Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 23 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Jan de Bray Washington October 2016-1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Jan de Bray, Portrait of the Artist's Parents: Salomon de Bray and Anna Westerbaen(1644). National Gallery of Art, Washington. -- Alvesgaspar 11:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 12:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Conditional   Oppose No promotion with me before categories sufficiently fixed --A.Savin 14:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support - Good quality. Added Category:Paintings in the National Gallery of Art. -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 08:04, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Ludolf Backhuysen Washington October 2016-1a.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ships in Distress off a Rocky Coast, by Ludolf Backhuysen (1667). National Gallery of Art, Washington. -- Alvesgaspar 11:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Conditional   Oppose No promotion with me before categories sufficiently fixed --A.Savin 14:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support - One category made more specific: Category: Marine paintings by Ludolf Bakhuizen. Added Category:Paintings in the National Gallery of Art. Next time, please do this investigative work yourself and add the best categories. -- Ikan Kekek 10:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 08:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Canon_EOS_7D_DSLR_body_front.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Canon EOS 7D DSLR --Lucasbosch 09:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Conditional   Oppose: no promotion with me before categories are fixed. Very poor categories at the moment. --A.Savin 14:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good Quality Image. --Ralf Roletschek 11:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with A.Savin, pic is fine but good categories must be for a QI. You just need to find the category for that exact camera, try entering the model in the searchbox up in the right corner and you will find it. W.carter 12:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Jebus... in some cases, looking for categories can be difficult and a lot of work, not to be expected from reviewers. In this case, though, it took me 30 seconds to fix the categories for all three images. Some times it's better to just fix the problem.--Peulle 12:19, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes, I also did that at first, but doing that will only encourage some uploaders to skip that part since someone-else-who-knows-how-to-do-that-better could just add the cats anyway so why should they bother with the boring stuff. Now they can rely on you to add the cats. Also changed my vote since cats are fixed.   Support W.carter 15:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, that's exactly the point. Many uploaders only care about their upload count and do not give a shit to correct categories. But a QI should just have all attributes of quality, including categories. It is not a job of the reviewer to fix categories, as well as it is not his job to fix dustspots etc.. Lucasbosch, are you reading this? --A.Savin 15:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Peulle for fixing the categories, I'll do it the right way from now on. Thanks A.Savin for the mention. --Lucasbosch 16:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   (acclamation, speedy resolution)--Peulle 12:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Canon_EOS_7D_DSLR_body_front_cap.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Canon EOS 7D DSLR --Lucasbosch 09:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Conditional   Oppose: no promotion with me before categories are fixed. Very poor categories at the moment. --A.Savin 14:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good Quality Image. --Ralf Roletschek 11:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with A.Savin, pic is fine but good categories must be for a QI. You just need to find the category for that exact camera, try entering the model in the searchbox up in the right corner and you will find it. W.carter 12:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Categories fixed, QI.--Peulle 12:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Cats fixed. W.carter 15:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   (acclamation, speedy resolution)--Peulle 12:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Canon_EOS_7D_DSLR_body_back.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Canon EOS 7D DSLR --Lucasbosch 09:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Conditional   Oppose: no promotion with me before categories are fixed. Very poor categories at the moment. --A.Savin 14:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good Quality Image. --Ralf Roletschek 11:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with A.Savin, pic is fine but good categories must be for a QI. You just need to find the category for that exact camera, try entering the model in the searchbox up in the right corner and you will find it. W.carter 12:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Categories fixed, QI.--Peulle 12:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Cats fixed. --W.carter 15:36, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   (acclamation, speedy resolution)--Peulle 12:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)