Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 12 2017

Consensual review

edit

File:Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 10.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 00:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Very nice and probably already a QI, but what is that thing in the upper right corner, and might you consider decreasing the light just a little, and possibly upping the sharpness? -- Ikan Kekek 02:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overexposed, very blurry and all the details got lost during processing the image either in-camera or later in post. --Granada 07:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Just curious: Why did you take this to CR before seeing what Tournasol did in reaction to my remarks? I hadn't promoted the file. You could have waited to see what he did, or you could have declined and waited to see whether I'd contest the decline. -- Ikan Kekek 09:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   New version, Tournasol7 15:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. - I want to see this image in CR to get other opinions on that. --Granada 21:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Why images should not be downsampled? And sorry, but I don't know what is "CR". Tournasol7 13:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
"CR" is short for "Consensual Review", the section of QIC where the nomination and this discussion is now done. --W.carter 13:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment IMHO, it leans clockwise (see the bridges). --C messier 20:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment - The image is per se fine to me, but when I increase the size to the original size, it looks only marginally sharper. So I'm not sure whether to oppose, support, or be neutral. -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me, perhaps not FP -- Spurzem 12:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --PumpkinSky 12:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Grave Michael Lunn (1820-1895) MG 4319.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The grave of Michael Lunn (1820-1895) Managing Balashikha cotton-spinning factory, Balashikha, Moscow region--AlixSaz 14:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality, i think. --GT1976 15:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

*  Oppose Needs perspective correction, please fix. @GT1976: In this kind of images, the verticals should be verticals. This is most visible on the fence: both sides are leaning out (but it's visible on the base of the gravestone, too). If it's not clear, please contact me. --Basotxerri 18:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

  • Thanks and perspective correction   Fixed--AlixSaz 05:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
  • @GT1976: Can you see the difference? --Basotxerri 18:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 12:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --PumpkinSky 12:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

File:The tomb of Archimandrite Silouan, Abbot of the Dormition in the Second Athos monastery on mount Beshtau.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The tomb of Archimandrite Silouan, Abbot of the Dormition in the Second Athos monastery on mount Beshtau--AlixSaz 14:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality, i think. --GT1976 15:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

*  Oppose Tilted and maybe needs a perspective correction too, please fix. @GT1976: Check always for verticals, they have to be straight (in your images too ;-) ). --Basotxerri 19:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

  • Thanks and perspective correction  Fixed--AlixSaz 05:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me now. --Basotxerri 18:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --PumpkinSky 12:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)