Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 25 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Jacobite_on_Glenfinnan_Viaduct_1_20211024.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination "The Jacobite" crossing Glenfinnan Viaduct, Scotland --Domob 16:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Beautiful composition, quality high enough for QI --Michielverbeek 18:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I disagree! The photo is totally out of focus. --Steindy 18:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. How is it "totally out of focus"? Seriously? --A.Savin 14:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support The photo is not over-sharpened and might therefore appear a little soft for some "more trendy" ways of viewing. --Smial 17:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Very good composition, small but enough resolution, too soft and to less detail. --Augustgeyler 10:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Commonists 20:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 23:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Bezděz_nádraží.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Bezděz train station, Czech Republic --Cmelak770 10:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 12:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but check the perspective please; right side i leaning in. --Tournasol7 05:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment The failure is very small and should be correctable very easily. --Augustgeyler (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I made a correction. --Cmelak770 11:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 12:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Piscinas_naturales,_Biscoitos,_isla_de_Terceira,_Azores,_Portugal,_2020-07-25,_DD_45.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Swimming pools, Biscoitos, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Oppose Image is overexposed and overall unsharp. -- Alvesgaspar 21:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment Should be ok now, I forgot somehow to apply any settings to the raw file --Poco a poco 18:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Seems okay now. Slight green CA on the ridge line on the right, but nothing major. Btw. given that we can see people's faces in the water because of the high resolution, I suggest a personality rights warning be applied.--Peulle 09:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)