Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 01 2016

• 
  • Nomination Neopithecops zalmora --Vengolis 04:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chilades pandava --Vengolis 04:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brachydiplax chalybea --Vengolis 04:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brachydiplax chalybea --Vengolis 04:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thunbergia laurifolia --Vengolis 04:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Pride of Baltimore II on the Chester River --Acroterion 03:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion The Pride makes us proud. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 03:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Bonne qualité. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 03:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 03:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Très jolie. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Florian in the Saint Mary chapel in Rohrbach-Berg (Upper Austria), part of pilgrim trail Böhmerwald. --Haeferl 03:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Station of the cross at Rohrbach-Berg in Upper-Austria, part of pilgrim trail Böhmerwald. --Haeferl 03:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lourdes Chapel in Rohrbach-Berg, part of the pilgrim trail Böhmerwald. --Haeferl 03:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Consolation of Mary in Rohrbach-Berg (Upper Austria), part of the pilgrim trail Böhmerwald. --Haeferl 03:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Old Fair Cathedral --A.Savin 02:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Kremlin, former Governor's residence --A.Savin 02:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: building of NizhNovEnergo --A.Savin 02:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: UTM-7 tram --A.Savin 02:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southern view at the castle, Schloss #1, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Haeferl 03:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western view at the castle, Schloss #1, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Access balcony and southern wing of the castle, Schloss #1, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southern wing of the castle with access balcony, Schloss #1, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Haeferl 03:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southwestern view at the castle, Schloss #1, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 02:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rhododendron maximum in Rhode Island --Rhododendrites 01:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fort Wetherill, Jamestown, RI --Rhododendrites 01:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough for QI. --Haeferl 02:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The San Diego Natural History Museum as seen from the third floor --Rhododendrites 01:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Haeferl 02:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Diego Museum of Man - window detail --Rhododendrites 01:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tabatabaeis Historic House, Kashan, Iran --Poco a poco 00:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 01:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abyaneh, Iran --Poco a poco 00:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 02:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hanjan Castle, Hanjan, Iran --Poco a poco 00:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citadelle of Meybod, Iran --Poco a poco 00:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fortress of Bam, Iran --Poco a poco 00:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oaks (Quercus robur) in Drottningholm palace garden. --ArildV 21:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Råcksta chapell and crematory, Stockholm. --ArildV 21:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 21:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Duins at Ouddorp --Tuxyso 20:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 21:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sign Santiago 2500 km in Renesse, a sign pointing to the Way of Saint James --Tuxyso 20:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion GC Ezarate 22:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oagåssn" Located in the municipality Falkenstein, District Mistelbach,Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 20:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars Neuer Weg. Located in the municipality Falkenstein, District Mistelbach,Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 20:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion This one doesn`t exhibit any "pollution" in the sky. Therefore good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars Schloßberg near the ruin Falkenstein. Located in the municipality Falkenstein, District Mistelbach,Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 20:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion That`s a good one. But tell us how the wine tastes over there. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Floating bridge of Garaio over the Ullíbarri-Gamboa reservoir. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 19:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 20:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Ullíbarri-Gamboa reservoir, from the floating bridge of Garaio. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 19:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 02:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Floating bridge of Garaio over the Ullíbarri-Gamboa reservoir. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 19:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden wheelbarrow --DeFacto 19:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain Beriain, viewed from Etxarri-Aranatz. Navarra, Spain --Basotxerri 19:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain Beriain, viewed from Etxarri-Aranatz. Garden of the restaurant "Borda" Navarra, Spain --Basotxerri 19:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition with object in foreground. --Michielverbeek 22:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bara Ahnik Temple. By User:Nahid.rajbd --NahidSultan 17:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain walk from Pejo to Lago Covel (1,839 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). European larch (Larix decidua) on a rock wall.
    --Famberhorst 15:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --СССР 15:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antique cannon. Location: Church of San Rocco surrounded in the military cemetery in Peio Paese.
    --Famberhorst 15:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 16:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fly windswept pines (Pinus sylvestris). Location, Schaopedobbe (Schapenpoel) in the Netherlands.
    --Famberhorst 15:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks OK. --Peulle 17:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Milk Snail, Otala lactea --Llez 15:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --СССР 15:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spain, Cordoba, Plaza de la Agrupación de Cofradías --Berthold Werner 14:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Roof could have been a little sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Composition with buildings in Chicago. -- Alvesgaspar 13:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Our Lady Before Tyn, Prague. -- Alvesgaspar 13:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern tower of Charles Bridge (detail), Prague. -- Alvesgaspar 13:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The sky near the end of the day. Porto Covo, Portugal. ---- Alvesgaspar 13:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks very nice. Slight noise but pretty good considering the resolution. --Peulle 14:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malay bride. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. --Halavar 11:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dutch Square. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. --Halavar 11:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Information board. Stadthuys. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. --Halavar 11:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Famosa - Porta de Santiago. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. --Halavar 11:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buildings on the Malacca River. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. --Halavar 11:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: building at 49, Rozhdestvenskaya Street --A.Savin 10:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Severnaya Tower of the Kremlin --A.Savin 10:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 14:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Riverside Terminal at the Volga --A.Savin 10:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Nativity (Stroganov) Church --A.Savin 10:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion A tick dark, but anyhow QI --Poco a poco 11:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Kirovskaya metro station --A.Savin 10:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volbeat; Citadel Music Festival 2016. By User:MarkusFelix --Achim Raschka 10:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 14:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volbeat; Citadel Music Festival 2016. By User:MarkusFelix --Achim Raschka 10:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice, it has FP potential to me but the right crop should be improved (those 2 guys) --Poco a poco 11:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volbeat; Citadel Music Festival 2016. By User:MarkusFelix --Achim Raschka 10:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volbeat; Citadel Music Festival 2016. By User:MarkusFelix --Achim Raschka 10:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good quality. --Peulle 14:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volbeat; Citadel Music Festival 2016. By User:MarkusFelix --Achim Raschka 10:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 14:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief above the entrance to one of the houses in downtown Yangon --Jakubhal 09:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Half-timbered house in Serrfeld in the Rhön-Grabfeldkreis --Ermell 09:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Half-timbered house in Serrfeld in the Rhön-Grabfeldkreis --Ermell 09:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. Nice details on the left. ;-) --XRay 10:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Half-timbered house in Serrfeld in the Rhön-Grabfeldkreis --Ermell 09:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish Church of St. Bartholomew in Kirchehrenbach --Ermell 09:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Catholic Marienkapelle (Gönninger Chapel) in the cemetery in Bamberg as a replica of the Gnadenkapelle von Einsiedeln 1761-1768 --Ermell 09:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone house, Bolshoi Zayatsky Island, Solovetsky Islands, White Sea, Russia. --Godot13 09:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 10:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the Vasilyevskaya Curtain, Peter and Paul Fortress, and the Military Archive, on Zayachy Island, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Godot13 09:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 10:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Islamic Museum on the Temple Mount, Old City of Jerusalem. --Godot13 09:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 11:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity statue in Nowa Ruda 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity statue in Nowa Ruda 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity statue in Nowa Ruda 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity statue in Nowa Ruda 4 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity statue in Nowa Ruda 5 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of St. Petri church in Altona. --Ajepbah 08:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 10:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bodelschwingh Church in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 08:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sule Pagoda in Yangon --Jakubhal 07:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Geocode would have been nice. --Peulle 14:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windecken-Hessen, townhall --Michielverbeek 07:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windecken-Hessen, street (die Pestalozzistrasse) view --Michielverbeek 07:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sultan Amir Ahmad Bathhouse, Kashan, Iran --Poco a poco 06:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition, focus to the front, quality high enough for Q1--Michielverbeek 06:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old Bazaar of Kashan, Kashan, Iran --Poco a poco 06:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bazaar of Kerman, Iran --Poco a poco 06:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citadelle of Meybod, Iran --Poco a poco 06:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vank Cathedral, Isfahan, Iran --Poco a poco 06:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Akan Gold Weight, Circular weight with patterns --Ercé 05:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overgrown habitat in mild evening light. Location, nature Delleboersterheide - Cats Poele, in the Netherlands.
    --Famberhorst 05:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. A lonely sheep. :-) --XRay 05:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain walk from Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi (2015 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). Detail of a house along the mountain path.
    --Famberhorst 05:26, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Weak  Support Good quality. Shadow top left a little bit disturbing. --XRay 05:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
    Note. I tried to reduce the shade, but that did not happen.--Famberhorst 06:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walking through flowering heaths and shifting sands of Schaopedobbe (Schapenpoel) in the Netherlands.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View over the Rhine near Bonn-Beuel, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Westdeutsche Lotterie at Schauraum 2016, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manufacturer logo “Opel” at a Opel Rekord (at a classic car meeting at the marketplace), Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama of Boston at dusk. --King of Hearts 04:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 05:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Karel Gott, Czech vocalist. By User:David Sedlecký --Ralf Roletschek 04:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness should be better. --XRay 05:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Škoda 24Tr Irisbus in Riga, Latvia --Ralf Roletschek 04:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 06:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flugplatz Tegel --Ralf Roletschek 04:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flugplatz Stuttgart --Ralf Roletschek 04:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 03:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 03:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 03:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 03:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 03:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Repalle passenger being hauled by a WDP engine.--Nikhilb239 01:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline The background is sharp, but there is some motion blur in the train, it isn't really sharp. Not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 06:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Khammam Town as seen from Narasimha Swamy hill in Khammam --Nikhilb239 01:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --A.Savin 10:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Automatic machine for drinking water sale --AlixSaz 14:21, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Lacking sharpness: blurred on the inscriptions, also sharpening artefacts are there --A.Savin 10:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave at the outer wall of St.Martin in Tiefenpölz near Bamberg --Ermell 12:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 10:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Akan Gold Weight, Cubic weight. --Ercé 07:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but there seems to be a very small dust spot just to the left of the near left corner of the weight. You might want to remove that. I'd second Poco a poco's request for you to review some of the other nominations here. I rarely nominate anything here, but I review, anyway. You nominate a lot of photos. -- Ikan Kekek 09:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
     Done --Ercé 06:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 02:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Too much of suppressed noise on the sky --A.Savin 10:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dorfkirche Alt Lönnewitz --Ralf Roletschek 08:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline Unsharp, especially on the right side; camera motion blur? --Peulle 10:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New York Police Department (NYPD) metal crowd control barriers (for use during Pride 2016) --Rhododendrites 05:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion I'm sorry to say it, but there is some residual CA and purple fringing in many places. However this is in gray-scale so you can get rid of it simply by running the desaturation sponge/brush over them at 100%. W.carter 19:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
    @W.carter:  Done I think perhaps I will start taking more pictures of single-color solid blocks in the future. :) Rhododendrites 15:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
    Yeah, that would definetely be easier. ;) Good quality. --W.carter 08:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walls and the tower of Castelvecchio. Verona, Italy --Ввласенко 16:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Looks pretty good, perspective seems OK, though there are a couple of dust spots that could do with removing.--Peulle 17:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC) Done Sorry and thank you --Ввласенко 10:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC) Support Seems OK. It's a go for QI. :)--Peulle 17:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exterior of the San Diego Natural History Museum. --Rhododendrites 19:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please remove CA.--Godot13 06:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
    @Godot13: Done. Thanks. Rhododendrites 13:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
    Mild  Support- lighting/exposure could be better, but detail is sharp. OK for QI.-Godot13 20:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arco Chato --Rogelio Moreno Gill 15:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Needs a bit of perspective correction and if you could pull back a bit on the saturation that would be good. It also needs a description and better categories. W.carter 08:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
    @W.carter: Done. Vazquitopty 23:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
    Very well done! Good quality. --W.carter 08:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sant'Antonio con il Bambino by Biagio Bellotti --Yiyi 12:59, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Background removal process looks OK at 100%. --Peulle 10:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the city from the Bebris-Tsikhe Fortress. Mtskheta, Georgia. --Halavar 10:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Please improve sharpness and contrast. Very soft and dusty. --XRay 06:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
     Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
    Very weak  Support IMO better and good enough. Minor perspective problems. --XRay 05:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Djem Amphitheatre, Tunisia. By User:Ihebezziaer --Мирослав Видрак 11:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Please check your image. CAs, perspective correction necessary, lights overexposed. --XRay 15:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
     Not done within a week. --XRay 05:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Будинок житловий, Київ, Банкова вул., 10. By User:Max harrer --Мирослав Видрак 11:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Please check your image. CAs at the windows, overexposed lights. --XRay 15:24, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
     Not done within a week. --XRay 05:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:16-09-29-Bahnhof_Calau-RR2_6548.jpg

• Nomination Bahnhof Calau --Ralf Roletschek 11:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose May I suggest some perspective correction, gentlemen? --A.Savin 14:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Building on the left, you mean? I see that too. I also noted a dust spot on the right - could easily be fixed.--Peulle 07:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

there is nothing to distort. --Ralf Roletschek 11:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I see no lack. -- Spurzem 11:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment No real need for perspective correction, because it would be barely visible. But slight CCW rotation would be helpful. --Smial 15:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:16-09-16-Flugplatz_Tegel-RR2_5853.jpg

• Nomination Flugplatz Tegel, Airbus A320 der Airberlin --Ralf Roletschek 11:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose And here we go again, Groundhog's Day... Inappropriate categories... And also dust spots... --A.Savin 14:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose What are the letters in mirror writing in the sky to the left of the plane? Also, A.Savin is right: You need to have the model of plane among your categories. And if your response to this is to withdraw because you don't feel like adding the category, I will consider that very disappointing. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others; image title and categories don't seem to indicate that this is a plane, not an airport. Seriously, Ralf Roletschek, you should know better by now. You're doing such fine work with the images you take, why not make the same level of effort with the Commons indexing? What use is adding a good image in to encyclopedia if people can't find it afterwards? --Peulle 07:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition, good sharpness and colors. The type of plane should be added in the description of the image. -- Spurzem 11:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Adiantum peruvianum 8891.jpg

• Nomination Adiantum peruvianum --Vengolis 00:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sorry, the flower pot is tilted and disturbing IMO", but I'm not sure, let discuss--Lmbuga 00:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I do only see the beauty of the plant. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Ok Johann, I'm not sure, but to me a QI must be more than..., but... Thanks in any case for your opinion--Lmbuga 02:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment It`s just my personal point of view, nothing else. I can also retrace your "but". --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not a good framing. Also, the foreground leaf is out of focus. Alvesgaspar 13:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

==

• Nomination Пам'ятник Богдану Хмельницькому на честь того, що у визвольній війні 1648- 1654 рр. під керівництвом гетьмана України Б.Хмельницького м. Біла Церква була опорним пунктом боротьби українського народу проти польсько-шляхетського поневолення, Біла Церква, Вул. 50-річчя Перемоги- напроти дитячої муз.школи № 1 (колишнього «Замкового палацу» граф. Браницької). By User:R naumov --Мирослав Видрак 17:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Sorry, proposal is ininteligible--Lmbuga 20:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

• Ininteligible data of the picture. Strong contrast IMO--Lmbuga 20:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)  Support Well categorized now Good picture!!!!--Lmbuga 20:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

• lets discuss. --Ralf Roletschek 12:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm agree with "discuss", Ralf, but the picture only has description in one language, and only is categorized in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Ukraine--Lmbuga 19:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support this description is for me easier to understand than english. In my eyes no reason for oppose. --Ralf Roletschek 19:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

• Sorry, I'm not agree: The picture is not well categorized and I don't know which this language (or this statue) is. In short, can anyone tell me information about this sculpture? I will write it on the image data. Although maybe I should not do it--Lmbuga 21:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment First of all, this photo is no doubt a quality image, to my mind. I think we should add the category for the name of the statue and then declare this a QI by acclamation. -- Ikan Kekek 05:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Please check the file page now. W.carter 07:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks to the quick work of W.carter, the image now has a suitable category. @Lmbuga: The description doesn't need to be in English, although it's very helpful to the community if it is. The image itself is of good enough quality to reach QI status, albeit a slightly tight crop at the bottom right.--Peulle 09:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - OK. Is it legitimate to vote against a photo on the basis of an objectionable description? Here's the description that I would take issue with: "Under direction of B. Khmelnitsky Hetman of Ukraine. Bila Tserkva (White Church) was the stronghold of the struggle of the Ukrainian people against Polish gentry oppression". Unfortunately, Khmelnitsky is a hero to many Ukrainians. But major targets of the uprising he led were ordinary Jewish people, thousands and thousands of whom were massacred (there is some coverage at w:Khmelnytsky Uprising, particularly the section on Jews), and for Ashkenazic Jews of Eastern European origin, he is often considered to be second only to Hitler among the enemies of the Jewish people in relatively recent history. I would be totally fine with an objective description like this: "Bila Tserkva (White Church) was the stronghold of the Ukrainian forces he led against the Polish gentry", or something similar, and I don't insist that his mass murders of Jews be mentioned, but I'm afraid that I have a problem with the current wording. -- Ikan Kekek 09:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

• I should add that I would ask for the description to be changed in Ukrainian, too, and any other language it is translated into; otherwise, what's the point? -- Ikan Kekek 09:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

• I see your point and I empathize, but we should keep in mind that Commons is not a political arena. While a person may be described as a hero in one country, another country might not see him that way. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. I think the closest we can come to a compromise is shortening down the description so that it is less specific, perhaps something along the lines of: "a prominent figure in the Khmelnytsky Uprising". See what I mean? As for judging according to the QI guidelines, they don't go into detail about this, just that there must be "an accurate description". One thing you could do, is open a discussion about this on the file's discussion page.--Peulle 14:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

• Shortening is basically what I'm asking for, as you can see. I wasn't sure whether part of judging for QI and other types of judged statuses might have to do with some kind of standard of a neutral point of view or, as on Wikivoyage, a "fair" description. I guess in this case, "accurate" would be the issue. I seriously doubt anyone will read anything on the file's discussion page, though. Does anyone ever read those? -- Ikan Kekek 16:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
• The photographer should certainly read it. I'm note sure if there is a way you can call attention to it from others as well, but it can't hurt to try. Another possibility is to suggest an edit yourself. This is Commons, so you are free to edit the work if you believe it is an improvement. Having a look at the descriptions of other images of the same statue can help.--Peulle (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Question Is there any way to link to this thread for reference on the file's talk page? -- Ikan Kekek 09:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment It should all end up on the photo owner's talk page, under the image comments.--Peulle 19:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Good enough. Alvesgaspar 13:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Delete} this file. Sorry, but there is no FOP for Ukraine. --Brateevsky 19:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 13:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Church_of_the_Christ_of_the_Savior,_Храм_Христа_Спасителя,_Вид_со_стороны_Волхонки.jpg

• Nomination Church of the Christ of the Savior --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 13:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment Sky covered with dust spots and noise artefacts. Categories should be fixed as well.--Ermell 17:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient quality --A.Savin 17:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
• @Ermell, whats wrong with category? --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think the dead link is fixed now.--Ermell 20:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others, as Savin--Lmbuga 01:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Heavily overprocessed, artefacts and oversharpening. Redlink in categories too.--Peulle 09:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Гроза_і_замок.jpg

• Nomination Pidhirtsi Castle. By User:Robert-Erik --Ahonc 20:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Some CAs to be fixed, needs slight perspective correction and, IMHO, the lightning is fake and added with postprocessing. --C messier 07:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp areas, weird blue halo around the roof - this is not a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversharpened, noisy, green CA.--Peulle 09:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Photoshop desaster, sorry. --Smial 13:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Hubertl 15:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 13:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Inner_Place_of_Church_of_the_Christ_of_the_Savior.jpg

• Nomination Church of the Christ of the Savior --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 13:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. Nothing is sharp, poor lighting --A.Savin 17:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Support sharp enough for QI at 24 MP and light ok. --Ralf Roletschek 20:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose - I agree with A.Savin. -- Ikan Kekek 23:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment @Savin: If you think nothing is sharp than a fixed ww lens with 1/800 f14 FX is not good enough. You are well knwon for strange comments (poor lighting)...What I found out and this is really poor minimum 3 dust spots on chip --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  

Please try to avoid ad hominem arguments. I usually work with high standards of quality, although I use a camera cheaper than yours. So you surely could apply at least same standards if you wanted to, otherwise you have to live with the fact that many of your photos being declined here (or to leave QIC completely). --A.Savin 10:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Something seems to have gone wrong with the processing here - it just doesn't look natural. Possibly oversharpened with attempt at compensation afterwards?--Peulle 09:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Храм_Христа_Спасителя._Вид_со_стороны_Волхонки._—_Cathedral_of_Christ_the_Saviour.jpg

• Nomination Church of the Christ of the Savior --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 13:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Inufficient quality --A.Savin 17:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose per A.Savin. The domes and upper parts of the sky are not QI quality, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 05:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just to say some more words than "crap" or "marvellous": Blurred, probably by noise reduction. Perspective improvable. Why ISO800 in bright sunshine when taking a shot of a static object? You lose at least two f-stops of the sensor's capability to manage high contrast. so here we see also lost detail in bright areas. --Smial 00:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Smial.--Peulle 09:25, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Zodiac crew in thick fog over Hinlopen strait reaches mothership.jpg

• Nomination Thick fog on Hinlopen strait, Svalbard --AWeith 12:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Even if this is a good artistic example of fog, a QI has to have something that contrasts a bit more than this IMO. File should also be renamed since that name has to reflect what an observer actually sees in the pic. Sorry. --W.carter 08:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Dear W.carter, I agree to your comment regarding the title. However, with all due respect, I can't accept the argument regarding the contrast in a foggy situation. You may agree that there is hardly any substantial contrast, especially not in an extreme fog as displayed here. None of the QI's at commons reflects such a situation yet and those displaying fog do not present substantial contrast either. It would be non-natural anyway. Nevermind; I'd accept your vote though in case you do not accept my arguments. -- AWeith 16:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
    
    •  Comment No problem, this is what 'Consensual Review' is for. :) I don't believe you've had one of those before. Let's hear what the rest of the community thinks about this very hard decision. The additional contrast I was speaking of could have been another (more visible) object between the Zodiac and the camera. Thanks for the rename though! --W.carter 18:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
      
•  Support It looks as described, and I definitely have experienced thick fog like this (walked through it many times, in fact, in the morning in Long Island). -- Ikan Kekek 05:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  
  •  Comment Hold it. I've temporarily struck through my support vote. There's a dust spot in the fog in front of the ship that needs to be removed. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
    •  Done Ikan Kekek, thanks for spotting it (them!); hope I caught them all. W.carter, this was not your major complaint; I wanted to let you know anyway. --AWeith 08:16, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
      • @AWeith: True, I simply missed that one, Ikan is a better dust spotter than I am. :) More eyes makes for better pics. It will be interesting to see how the consensus will be on this pic since it will set a precedent for other pics in the future. You challenge us with photos that are not common here and that's great! :) W.carter 09:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
      •  Support I had seen only one before. I reinstate my support. -- Ikan Kekek 09:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. The image shows the typical technical limitations auf digital cameras and 8-bit-jpg: slight remains of low frequency chroma noise and slight posterization when depicting very soft colour gradients. But composition is good and the topic is very well illustrated. --Smial 09:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good shot for its subject; there should be fog images on Commons and considering the conditions, this is OK.--Peulle 20:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Quite nice. Almost a good FP candidate... Alvesgaspar 13:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you so much for your positive judgements; you light up my memories of one of the most adventurous incidents of my life. We were really threatened whether we would make our way back. And this - for my personal sentiment - has been one of the most moving images I ever took. In this context, Alvesgaspar and all of you here, thank you that you consider this image a felicitous one!. --AWeith 21:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

• AWeith Glad you made it back despite the fog. For safety reasons, I trust you had radio equipment on the zodiacs and with an adequate naval radar system on board the ship, the ship's crew ought to be able to clearly detect the zodiacs on the radar and guide you towards the ship. -- Slaunger 20:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)