Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 16 2019

• 
  • Nomination Sculpture in the Dallas Museum of Art, Texas, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 04:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.
• 
  • Nomination 1 Konopnickiej Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 Świętego Wojciecha Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 Świętego Wojciecha Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Polish Tower of Pisa in the background? :) --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Świętego Wojciecha Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Świętego Wojciecha Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tübingen, Germany: Probably the best known ensemble of historic buildings in Tübingen is the so-called Neckarfront, which consists almost entirely of listed buildings. It is mostly photographed from the Neckar bridge, therefore with this photo I have tried to show a less known view from the Plataneninsel (plane tree island). In the middle on the river Neckar there is a Stocherkahn (punt) passing, very typical for Tübingen. On the left you see the Hölderlinturm behind its magnificent weeping willow, on the right the row of historic town houses. By User:Aristeas --Dktue 22:04, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose already nominated and promoted below --Carschten 22:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint John Evangelist in the Chiesa di Sant'Afra church in Brescia. --Moroder 21:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skating Hall, Budapest --Jakubhal 21:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion ~Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vajdahunyad Castle in Budapest --Jakubhal 21:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2019 Renault Megane R.S. 300 Trophy 1.8 Front Taken in Leamington Spa --Vauxford 20:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sharp photo, good light, no disturbing elemnents, good quality --Michielverbeek 20:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination pipe organ in the Santi Nazaro e Celso church in Brescia. --Moroder 19:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the High Tatras from Minčol (Renomination) --Milan Bališin 18:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Your pictures make me miss Slovakia --Podzemnik 22:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Perceuse multibroches dans un atelier de menuiserie --Adoscam 17:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality, sorry --Podzemnik 22:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Hoenderloo and Hoog Buurlo-NL, cycle track het Dabbelosepad --Michielverbeek 16:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination near Hoog Buurlo-NL, heath at the Turfbergweg --Michielverbeek 16:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Assel and Hoog Soeren-NL heath area: the Asselse Heide --Michielverbeek 16:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schwäbisch Hall, Germany: View of the Comburg abbey. --Aristeas 14:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speyer, Germany: View from the Altpörtel tower over the old town to Speyer Cathedral and other churches, with colourful evening light. --Aristeas 14:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pontiac Bonneville --Berthold Werner 14:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Antonino and San Cristoforo Mompiano churches in Brescia. --Moroder 14:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Isiwal 14:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Cristoforo Mompiano church in Brescia. --Moroder 12:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 13:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination maize paw made the day before with vegetables (Wokoli in fon language in Benin) --Adoscam 12:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unsharp, noisy and strange anle of view --George Chernilevsky 15:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Computer maintenance toolbox --Adoscam 12:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Unsharp and noisy --George Chernilevsky 15:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination carpentry workshop in Cotonou, Benin --Adoscam 12:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Shadows too dark, highlights blown out --Berthold Werner 14:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nir Biton. By User:Ailura --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Isiwal 14:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moanes Dabour. By User:Steindy --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Isiwal 14:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulpit in the Protestant church of Watzendorf in the district of Coburg --Ermell 07:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior with organ gallery in the Protestant church of Watzendorf in the district of Coburg --Ermell 07:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior in the Protestant church of Watzendorf in the district of Coburg --Ermell 07:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling in the Protestant church of Watzendorf in the district of Coburg --Ermell 07:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe organ in the Protestant church of Watzendorf in the district of Coburg --Ermell 07:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dianthus hyssopifolius in PNR Pyrénées ariégeoises, commune of Auzat, Ariege, France. --Tournasol7 07:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woodpecker Bay in West Coast Region, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 07:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue Saint-Fleuret in Estaing, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain at Place des Toiles in Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Étang d'Escales in PNR Pyrénées ariégeoises, commune of Auzat, Ariege, France. --Tournasol7 07:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Antonino Mompiano church in Brescia. --Moroder 06:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Henry church, Kiel, Germany --Poco a poco 06:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nicholas church, Kiel, Germany --Poco a poco 06:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petrus church, Kiel, Germany --Poco a poco 06:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Nicholas Church, Rosenheim, Germany --Poco a poco 06:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nicholas church, Kiel, Germany --Poco a poco 06:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Water element in Plaz in Vnà.
    --Famberhorst 06:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drenched (Clitocybe nebularis) in decay.
    --Famberhorst 06:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra to Ramosch. Wooden staircase connects the mountain path.
    --Famberhorst 06:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Prümaran Prui via Alp Laret to Ftan. View of the surrounding mountains.
    --Famberhorst 06:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Höllgraben" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Höllgraben" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Höllgraben" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Höllgraben" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier View of the surrounding mountains.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier Bernina Granite boulder.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) Braiding stream on glacier bottom.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. View of the mountains from Alp Sesvenna.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jesus and the sleeping disciples on the Mount of Olives (15th century) in the main church of the Abbey of Saint-Michel-de-Cuxa, France --Llez 05:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the main church of the Abbey of Saint-Michel-de-Cuxa, France --Llez 05:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Part of the cloister, Abbey of Saint-Michel-de-Cuxa, France --Llez 05:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Part of the cloister, Abbey of Saint-Michel-de-Cuxa, France --Llez 05:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Optical mineralogy: Photomicrographs of thin section from Siilinjärvi apatite ore. --Kallerna 05:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Optical mineralogy: Photomicrographs of thin section from Siilinjärvi apatite ore. --Kallerna 05:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scanned image of thin section from Siilinjärvi apatite ore. Crossed polarizers. --Kallerna 05:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scanned image of thin section from Siilinjärvi apatite ore. Crossed polarizers. --Kallerna 05:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scanned image of thin section from Siilinjärvi apatite ore. Crossed polarizers. --Kallerna 05:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Kings Park to the city of Perth, Western Australia, Australia --XRay 05:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary's Cathedral, Perth, Western Australia, Australia --XRay 05:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture “Spanda” (Christian de Vietri, 2016) at Elizabeth Quay, Perth, Western Australia, Australia --XRay 05:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Elizabeth Quay, Perth, Western Australia, Australia --XRay 05:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Elizabeth Quay Bridge, Perth, Western Australia, Australia --XRay 05:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Villa Venezia Johannaweg #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Villa Wörth on Johannaweg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Kopper Bay from the park on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartments Werzer on Annastrasse #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Villa Almrausch on Hauptstrasse #110, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 Dolnośląska Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 02:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Grunwaldzka Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 02:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion There are some CAs in the upper right corner, easy to fix --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)@Llez:  Done--Jacek Halicki 08:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support OK now --Llez 15:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Grunwaldzka Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie 2 --Jacek Halicki 02:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Grunwaldzka Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie 3 --Jacek Halicki 02:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 Konopnickiej Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 02:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Witches' tower of the former Fulda city wall --Carschten 00:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opel 1,2 Liter from 1932 at Internationale ADAC Moselschiefer-Classic 2014 -- Spurzem 00:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kato Vrysi fountain in Anatoli, Crete. --C messier 19:34, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Isiwal 14:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salzburg Cathedral, Austria. --Poco a poco 17:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Isiwal 14:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garni Temple in Kotayk province, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 17:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woeste Hoeve-NL, war memorial the Woeste Hoeve --Michielverbeek 16:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown bear in Ähtäri Zoo. --Kallerna 12:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    looks overall too greenish to me, doesn't it? --Carschten 00:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
    White balance adjusted. --Kallerna 05:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Thanks, much better! The crop at the top could be better, but good enough for QI to me. --Carschten 22:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Khao Sok, primary tropical rainforest of southern Thailand. --Argenberg 11:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Noisy and lack of detail --Cvmontuy 00:40, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Antonino Mompiano church in Brescia. --Moroder 01:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Great sharpness, good composition. But IMHO a bit too bright/not enough contrast. Could you try to make the dark tones darker (again)? No offence, I just want to help. --Aristeas 10:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC) Comment On the contrary, I appreciate your comment and also thought by miself that the photo is bright but, looking at the spectrum, all grades are covered. On the other side, to tell you the truth I'd have to go back to the RAW file to enhance the shadows but I already spent a lot of time clonig out street signs etc on the JPG file therefore I think I could dedicate my time to other photos I still have to upload. Cheers --Moroder 16:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support I understand your point very well ;–). OK, I still think that the image could be even better with more contrast, but compared to other recently promoted QI images, it is definitely a QI for me as it is. --Aristeas 08:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Epidendrum orchids in Tepoztlan Morelos --Cvmontuy 00:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not well focused --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hogevank Monastery in Shirak province, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 20:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marmashen monastery in Shirak province, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 20:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Texas State Capitol - Austin, Texas, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 22:31, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Geometric distortion, perspective correction is required for this kind of architectural image. Distortion is OK for a "worm eye" style pictures (from down point to up). --George Chernilevsky 12:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Korean Presbyterian Church, Christchurch --Podzemnik 04:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    Especially without the dust spot. --Steindy 21:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    Removed --Podzemnik 02:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now --George Chernilevsky 12:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Mt Fyffe, Kaikoura Ranges --Podzemnik 04:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    Especially without the dust spot. --Steindy 21:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    Again, I don't see any --Podzemnik 02:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality and even awarded as FP. Many reviewers viewed this image. I do not see the indicated problem --George Chernilevsky 12:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
    Nice if it was awarded by many users as FP. That you only see defects with me is already clear to me. You have to take a closer look at the photos and do not judge by the name. --Steindy 16:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC) It was hard to spot, removed. --Podzemnik 04:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential Red Zone in New Brighton, Christchurch --Podzemnik 04:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    And what will we do with the CAs? --Steindy 21:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    СА on pillars against the sky on the left and right --George Chernilevsky 12:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC) I'm gonna withdraw this one, thanks for the reviews, all good. --Podzemnik 04:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Maiernigg and Sekim in Carinthia the Wörthersee --Michielverbeek 07:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 14:04, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Artificial palm tree in Warsaw. By User:Boston9 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Good but there is a bunch of dust spots in the sky --Poco a poco 07:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination--Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mat amaranth (Amaranthus blitoides) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 15:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Stanisław Wyspiański in Łazienki Park. By User:Ethan Doyle White --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 21:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Waasen" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 13:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shand's Emporium, Christchurch --Podzemnik 00:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
    And who will remove the dust spot? --Steindy 21:57, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    Removed --Podzemnik 02:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now --George Chernilevsky 15:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lorinser customed Smart EQ Fortwo at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 12:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Review Die Reflexe machen das Bild sehr "unruhig", sodass das Auto nur schwer zu erkennen ist. -- Spurzem 16:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chiesa di San Rocco church in Brescia. --Moroder 11:45, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support I have the feeling this image is too big for its motive... there are some CA, but otherwise the quality is good. QI. --Carschten 01:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review. The point is that the image is made out of four single shots each of 50 Mpx because the street is very narrow so I had to take oblique shots and stitch them resulting in a big image which I could reduce in size but that is an other issue. Cheers --Moroder 06:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Jerusalem–Yitzhak Navon railway station. By User:Ilya Varlamov --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination High Court of Telangana in Hyderabad -- IM3847 12:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Tilted --ArildV 10:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose CW tilted --George Chernilevsky 12:39, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern Funafuti. By User:Davidarfonjones~commonswiki --Andrew J.Kurbiko 22:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    
     I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 17:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC))
    It's tilted --Podzemnik 00:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination--Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Godley_Statue,_Christchurch,_New_Zealand_02.jpg

• Nomination Godley Statue, Christchurch --Podzemnik 03:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Nice and good quality. --Aristeas 10:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Dust spot on left foot. --Steindy 12:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. I do not see the indicated problem --George Chernilevsky 12:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Maybe you should take a closer look at the photo and do not judge by the name. The dust spot is also easy to find, as it usually finds itself in the same area. But of course, you can only find the mistakes with me. --Steindy 16:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Steindy Again, I'm kindly asking you to take a break from the project or someone will soon or later force you to take it. You keep looking for dust spots everywhere and this is the third time that you're claiming a piece of shadow on my picture to be a dust spot. Perhaps taking a break would allow you to gain the perspective again and realize why we all here. All the best, --Podzemnik 21:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Funny photo, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:43, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I agree, good shot --PantheraLeo1359531 10:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Cannot find the spot. --Smial 10:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good framing, good lighting and exposure, suitably sharp. (I've spent 120 seconds hunting for a dust spot around the statue feet and cannot see anything even in pixel-for-pixel view.)--Bobulous 19:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Did not find dust spot. --Axel 13:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Avon_River_along_New_Brighton_Road,_Christchurch,_New_Zealand.jpg

• Nomination Avon River along New Brighton Road, Christchurch --Podzemnik 03:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. Clear streak formation in the water and the usual dust spot. --Steindy 10:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - I don't understand. The water looks normal to me, and if there is indeed a dust spot, I can't see it, though I do see a bird in the distance. To me, this photo looks very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I see no lack. -- Spurzem 10:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment @Steindy: Could you please add image notes for the dust spot and the streak formation? We can’t spot them ;-). --Aristeas 14:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• Done. Whereby you can see the streak formation already in the reduced view. --Steindy (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you very much! Well, I agree that there is a dust spot (or something similar). But the streak formation I would have regarded just as some reflection of the two trees. What do other people think? --Aristeas 18:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Then it must be a very, very long reflection over the middle of the picture. This again does not match the state of the sun. --Steindy 19:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I've removed what was claimed to be a dust spot. I don't know about the streak formation, to me it's OK. Please note that Steindy has been blocked for a week for disruptive behaviour. --Podzemnik 04:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for removing the potential dust spot ;–). IMHO very good. --Aristeas 09:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support after rework. The dust spot was a dustspot, but the "streaks" are reflections. It does not need the sun to have reflections on water surface. --Smial (talk) 10:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ford_Thunderbird_1959_Ebern_2019_6200537.jpg

• Nomination Radiator of a Ford Thunderbird built in 1959 at the vintage car meeting 2019 in Ebern, Germany --Ermell 10:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Composition: The bottom crop I find too tight, and overall the image doesn't seem to have a very clear subject. --Peulle 11:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  

• I disagree. --Ermell 22:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, but i agree in this case --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Indeed a very special composition, but good technical quality. --Smial 15:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support good composition. --Ralf Roletschek 01:04, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Smial. --Aristeas 14:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:02, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

File:River_Avon_in_New_Brighton_during_sunset,_New_Zealand.jpg

• Nomination River Avon in New Brighton during sunset --Podzemnik 01:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Heavy chromatic noise and (the almost usual) dust spot. --Steindy 19:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Yes, a dust spot to the left of a lamppost should be fixed, but then it will be a QI. I don't see any heavy noise at all. -- Ikan Kekek 05:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Steindy. --Carschten 15:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I've removed the dustspot and denoised a bit. --Podzemnik 04:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell 07:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas 09:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Podzemnik, there's a strange ring right next to the lamppost that's 2nd from the bottom of the picture frame, where the dust spot used to be. -- Ikan Kekek 09:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Sunset_on_The_Shard_&_City_Hall_across_Thames_river_in_London.jpg

• Nomination Sunset on The Shard & City Hall across Thames river in London --IM3847 04:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Vengolis 06:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Not made by a Commoner, so not eligible. --Tsungam 11:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Yes, per se ineligible. Can this be speedily declined? -- Ikan Kekek 05:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   George Chernilevsky 16:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Rheden,_dode_boom_op_de_Posbank_IMG_2285_2019-08-25_07.50.jpg

• Nomination Rheden-NL, dead tree at the Posbank --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The shadow blights too much of the central object, cutting the tree in half. --Bobulous 18:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - There are also diagonals in the sky. I find these things interesting, not a blight. Good quality to me. - Ikan Kekek 09:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp, natural colours, good composition. --Smial 09:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support well done for the difficult light conditions; QI to me. --Carschten 15:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Sea_Star_560,_Nacka_(_1090791).jpg

• Nomination Sea Star 560 on Saltsjön, Nacka --MB-one 04:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Schönes Bild mit dem Hund im Fahrtwind, aber das Boot sollte bisschen dunkler sein. -- Spurzem 09:45, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  
• Frage: Warum sollte denn ein schneeweißes Boot dunkler sein? Mit gefällt es so wie es ist. --Manfred Kuzel 11:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  

@Manfred Kuzel: Ganz einfache Antwort: …, weil man auch an einem schneeweißen Boot Konturen deutlich erkennen soll. -- Spurzem 21:51, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Ich erkenne alle Korrekturen und daher  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Es its fein für mich. And don't expect any more German out of me. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 09:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg 19:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Jerusalem_-_20190205-DSC_0971.jpg

• Nomination Jerusalem–Yitzhak Navon railway station. By User:Ilya Varlamov --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 12:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Noise level to high IMHO --Poco a poco 20:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Poco. -- Ikan Kekek 05:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Poco.
•  Oppose per Poco. Struck unsigned vote above. --Peulle 08:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support Just ok for me --A.Savin 11:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. The high ISO setting was obviously necessary, and for ISO3200 it still looks pretty good. --Smial 01:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seven Pandas 01:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose unnötig hohe ISO und Rauschen. --Ralf Roletschek 01:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

File:March_of_Ukraine's_Defenders_on_Independence_Day_in_Kyiv,_2019_153.jpg

• Nomination March of Ukraine's Defenders on Independence Day in Kyiv, 2019 --Ввласенко 10:52, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Its a portrait of a guy, while more than 50% of space is occupied by someones back for no reason. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 21:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. I would suggest some cropping, but I think it's a good example of street photography and should not be judged according to criteria that apply to portrait photography in a photo studio. --Smial 09:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I consider criticism fair and therefore redid the picture. -- Ввласенко 13:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment Perfect, thx. --Smial 01:09, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support This one works. The guy with his back turned is not too disturbing since he is not cropped, and the man facing the camera is well framed.--Peulle 08:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

File:March_of_Ukraine's_Defenders_on_Independence_Day_in_Kyiv,_2019_345.jpg

• Nomination March of Ukraine's Defenders on Independence Day in Kyiv, 2019 345 --Ввласенко 08:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is a portrait but mostly shows someones back. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The guy on the left is too disturbing here imo.--Peulle 09:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I can live with distracting elements on portraits like this, but not with that unsharp guy in the foreground constitute 30% of the image. --Carschten 11:13, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - The opportunistic portrait of the man in the center and right is great, and I think that considering this was street photography, it's a good picture, regardless of the presence of the unsharp man facing away from the camera. -- Ikan Kekek 22:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Smial 23:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I understand that the traditions of the classic portrait are broken. But this was done on purpose, because the two figures complement each other as a two-sided portrait. The inscription on the shirt as the signature on the photo. -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think the inscription is cropped and not really readable --Andrew J.Kurbiko 21:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment Only the name of the battalion is cut off (from below), because, firstly, it is read on the chevron of the main object, and secondly, so that the format is not too stretched. The rest of the inscription fully retains its meaning. -- Ввласенко 13:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Aristeas 10:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Are there other voices? --Milseburg 14:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral The portrait is good, but the back of the other person is a little bit distracting --PantheraLeo1359531 16:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I find the back of the person disturbing.--Ermell 10:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)