have to support, because what a gesture! However, like W.carter, I question the size. -- Ikan Kekek 07:04, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment My reason for bringing this to CR is not because I question the quality of the photo, they are all very good, but a QI is also about getting all that boring "paperwork" such as description, categories, crediting the photographer, etc. right. Since this involves a user and photographer that seem to be relatively new to QIC, it is better to get things right from the beginning, hoping they may contribute with more of these beautiful photos. Right now the rules says "no downsampling" and I think we should respect that. These bunch of photos seems to be sort of routinely downsampled since the photographer is unfamiliar with our rules. Several of these pics could be FPCs and that section is relentless when it comes to downsampling, it would be a shame if that should stand it the way of a good photo. --cart-Talk 09:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment 1. @W.carter: How do you know it has been downsampled? 2. If it has been, then we must all oppose Images should not be downsampled. Charlesjsharp 14:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp, not sure you get this 'ping' since they don't work all the time in these QIC templates. I'm not absolutely sure they are downsampled, which is why I wrote "probably" and "seems" downsampled. I had a look at this photographer's photos and 25 of the 26 photos of animals uploaded so far, taken with a 4288x2848 camera are 2144x1424. The landscapes are larger. That raised a question mark for me and I wrote in a related review (above May 17) asking about this to get this clarified rather than 'oppose'. I also had a look at the comments made in another review (above May 15) between the nominator and another reviewer that suggests the photos are downsampled: "Comment Your camera can shoot a larger version than this, do you have one?--Peulle 20:47, 15 May 2017 (UTC)It will be uploaded soon Rodrigo Padula 15:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)"
- I'm hoping all have larger versions and they get uploaded.
- When it comes to the policy of downsampling, I'm no expert by any means, I just try to follow it as best I can and that discussion would be better to have at say this page's talk page where policy changes should be discussed. Here is where we review photos and try to follow the policy currently in use. --W.carter 15:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- I wonder why the nominator doesn't respond? The photographer could be taking images on small image setting that many cameras have I suppose. Charlesjsharp 21:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)